URGENT! California: Statewide Paid Sick Leave Relaunched

APPLIES TO

All Employers with 26+ CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

March 29, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Recently enacted SB 95 relaunched California’s statewide emergency paid sick leave (EPSL). Even though the bill is effective as of March 29th, it is retroactive back to January 1, 2021. Employers with more than 25 employees are subject to the current rules. Employees (not independent contractors) are eligible for leave if they are unable to work or telework because of one of the following reasons:

Read more

FFCRA Revamp – What Employers Should Know

APPLIES TO

Employers with fewer than 500 employees

EFFECTIVE

March 11, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Congress recently enacted the American Rescue Plan Act, extending the tax credits for the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) paid leave provisions. Although FFCRA leave is still not required, if employers want to voluntarily take advantage of the tax benefits, there are new rules to take into consideration.

Beginning April 1, 2021, employers may voluntarily provide a new bank of 10 days’ emergency paid sick leave to employees and receive the tax credit for it through September 30, 2021. The Rescue Plan also expands the reasons for taking emergency paid sick leave and emergency family and medical leave to include:

  • An employee is seeking or awaiting the results of a diagnostic test for, or a medical diagnosis of, COVID–19 and such employee has been exposed to COVID–19 or the employee’s employer has requested such test or diagnosis.
  • An employee is obtaining immunization related to COVID–19 or recovering from any injury, disability, illness, or condition related to such immunization. (This benefit may support employer vaccination programs.) Read more

DOL Opinions and Rules Still in Flux

APPLIES TO

All Employers

EFFECTIVE

As Indicated

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is still working through opinion letters issued during the Trump Administration. Most recently, on February 19, 2021, the DOL withdrew a couple of opinions, including:

  • FLSA2019-6 | Further clarification of a “retail or service establishment” for purposes of overtime exemption.
  • FLSA2019-10 | Compensability of time spent in a truck’s sleeper berth. Note that to the extent that FLSA2019-10 withdrew prior opinion letters, those letters are reinstated.

Additionally, the DOL recently announced plans to withdraw the Independent Contractor Final Rule, issued by the department on issued on January 7, 2021, because it is not consistent with current case law. It also intends to rescind a current regulation on joint employer relationships under the Fair Labor Standards Act, published in the Federal Register and which took effect on March 16, 2020, in light of current litigation against the rules that vacated most of the regulations.

Action Items

  1. Have policies and procedures updated consistent with these ongoing changes.
  2. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2021 ManagEase

7th Circuit: Employers May be Required to Pay for USERRA Leave

APPLIES TO

All Employers with IL, IN, and WI Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 3, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In White v. United Airlines, Inc., the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal stated that employers must provide paid leave for USERRA leave to the extent similar nonmilitary leave is paid by the employer. The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), in part, protects workers from discrimination based on their military status. More specifically here, USERRA requires that an employee on leave from work while performing their military service be entitled to the same rights and benefits as the employer provides to other employees on leave.

Read more

9th Circuit: State Wage Statement Rules Apply to Interstate Transportation Workers Based in California

APPLIES TO

Employers with AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA, Guam,
and the Northern Mariana Islands Interstate Transportation Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 2, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Ward v. United Airlines, Inc., the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that wage statement requirements under Labor Code § 226 are not preempted by federal law. There, airline pilot and flight attendant employees claimed they did not receive wage statements that complied with California law.

Read more

9th Circuit: California Labor Laws May Apply to Aviation Workers

APPLIES TO

Aviation Employers with AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA,
Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 23, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Bernstein v. Virgin America, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that California’s wage and hour laws are not preempted by federal law in the aviation context. Specifically, employees there alleged that Virgin failed to pay state minimum wage, overtime, and for every hour worked; failed to provide required meal periods, rest breaks, and accurate wage statements; failed to pay waiting time penalties; and violated the Unfair Competition Law.  Employees also sought compensation under the California Labor Code’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA).

Read more

Arizona: Anti-Discrimination Laws Expanded to Prohibit Pregnancy Discrimination

APPLIES TO

All Employers with 15+ AZ Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 19, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On February 4, 2021, Arizona Governor Ducey signed House Bill 2045 into law, amending the Arizona Civil Rights Act definition of the phrase “on the basis of sex” to protect workers from pregnancy or childbirth-related discrimination.  This Civil Rights Act applies to employers of fifteen or more employees.

Like other pregnancy anti-discrimination provisions, the amended Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from discriminating against employees affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.  Such employees must be treated the same way as non-pregnant employees with similar limitations in their ability to work.

This amendment brings the Arizona Civil Rights Act in alignment with the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act.  It also grants the Arizona Civil Rights Division the authority to investigate pregnancy discrimination charges filed by employees.

Action Items

  1. Have anti-discrimination policies updated where applicable.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on the anti-discrimination protections.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2021 ManagEase

California: Rounding Time is OUT!!!

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 25, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC, the California Supreme Court said that rounding timekeeping practices cannot be used for purposes of applying meal period premiums. Interestingly, the Court did not say that rounding in general was prohibited, but the ruling essentially makes rounding obsolete.

Read more

Colorado: Emergency Paid Sick Leave Clarified

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CO Employees

EFFECTIVE

April 14, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On February 23, 2021, the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) clarified employers’ public health emergency leave (“PHEL”) obligations under the Healthy Families and Workplaces Act (HFWA).

First, employers must provide employees access to up to 80 hours of PHEL for full-time employees, and an equivalent amount to part-time employees based on the number of hours part-time employees work in a 14-day period. The rules clarified that part-time employees receive PHEL in “the greater of the number of hours the employee (a) is scheduled for work or paid leave in the 14-day period after the leave request, or (b) actually worked in the 14-day period prior to the declaration of the public health emergency or the leave request, whichever is later.”

Additionally, there was some question about whether newly hired employees would be entitled to PHEL. Because PHEL eligibility is tied to when an employee requests leave, all employees are entitled to PHEL regardless of their date of hire. Employers should review these changes immediately as they do not change existing rules, but merely clarify current requirements.

Action Items

  1. Have leave policies updated consistent with current rules.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on clarified leave benefits.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2021 ManagEase

Minnesota: Handbook Disclaimers May not Preclude PTO Policy from Forming a Contract

APPLIES TO

All Employers with MN Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 3, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Hall v. City of Plainview, the Minnesota Supreme Court reviewed whether general disclaimers contained in the employer’s handbook would be sufficient to prevent a PTO policy from forming a contract with employees.

Read more