|
APPLIES TO
All Employers with OR Employees
|
EFFECTIVE
As Indicated |
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
|
The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industry (BOLI) has released model notices for two laws whose notice requirements have very recently or will soon be going into effect. These are the Workplace Fairness Act, which covers anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies, and the Pregnancy Accommodation notice.
Workplace Fairness Act. Last year, the Oregon legislature passed the Workplace Fairness Act, which implemented various anti-discrimination and anti-harassment protections. Among these was the requirement for employers to adopt a written anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policy no later than October 1, 2020. The policy must contain specific information, including:
- Notification to employees that they have five years to pursue claims of prohibited conduct;
- Notification to employees that the employer cannot require workers to enter a non-disclosure or non-disparagement agreement;
- Explain that employees who are claiming to be victims of prohibited conduct may voluntarily request to enter an agreement including non-disclosure, non-disparagement, or no-rehire terms, and that employees have a seven-day revocation period to withdraw such agreement;
- Advise employees and employers to document any incidents of potentially prohibited conduct.
The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries has released a template policy that covers all topics required by the Act, available on the sexual harassment page of its website. Employers may utilize this template or create their own policy. The final policy must be distributed to all employees, provided to new employees at time of hire, and provided to an employee who reports information about alleged prohibited conduct.
Pregnancy Accommodation Notice. Effective January 1, 2020, Oregon employers of six or more employees must provide reasonable accommodations to employees who are limited by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. This requirement extends to known limitations related to pregnancy, even if they are not on the level of a disabling condition.
Employers must also conspicuously post a new workplace notice, and provide copies (1) to existing employees as of June 29, 2020, (2) at time of hire, and (b) within 10 days of an employee informing them of their pregnancy status. A template notice is now available from the Oregon BOLI website.
Action Items
- Modify handbook and written policy documents for compliance with the Workplace Fairness Act by the prescribed deadline.
- Train supervisory staff on the interactive process for making pregnancy-related accommodations.
- Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Executive Orders Ban New Foreign Workers; Align Federal Contracting Practices
/in HR Alerts, UncategorizedAPPLIES TO
All Employers
EFFECTIVE
June 22, 2020 and August 3, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
On June 22, 2020, the Trump Administration issued an Executive Order banning travel and admission of foreign nationals into the U.S. under certain nonimmigrant visa categories. Individuals who are already lawfully present in the United States prior to the implementation of the Order are not affected by this ban, nor individuals who hold a currently valid nonimmigrant visa.
Most U.S. embassies and consulates have already suspended routine visa services and restricted entry points into the U.S. The effects of this travel ban will be most apparent once consulates reopen and resume issuing non-immigrant visas, as individuals abroad seeking H-1B, H-2B or H-4 visas (temporary workers), J visas (exchange visitors participating in education or certain child care industries), or L visas (intracompany transfers) will have visa applications refused.
The travel ban does not specify how extensions or changing of nonimmigrant status for individuals already present in the U.S. will be handled. For example, an employer may still be able to file a petition to hire an H-1B worker presently working at another employer.
On August 3, 2020, another Executive Order was issued to align with the June 22nd Order, to support hiring U.S. citizens and green card holders. Specifically, the Order requires federal agencies to review 2018 and 2019 federal contracts to determine if they used temporary foreign labor or offshore labor for jobs that were once in the U.S., and whether doing so impacted opportunities for U.S. workers as well as any potential effects on national security. Federal agencies must issue a report of findings within 120 days to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget for review and who may recommend changes and presidential action if deemed necessary. There was also a call to action for the Departments of Labor and Homeland Security to protect United States workers from any adverse effects on wages and working conditions caused by the employment of H-1B visa holders within 45 days of the Order.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
U.S. DOL Issues Opinion Letters on Outside Sales, FLSA Exemptions, and Third-Party Wage Payments
/in HR Alerts, UncategorizedAPPLIES TO
All Employers
EFFECTIVE
June 25, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued five new opinion letters in late June 2020, addressing potential exemptions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). A summary of key concepts from these letters is listed below.
Read more
Supreme Court Broadens Ministerial Exception to Employment Discrimination Claims
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
Faith-Based Organizations
EFFECTIVE
July 8, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Employees classified under the “ministerial exception” because they perform religious functions within their job may be precluded from making employment discrimination claims against the religious entities that employ them. In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrisey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded the exception analysis into a review of all the circumstances, rather than limiting it to a specific test.
In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court used four factors to determine whether an employee’s role is ministerial: (1) formal job position title, (2) substance of the position based on the title, (3) the employee’s use of the title, and (4) the religious functions the employee performed for the religious institution. In Our Lady, the 9th Circuit stated that all four factors must be met to qualify for the exemption. Upon review, the Supreme Court said that these four factors were not meant to be a “rigid formula,” and that courts should “take all relevant circumstances into account.”
There, employee teachers taught academics and religion at Catholic schools to elementary-aged children and attended religious services with the children. The teachers were subsequently terminated based on alleged poor performance, and they brought discrimination suits against their employers. The Court considered the teachers’ actual duties and the fact that the schools “expressly saw [them] as playing a vital part in carrying out the mission of the church” in ultimately stating that they qualified for the exception. The fact that they did not have a “minister” job title was not determinative.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
California: Commuting Time may be Compensable – Depending on Certain Factors
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with CA Employees
EFFECTIVE
June 2, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
In Oliver v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA, Inc., a California court stated that an employee’s commuting time to the first worksite of the day may be compensable time, depending on the level of control an employer exerts on the employee’s commute, and whether the employee may use commuting time for personal pursuits as well as business operations.
In Oliver, employees alleged that the employer needed to pay for the time and expense spent commuting to the worksite, because the employees were required to transport tools and equipment in their personal vehicles to the worksite, constituting a sufficient level of employer “control” over their commute time to equate it to working hours. Upon closer review, it was determined that there is no singular “bright line” test to determine if a commute must be compensated. Rather, an employer must examine any factors that limit or exert an employer’s control over an employee’s commuting time. For example:
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Colorado: New Law Implements Mandatory Three-Pronged Paid Sick Leave Requirements
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with CO Employees
EFFECTIVE
As Indicated
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
On July 15, 2020, the Health Families & Workplaces Act (HWFA) went into effect, instituting a three-part mandatory statewide paid sick leave requirement on all employers. The three types of paid sick leave include COVID-19 emergency paid sick leave, paid sick and safe time, and public health emergency paid sick leave. Some provisions have a delayed effective date.
Read more
Florida: E-Verify Will Be Mandatory in 2021
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with FL Employees
EFFECTIVE
January 1, 2021
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Beginning January 1, 2021, SB 664 requires employers to verify an individual’s employment eligibility after accepting an offer of employment, either by using the E-Verify system or completing Form I-9. Documentation must be retained for at least three years after the initial date of employment. Employers are not required to verify the employment eligibility of an employee hired before 2021, but must verify employment upon renewal or extension of an employment contract. Compliance creates a rebuttable presumption that a private employer did not knowingly employ an unauthorized alien, and protects employers from criminal or civil liability under state law where the employment verification process indicated that the individual was authorized to work in the U.S.
All public employers must register and use the E-Verify system to verify work authorization status. All state contractors and subcontractors must also use E-Verify. Subcontractors must verify in writing that they do not employ unauthorized aliens. State contractors must retain the subcontractor’s affidavit for the duration of the contract. Public employers, contractors, and subcontractors who have a good faith belief that a contracted party is violating these requirements, they must terminate the contracts immediately. Contract termination under this provision is not considered a breach of contract.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Oregon: BOLI Issues Model Notices for Anti-Discrimination/Harassment and Pregnancy Accommodations
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with OR Employees
EFFECTIVE
As Indicated
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industry (BOLI) has released model notices for two laws whose notice requirements have very recently or will soon be going into effect. These are the Workplace Fairness Act, which covers anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies, and the Pregnancy Accommodation notice.
Workplace Fairness Act. Last year, the Oregon legislature passed the Workplace Fairness Act, which implemented various anti-discrimination and anti-harassment protections. Among these was the requirement for employers to adopt a written anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policy no later than October 1, 2020. The policy must contain specific information, including:
The Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries has released a template policy that covers all topics required by the Act, available on the sexual harassment page of its website. Employers may utilize this template or create their own policy. The final policy must be distributed to all employees, provided to new employees at time of hire, and provided to an employee who reports information about alleged prohibited conduct.
Pregnancy Accommodation Notice. Effective January 1, 2020, Oregon employers of six or more employees must provide reasonable accommodations to employees who are limited by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. This requirement extends to known limitations related to pregnancy, even if they are not on the level of a disabling condition.
Employers must also conspicuously post a new workplace notice, and provide copies (1) to existing employees as of June 29, 2020, (2) at time of hire, and (b) within 10 days of an employee informing them of their pregnancy status. A template notice is now available from the Oregon BOLI website.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
South Carolina: New Lactation Break Requirements
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with SC Employees
EFFECTIVE
August 24, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
The South Carolina Lactation Support Act (the “Act”) requires employers in South Carolina to make reasonable efforts to provide employees time and space to express breast milk for a one-year period following a nursing child’s birth. The Act brings South Carolina’s local law in alignment with federal requirements to provide lactation accommodations, with some minor differences.
Employers must provide both exempt and non-exempt employees reasonable break time to express milk, or allow employees to utilize existing paid break or mealtime to do so. Where possible, lactation breaks should run concurrently with existing employer-provided break time. Employers are also responsible for providing a private location for a lactating employee’s use. The Act clarifies that employers need not build a separate room, but the private location cannot be a toilet stall and should be in close proximity to the lactating employee’s work area. Employers may be exempt from providing lactation breaks if doing so would cause an unreasonable burden.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Virginia: NEW COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with VA Employees
EFFECTIVE
July 27, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Virginia is the first state in the country to implement an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for managing COVID-19. It went into effect on July 27, 2020. Employers must assess the “exposure risk level” of disease-related hazards in the workplace defined as “very high,” “high,” “medium,” and “lower,” and the top three classifications must implement an infectious disease preparedness and response plan. Employers who comply with (unidentified) CDC publications to mitigate COVID-19 related risks are deemed to have complied with the ETS. All employers must also:
There are additional requirements for jobs classified as medium, high, or very high exposure risk. Employers in the top three classifications have specific training requirements, including 30 days after the ETS effective date to implement training requirements on the ETS and 60 days to implement training requirements on the employer’s infectious disease preparedness and response plan. Finally, employers are prohibited from discriminating against employees exercising their rights under the ETS.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Washington: New Overtime Exemption Rules
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with WA Employees
EFFECTIVE
July 1, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
The Washington Department of Labor & Industries (DOLI) made changes to the minimum salary level and the job duties test for overtime exempt classifications. Although the salary level change went into effect July 1, 2020, the federal minimum level requirement is higher and must be followed until January 1, 2021 when the state minimum requirement will be higher at $827 per week ($43,004 annually) for small employers and $965 per week ($50,180 annually) for large employers. Eventually, the requirement will increase to 2.5 times the state minimum wage by 2028.
Additionally, the job duties test has been adjusted to align more closely with the federal job duties test, focusing on actual duties rather than job title or description. There is now one, rather than two, job duties test per exemption category. A main departure from the federal overtime exemption is that state rules do not permit a highly-compensated employee exemption.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase