|
APPLIES TO
|
EFFECTIVE
July 29, 2020 |
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
|
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) stated in a recent case that employer policies preventing employees from linking to employer websites from personal blogs was under lawful Boeing Category 1(a), which refers to a set of standards used to determine if employer policies interfere with employees’ NLRA-protected rights.
Boeing Category 1(a), arising from a 2017 case involving The Boeing Company, includes rules the NLRB deems permissible for employers to maintain because (1) when reasonably interpreted, the rule does not prohibit or interfere with exercising NLRA-protected rights, or (2) the potential adverse impact on protected rights is outweighed by justifications associated with the rule.
In Shamrock Foods Co., the NLRB stated that a policy discouraging employees from linking to an employer’s website from a personal blog fell into this category. The NLRB reasoned that the policy was intended to protect the company’s brand identity, integrity, and reputation, and to minimize the impression that the employee is endorsed by or speaking on behalf of the employer, and not to restrict employees’ NLRA-protected rights.
Action Items
- Have policies and handbooks reviewed consistent with the ruling.
- Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Employers Can Prohibit Employees from Linking to Employer Websites from Personal Blogs
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers
EFFECTIVE
July 29, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) stated in a recent case that employer policies preventing employees from linking to employer websites from personal blogs was under lawful Boeing Category 1(a), which refers to a set of standards used to determine if employer policies interfere with employees’ NLRA-protected rights.
Boeing Category 1(a), arising from a 2017 case involving The Boeing Company, includes rules the NLRB deems permissible for employers to maintain because (1) when reasonably interpreted, the rule does not prohibit or interfere with exercising NLRA-protected rights, or (2) the potential adverse impact on protected rights is outweighed by justifications associated with the rule.
In Shamrock Foods Co., the NLRB stated that a policy discouraging employees from linking to an employer’s website from a personal blog fell into this category. The NLRB reasoned that the policy was intended to protect the company’s brand identity, integrity, and reputation, and to minimize the impression that the employee is endorsed by or speaking on behalf of the employer, and not to restrict employees’ NLRA-protected rights.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Georgia: Employers Must Provide Paid Lactation Breaks
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with GA Employees
EFFECTIVE
August 11, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
A new piece of legislation, Georgia House Bill 1090, requires employers to provide paid lactation breaks and a private space to express breast milk, effective immediately. Previously, employers had the option to provide unpaid break time for nursing employees to express breast milk, and were not required to provide any particular location for the employee’s use during lactation breaks.
With the new regulations, employers are now required to provide reasonable break time for employees to pump at the worksite during work hours. Lactation breaks must be paid at the employee’s regular rate of pay. Employers are further prohibited from requiring use of paid leave or reduction of salary to offset time taken off to express breast milk.
Additionally, employers are required to provide a private location other than a restroom for employees to express breast milk.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Louisiana: Updates to Employee Noncompete Agreements
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with LA Employees
EFFECTIVE
August 1, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Noncompete agreements are prohibited in Louisiana unless certain exceptions are met. For employers, an agreement that restricts employees “from carrying on or engaging in a business similar to that of the employer” and/or “from soliciting customers of the employer” is permitted, but only: (1) within an expressly identified territory consisting of specified parish(es), municipalit(ies), or their parts, provided that the employer engages in a like business there, and (2) not exceeding a period of two years from termination of employment.
Additionally, a corporation, partnership, or limited liability company may enter into agreements with their shareholders, partners, and LLC members to restrict them from taking equity stakes in a competing business (as shareholders, partners, or members) and/or merely becoming employees with the competing business.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
Massachusetts: PFML Rules are Final!
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with MA Employees
EFFECTIVE
July 24, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Employers must begin providing Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) to employees on January 1, 2021. The Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave (DFML) recently released the final regulations for PFML with some changes.
There were numerous changes to rules surrounding employers opting for private plans. Key changes to note include:
The final rules also discuss requirements when transitioning between private and state-sponsored plans. An employer that does not renew a private plan must continue to provide paid leave benefits to covered individuals under the same terms and conditions of the private plan for the entire duration of the leave if the claim was initiated under the private plan prior to its termination. In the case of intermittent leave, the private plan must maintain coverage until the end of the employee’s benefit year.
Read more
Nevada: New COVID-19 Related Worker Safety Requirements for Hospitality Employers
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
Public Accommodations Facilities in
Nevada Counties of 100,000+ People
EFFECTIVE
Varies; See Below
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
As of August 11, 2020, SB 4 imposes new COVID-19 related worker safety requirements for certain employers, including limited-time protocols for mitigating transmission, cleaning facilities, implementing a response plan, mandated testing in specific circumstances, and paid time off. The director of the Department of Health and Human Services adopted corresponding regulations on August 31, 2020.
Eligibility. The new rules come with moderately complex eligibility provisions. First, the new protocols apply to public accommodations facilities, defined as hotel and casinos, resorts, hotels, motels, hostels, bed and breakfast facilities or other facility offering rooms or areas to the public for financial consideration. Next, SB 4 applies only to counties with a population of 100,000 or more individuals, such as Clark and Washoe counties. Finally, the director’s regulations apply (1) during any period of public health emergency due to SARS-CoV-2 as declared by the Governor, (2) any day that the positive rate of COVID-19 testing for any county exceeds 5% in a 14-day rolling period within the previous 90 days, or (3) any day the number of new cases in the county exceeds 100 per 100,000 residents in the same time periods.
Read more
New Mexico: COVID-19 Cases Must be Reported to NM OSHA Within Four Hours
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers with NM Employees
EFFECTIVE
August 5, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
OSHA requires employers to provide notice of certain injuries and illnesses within eight to 24 hours, depending on the type and severity, and to record all work-related injuries and illnesses. Currently, COVID-19 cases must be reported if they are work-related. However, some states have individual state-level OSHA plans with more stringent requirements. New Mexico falls into this category, and an emergency amendment to its injury and illness reporting regulations imparts a new temporary reporting requirement for COVID-19 cases.
Specifically, employers are required to report any cases in which an employee tests positive for COVID-19 within four hours of learning about the diagnosis, even if the illness is not work-related. This emergency amendment remains in effect for 120 days, unless it is later made permanent.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase
September Updates
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
Varies
EFFECTIVE
Varies
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
Read more
IMPORTANT: Federal District Court Strikes Down Parts of the FFCRA’s Rules!
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers Subject to the FFCRA
EFFECTIVE
August 3, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
When the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued its Final Rule implementing the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), the State of New York filed suit against the DOL claiming that parts of the Final Rule exceeded the DOL’s authority. As a result, the federal district court judge recently invalidated parts of the Final Rule.
Read more
COVID-19: CDC Issues New Return to Work Guidelines Following Infection or Exposure
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers
EFFECTIVE
June 13, 2020 and July 20, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
On July 20, 2020, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) revised its guidelines for when employees may return to work following infection or exposure to COVID-19. For non-healthcare settings, changes were made to the symptom-based strategy:
Read more
ICE Extends Remote I-9 Compliance 30 More Days; No Extension on Notices of Inspections from March
/in HR AlertsAPPLIES TO
All Employers
EFFECTIVE
July 18, 2020
QUESTIONS?
Contact HR On-Call
(888) 378-2456
In order to safely accommodate distancing and remote teleworking during the pandemic, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced special flexibility for employers with regard to completing the physical inspection component of the Form I-9 Section 2. This accommodation was originally set to expire on May 19, but was extended in May and June, and has been extended once more. The new expiration date for the remote inspection of identifying documents accommodation is now August 19, 2020.
On the other hand, ICE also announced that there would be no further extensions granted to employers who received notices of inspection (NOI) from the agency during the month of March 2020. Previously, employers who were served NOIs during March and had not yet responded were granted an automatic 60-day extension from the effective date. However, no further extensions have been granted.
Action Items
Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.
© 2020 ManagEase