|
APPLIES TO
All Employers with ID Employees
|
EFFECTIVE
July 1, 2020 |
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
|
July brings two new updates for Idaho employers with regard to driving and workers’ compensation coverage.
Cell Phone Use and Distracted Driving Prohibitions. Effective July 1, 2020, an individual may not operate a motor vehicle while using a mobile electronic device. Exceptions to this new law are for public or consumer-owned utility employee or contractors acting within the scope of their employment when responding to a utility emergency. Infractions are punishable by monetary fines; however, infractions will not be issued until January 1, 2021. Warnings may be given after July 1, 2020, with fines following infractions after the new year.
Unemployment and Workers’ Compensation. Also effective July 1, 2020, the Idaho Code has been updated to add a “good cause” provision to the unemployment and experience rate calculation. Situations “with good cause but for reasons not attributable to such covered employer” have been added to the list under which no charge will be made to the covered employer’s account.
Additionally, the deadline to submit forms to exempt corporate officers from workers’ compensation coverage has been changed. Employers must submit the exemption forms by March 31st. The forms remain in effect for at least two calendar years.
- Have driving policies updated to reflect lawful cell phone usage.
- Review workers’ compensation updates with your carrier.
- Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Idaho: New Distracted Driving Law, Update to Workers’ Comp Exemption Deadline
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with ID Employees
EFFECTIVE
July 1, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
July brings two new updates for Idaho employers with regard to driving and workers’ compensation coverage.
Cell Phone Use and Distracted Driving Prohibitions. Effective July 1, 2020, an individual may not operate a motor vehicle while using a mobile electronic device. Exceptions to this new law are for public or consumer-owned utility employee or contractors acting within the scope of their employment when responding to a utility emergency. Infractions are punishable by monetary fines; however, infractions will not be issued until January 1, 2021. Warnings may be given after July 1, 2020, with fines following infractions after the new year.
Unemployment and Workers’ Compensation. Also effective July 1, 2020, the Idaho Code has been updated to add a “good cause” provision to the unemployment and experience rate calculation. Situations “with good cause but for reasons not attributable to such covered employer” have been added to the list under which no charge will be made to the covered employer’s account.
Additionally, the deadline to submit forms to exempt corporate officers from workers’ compensation coverage has been changed. Employers must submit the exemption forms by March 31st. The forms remain in effect for at least two calendar years.
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Waterloo, Iowa: Expansive Ban-the-Box Now in Effect
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with 15+ Waterloo, IA Employees
EFFECTIVE
July 1, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Despite legal challenges, the City of Waterloo’s Ban-the-Box Ordinance went into effect as scheduled on July 1, 2020. It prohibits employers from inquiring in any manner into an applicant’s criminal history prior to a conditional offer of employment, unless the applicant voluntarily discloses such information before an offer is made. The ordinance also places limitations on when employers can make employment decisions or rescind offers of employment.
Read more
Chicago, IL: New Amendments Expand Paid Sick Leave to More Employees
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with 1+ IL Employee
EFFECTIVE
July 1, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Illinois has had a statewide paid sick leave ordinance in place since July 1, 2017, which has since been amended multiple times. The Chicago City Council recently approved Substitute Ordinance 2020-2343, which contains anti-retaliation provisions related to COVID-19 and also revises amendments previously enacted in December 2019. The Substitute Ordinance broadens the applicability of Chicago’s paid sick leave provisions to more classes of employees, thereby expanding employer responsibilities.
Under the original ordinance and the December 2019 amendments, certain types of employees were not covered by the paid sick leave ordinance. This includes:
Substitute Ordinance 2020-2343 now covers these employees under the paid sick leave ordinance, meaning they must be provided applicable paid sick leave and given notice of their rights alongside the first paycheck subject to the paid sick leave ordinance.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Kansas: Businesses Protected from Liability in Response to COVID-19 Claims
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
Employers with KS Employees, as indicated
EFFECTIVE
August 7, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Kansas House Bill No. 2016 creates the COVID-19 Response and Reopening for Business Liability Protection Act, providing individuals or agents conducting business in Kansas with immunity from civil actions for COVID-19 claims under specified circumstances. The Act also provides immunity for specific businesses, such as healthcare providers and adult care facilities. These provisions are generally intended to provide business owners with some protection from COVID-19 related claims when the businesses are acting on behalf of, or in compliance with, local statute and public health emergency directives.
Read more
Maryland: Summer Employment Law Updates
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with MD Employees
EFFECTIVE
October 1, 2020, unless otherwise noted below
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Maryland’s summer legislative updates include important changes to employer responsibilities in the wage transparency and paid sick leave domains, as well as amended requirements for state-level WARN Act requirements. A brief summary of these updates are listed below.
Read more
New York: Paid Voting Leave Rules Changed Back
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with NY Employees
EFFECTIVE
April 3, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
In April 2019, New York Election Law § 3-110 changed voting leave for employees to three hours of paid time off to vote, provided a request is made at least two working days prior to an election. However, in the state’s yearly budget for 2020, the legislature reverted the leave back to the previous rules.
Specifically, only two hours of paid voting leave is now required if an employee, who is a registered voter, does not have a four hour window to vote before or after a shift. Employees who do not have sufficient time to vote are allowed to take as much time off to vote as needed, but only two hours of that time must be paid. Employers may still designate that voting leave be taken at the beginning or end of an employee’s shift.
Employees must notify employers of the need for voting leave at least two, but no more than 10, working days before election day. Employers must also post a notice of employee voting leave rights in a conspicuous location where it can be seen as employees arrive at or leave the workplace. The notice must be posted at least 10 days before an election until the close of the polls on election day.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Rhode Island: Court Affirms When Employers May Conduct “Reasonable Grounds” Drug Testing
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with RI Employees
EFFECTIVE
May 29, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Rhode Island’s drug testing law allows employers to have employees undergo drug testing when the employer has “reasonable grounds” to believe that the employee may be under the influence of a controlled substance impairing their ability to perform their job. In a recent case, the Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed that the “reasonable grounds” standard can apply even where there is another possible explanation for an employee’s impaired behavior.
Read more
Virginia: Pregnancy Accommodations, Pay Transparency, and Marijuana Decriminalization
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
Varies; See Below
EFFECTIVE
July 1, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
In April of 2020, the Virginia legislature passed a number of bills affecting employee rights, such as LGBT anti-discrimination, wage theft prevention measures, and more. In addition to these bills, there are further updates for Virginia employers to be aware of this summer.
Read more
July Updates
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
Varies
EFFECTIVE
Varies
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Read more
U.S. Supreme Court Protects LGBTQ+ Rights in the Workplace
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers subject to Title VII
EFFECTIVE
June 15, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
In Bostock v. Clayton County, the U.S. Supreme Court said that sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and transgender status. The Court stated that “[a]n employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex.”
Read more