Posts

Pennsylvania: New Overtime Rule Increases Exempt Salary Threshold

APPLIES TO

All Employers with PA Employees

EFFECTIVE

Pending

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On January 31, 2020, Pennsylvania’s Independent Regulatory Review Commission approved a final regulation that increases the exempt salary threshold, extending overtime eligibility to more workers. The final regulation includes annual increases in 2021 and 2022, with adjustments following every three years thereafter. The regulation will formally go into effect once approved by the state Attorney General.

Read more

March Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. Second Circuit: ERISA Plans Can Be Modified Absent Fraud or Mistake
  2. 10th Circuit: Colorado Home Healthcare Workers are Not Entitled to Overtime
  3. California: Wage and Hour Concerns for Coronavirus
  4. California:  Emergency Wildfire Smoke Regulations Renewed Again
  5. Denver, CO: Anti-Discrimination Protections Expanded
  6. District of Columbia: Notice Requirements for Paid Family Leave
  7. Illinois: Guidance Issued on Sexual Harassment Requirements
  8. Minneapolis, MN: Local Minimum Wage Law is Given a Green Light
  9. St. Louis, MO: Ban-the-Box in Effect for Private Employers
  10. New Mexico: Workers’ Comp Claim Doesn’t Apply to Tribal Casino
  11. New York: Statewide Salary History Ban FAQs
  12. New York City, NY: Contractors/Freelancers Must Receive Anti-Harassment and Discrimination Protection & Training
  13. Philadelphia, PA: Salary History Inquiry Ban is Back in Effect
  14. Columbia, SC: Criminal and Salary History Ordinance No Longer Applies to Private Employers

Read more

Third Circuit: Third Party Bonuses May Be Factored into the Regular Rate

APPLIES TO

All Employers with DE, NJ, and PA Employees

EFFECTIVE

August 20, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Department of Labor v. Bristol Excavating, Inc., the Third Circuit Court of Appeal stated that third-party bonuses may be required to be factored in the regular hourly rate for purposes of calculating overtime. The court said that the determinative factor is the agreement of “remuneration for employment” between the employer and employee, which must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Read more

Minnesota: Split-Day Overtime is Over

APPLIES TO

All Employers with MN Employees

EFFECTIVE

September 18, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In In re Minnesota Living Assistance, Inc., the Minnesota Supreme Court stated that employers cannot use split-day overtime to comply with state overtime rules, where employees have not yet worked the overtime hours meant to comply with state overtime rules. There, the employer paid employees one rate for the first 5.5 hours worked in a 16-hour day, and 1.5 times that rate for the remaining 10.5 hours. The Court stated that the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to pay employees overtime for all hours worked in excess of 48 in a week, regardless of whether the employee received time-and-a-half compensation during the first 48 hours worked.

Additionally, time-and-a-half wages paid during the first 48 hours worked in a workweek cannot be excluded when calculating an employee’s regular rate of pay, because those hours were not paid for overtime work (which are excluded when calculating the regular rate of pay). Because federal Fair Labor Standards Act overtime rules vary compared to the state rules, employers must take care to comply with both.

Action Items

  1. Review split-day overtime policies and procedures to ensure compliance with state wage and hour rules.
  2. Have payroll processes updated.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2019 ManagEase

December Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. 2020 Minimum Wage Increases for Federal Contractors
  2. Second Circuit: Sexual Harassment vs. Sex Discrimination
  3. Third Circuit: Blue Penciling Noncompete Agreements is Okay
  4. Sixth Circuit: Statute of Limitations Cannot be Shortened for Title VII Cases
  5. Ninth Circuit: Home Care Workers’ Overtime Rule Retroactive Effective Date Applied
  6. Tenth Circuit: FLSA Applies to Workers in Cannabis Industry
  7. California: Calculating Meal and Rest Premiums Clarified
  8. California: Mandatory Service Charges May be Gratuities
  9. Bernalillo County, NM: PTO Start Date Moved Up
  10. New York: Reproductive Health Decisions Protected
  11. New York City, NY: Guidance on National Origin/Immigrant Status-based Discrimination
  12. Oregon: Don’t Retaliate – Even After Termination
  13. Columbia, SC: Criminal and Salary History Inquiries Banned
  14. San Antonio, TX: Paid Sick Leave on Hold – Again

Read more

DOL Issues Final Rule on Changes to Overtime Exemptions

APPLIES TO

All Employers Subject to the FLSA

EFFECTIVE

January 1, 2020

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently issued the final rule updating the salary requirements for overtime exempt classifications. For executive, administrative, professional, and computer professional exemptions, the salary threshold will increase from $455 to $684 per week (equivalent to $35,568 per year). Where state overtime exemptions are more strict, the federal rule will not impact those jurisdictions.

Read more

Massachusetts: Commission-Only Workers Get Overtime

APPLIES TO

All Employers with MA Commission-Only Employees

EFFECTIVE

May 8, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Sullivan v. Sleepy’s LLC, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently stated that retail salespeople who are paid entirely in commissions or draws are entitled to separate and additional overtime or Sunday pay. There, employees who worked more than 40 hours in a week and on at least one Sunday, did not receive any additional compensation beyond their daily draw and commissions. Even though the compensation received always equaled or exceed the minimum wage and overtime and Sunday pay rates, the court stated that this was insufficient. Overtime and Sunday pay laws, as well as Department of Labor Standards’ (DLS) opinion letters, supported its interpretation.

Read more

March Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. U.S. Supreme Court Reversed Ninth Circuit Equal Pay Ruling Based on Judge’s Death
  2. Fifth Circuit: Restated Its Position that Title VII Does Not Protect Sexual Orientation
  3. California: Guidance on New Agricultural Overtime Pay Requirements
  4. Alameda, CA: City Minimum Wage Increases to $13.50 in July, Regardless of Employer Size
  5. Florida: Miami Beach Minimum Wage Struck Down
  6. Illinois: $9.25 Minimum Wage by January 2020, With New Possible Penalties
  7. Minneapolis, MN: Minimum Wage Increase Approved
  8. New Jersey: $10 Minimum Wage in July 2019, $15 by 2024
  9. Westchester County, New York: Bans the Box
  10. Portland, Oregon: Prohibits Discrimination Against Atheists and Agnostics
  11. West Virginia: Federal Law Enforcement Pension Freed From State Taxes

Read more

California: Employers Face New Hurdles with Independent Contractor Classifications

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

April 30, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (Lee), the California Supreme Court created a new test for determining whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor for purposes of wage and hour claims, making it one of the strictest standards in the country. A class action was filed against a delivery service employer who converted its employee drivers to independent contractors in 2004 for economic reasons. The class alleged, in part, that they were misclassified and Dynamex failed to pay overtime, provide itemized wage statements, and reimburse business expenses.

California: State Supreme Court Sets Formula to Calculate Overtime on Flat, Non-Production Bonuses

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

March 5, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp., the California Supreme Court stated that when calculating the per-hour value of a flat, non-production bonus for purposes of overtime, the total compensation must be divided by the number of non-overtime hours the employee actually worked during the pay period.