Posts

Connecticut: Overtime for a Fluctuating Work Week Schedule is Calculated Based on State Law

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CT Employees

EFFECTIVE

August 17, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Williams v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc., the Connecticut Supreme Court recently stated that employers must calculate overtime for a fluctuating work week (“FWW”) schedule based on state, rather than federal, overtime rules.

There, GNC followed federal rules and divided the employees’ weekly pay by the actual number of hours the employees worked in that week to determine the employees’ regular rate of pay. However, the court stated that Connecticut requires employers to divide weekly pay by the number of hours the employees usually work each week, rather than actual hours.  In following the federal model, the GNC employees would always work over 40 actual hours per week when overtime is involved.  Thus, the number of actual hours would be greater than the usual hours worked, and the resulting calculation for the regular rate of pay would always be lower than if the usual hours were used to calculate rates.

Connecticut employers with FWW schedules should review overtime calculation methods to ensure compliance with the recent ruling.

Action Items

  1. Read the text of Connecticut Supreme Court’s opinion here.
  2. Review overtime calculations for compliance with state overtime rules.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2017 ManagEase, Incorporated.

Oregon: Changes to Manufacturing Overtime Rules (Again)

APPLIES TO

All Employers with OR Employees in Manufacturing Industries

EFFECTIVE

August 8, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Early this year, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (“BOLI”) published a new interpretation of how employers must calculate overtime hours for employees in a mill, factory, or manufacturing establishment.  This interpretation was swiftly overturned by a county court.  Now, Governor Kate Brown has signed H.B. 3458 into law, which codifies the applicable method to calculate overtime for these employees.

Ninth Circuit: Wage Rates Used for Overtime Hours Cannot Be Lower Than Those Used for Non-Overtime Hours

APPLIES TO

All Employers with AK, AZ, CA, GU, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR and WA Employees

EFFECTIVE

March 21, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Brunozzi v. Cable Communications, Inc., the Ninth Circuit stated that wage rates cannot be decreased in weeks when overtime is worked, as compared to weeks when no overtime is worked. There, two cable technicians were paid a piece rate per cable system installed, plus a contractually-based production bonus each pay period as part of their regular wages.  When the employer calculated overtime, it reduced the production bonus by the amount of overtime paid for piece rate work, which meant that employees received lower wage rates than when they did not work overtime.

Eleventh Circuit: Commissions Paid Only Apply to the Workweek in Which They Are Earned When Calculating Overtime Exemption Status

APPLIES TO

All Employers with AL, FL and GA Employees

EFFECTIVE

April 13, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Frexia v. Prestige Cruise Services, LLC, an employee alleged that his employer violated the FLSA because the employee’s compensation—a weekly fixed salary plus sales-based commission—fell below the overtime exemption threshold for certain weeks. The Eleventh Circuit’s review of the case confirmed that pay for work performed each workweek must be counted for that workweek, rather than counted across a span of several weeks, in order to meet the overtime exemption threshold.

Oregon: Manufacturer Employers Must Count Both Daily and Weekly Overtime

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Oregon Employees
in the Manufacturing Industry

EFFECTIVE

January 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Between December 2016 and January 2017, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (“BOLI”) changed its interpretation of overtime hours for employees in a mill, factory, or manufacturing establishment.  A “manufacturing establishment” is “any place where machinery is used for ‘manufacturing purposes’” under specified circumstances.

Judge Blocks White Collar Overtime Exemption Rule from Taking Effect Nationwide

APPLIES TO

All Employers

EFFECTIVE

November 22, 2016

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Since the U.S. Department of Labor issued the finalized White Collar Overtime Exemption Rule (the “Rule”) in May this year, employers across the country have been preparing to comply with the Rule’s requirement for white collar employees to earn $47,476 annually in order to maintain exemption status rather than being paid overtime.  In an eleventh hour ruling, just days before its effective date of December 1st, a Texas federal judge ordered a preliminary injunction on the Rule, preventing the Rule from going into effect nationally on its slated December 1st start date.  The Rule was expected to result in millions of workers either (a) being re-classified as non-exempt, and therefore entitled to wage and hour protections, including overtime pay; or (b) receiving dramatic salary increases to keep workers classified as exempt.

States and Businesses Sue, Attempt to Halt Federal Overtime Rule

APPLIES TO

All Employers

EFFECTIVE

N/A

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Recently, 21 states and a coalition of business groups filed lawsuits attempting to challenge the impending federal overtime rule, which is currently scheduled to become effective on December 1, 2016.  The new overtime rule will increase the salary test for exempt professionals to $47,476 per year for a full-time employee, over double the current salary threshold.

California: Overtime Pay Regulations Expanded for Agricultural Employees

APPLIES TO

All Employers with California Employees in Agricultural Industries

EFFECTIVE

Varies; see below

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On September 12, 2016, Governor Brown signed AB 1066, a bill that will significantly expand overtime rights for California employees in the agricultural industry.  Currently, agricultural employees do not earn overtime until they complete over 10 hours of work in one day.  Beginning January 1, 2019, AB 1066 will lower the 10-hour threshold for overtime rates by a half-hour each year, reaching alignment with the standard eight-hour workday by 2022. The bill also phases in a 40-hour standard workweek. Further, as of January 1, 2022, any agricultural employee working in excess of 12 hours in one day must be compensated at a rate of twice their regular pay.

Eighth Circuit: Guidance on Overtime Hours When Calculating Intermittent FMLA Leave Benefits

APPLIES TO

Employers with Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota Employees

EFFECTIVE

August 4, 2016

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Tracking intermittent leaves can be an administrative headache.  For one company,  “voluntary” overtime compounded that difficulty.  In Hernandez v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (“BATO”), the Eighth Circuit provided guidance on determining when overtime becomes mandatory for the purpose of calculating intermittent FMLA leave benefits.

August Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This HR Alert addresses the following topics:
  1. Legislation Aimed to Ease the Upcoming Federal Overtime Exemption Regulations
  2. OSHA Posting Requirement Extended to November 1, 2016
  3. Department of Labor Increases Civil Penalties for Violations of Law
  4. IRS Clarifies Tax Treatment of Wellness Reimbursements and Incentives
  5. EEOC Updates Equal Pay Data Rule, Requires More Detailed EEO-1 Reporting for 2017
  6. California: Public Works Contractors and Subcontractors Must Submit Certified Payroll Records Again
  7. District of Columbia: Guide Regarding Transgender Workers Published
  8. Nevada: REMINDER – Workplace Posters Changed July 1, 2016
  9. New Jersey: “Marital Status” Refers to All Types of Marital Status
  10. New York City, New York: Single-Occupant Restrooms Must be Labeled Gender-Neutral

Read more