Posts

Georgia: “Key Employee” Clarified Under Restrictive Covenants Act

APPLIES TO

All Employers with GA Employees

EFFECTIVE

March 5, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Georgia Restrictive Covenants Act (GRCA) prohibits noncompete agreements with employees unless they “customarily and regularly” solicit customers or make sales, or are a “key employee.” In Blair v. Pantera Enters., Inc., the Georgia Court of Appeals provided clarity on what a key employee is. There, an employee left to work for a competitor and a client followed because of its relationship with the employee. The employee did not solicit customers or make sales, and the employer attempted to enforce the noncompete on the basis of being a key employee.

Read more

Eleventh Circuit: Joint Employer Standard Clarified Under the FLSA and Common Law

APPLIES TO

All Employers with AL, FL, and GA Employees

EFFECTIVE

August 2, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Garcia-Celestino v. Ruiz Harvesting, Inc., the Eleventh Circuit distinguished the joint employer standard under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and common law. Each standard turns on the applicable definition of “employee” and “control,” but are not the same. There, migrant workers under the H-2A visa program filed suit against their employer and a citrus grove owner for minimum wage violations under the FLSA and for breach of their contract, which was based on federal immigration statutes and regulations. The court looked at whether or not the citrus grove owner was a joint employer.

Eleventh Circuit: Valet Uniforms May Be “Materials” Requiring FLSA Coverage of Employees

APPLIES TO

Employers with AL, FL, and GA Employees

EFFECTIVE

June 29, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Asalde v. First Class Parking Sys. LLC, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal stated that a jury may determine whether valet uniforms meet the “materials” definition for “enterprise coverage” which would allow them the protections of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA applies, in part, to employers who have “employees handling, selling, or otherwise working on goods or materials that have been moved in or produced for [interstate or international] commerce by any person” and have an annual volume of business of at least $500,000. (Emphasis added.)

Georgia: Employees working with the Elderly Must Undergo Extensive Background Checks

APPLIES TO

All Employers with GA Employees Who Provide Care to Elderly or Disabled Adults

EFFECTIVE

October 1, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Effective October 1, 2019, the Georgia Long-Term Care Background Check Program imposes significantly greater background screening requirements on employers who hire individuals with direct access to elderly adults.  Abuse of the elderly and adults with disabilities has increased in recent years, and the new law is intended to help protect the vulnerable adult population.

Ninth Circuit: DOL’s 80/20 Tip Credit Rule is Invalid

APPLIES TO

All Employers of AK, AZ, CA, GA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA Employees

EFFECTIVE

September 6, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Department of Labor (“DOL”) permits employers to give a tip credit to tipped employees who spend no more than 20% of their time performing non-tipped duties. In Marsh v. J. Alexander’s, LLC, the Ninth Circuit noted that this rule is only found in the Field Operations Handbook used by the DOL as guidance for investigations by field officers, rather than in a statute or regulation; as a result, the court stated it was not valid.

September Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. The Recent Federal Overtime Exemption Rule is Diminishing
  2. NLRB: More Examples of What is or isn’t Protected Concerted Activities on Facebook
  3. EEOC Must Reconsider Wellness Regulations
  4. Seventh Circuit: EEOC May Investigate Despite Right-to-Sue Letter and Issue of Judgment
  5. Arizona, Maryland, Wyoming:  Now Part of the E-Verify RIDE Program
  6. Berkeley, CA: Minimum Wage Increase, Paid Sick Leave, and Work Schedule Rules Will Soon Be In Effect
  7. San Diego, CA:  Equal Pay Bill for City Contractors and Consultants
  8. Santa Clara, CA: Santa Clara City’s Minimum Wage to Increase in 2018
  9. Connecticut: Anti-Discrimination Protections Expanded for Veterans
  10. Georgia: Amended Law Now Preempts Predictive Scheduling Ordinances
  11. New Jersey:  Anti-Discrimination Protections for Military and Veterans Expanded
  12. New York: Guidance on Tax Treatment of PFL Contributions and Benefits now Available
  13. Nevada: Pregnant Workers’ Fairness Act Poster Now Available
  14. North Carolina:  Fair Classification Act Emphasizes State Focus on Proper Employee Classification
  15. Texas: Hurricane Harvey Relief for Employees
  16. Washington:  New Biometric Information Protection law

Read more

Georgia: New Kin Care Law; New Bill Protects On-Call Scheduling Practices

APPLIES TO

All Employers with GA Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 1, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Governor Nathan Deal recently signed two bills affecting employers of Georgia employees.  H.B. 243 is an employer-friendly bill addressing on-call scheduling practices, whereas S.B. 201 introduces kin care protections for employers that offer paid sick leave.  Both will become effective on July 1, 2017.

Eleventh Circuit: Commissions Paid Only Apply to the Workweek in Which They Are Earned When Calculating Overtime Exemption Status

APPLIES TO

All Employers with AL, FL and GA Employees

EFFECTIVE

April 13, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Frexia v. Prestige Cruise Services, LLC, an employee alleged that his employer violated the FLSA because the employee’s compensation—a weekly fixed salary plus sales-based commission—fell below the overtime exemption threshold for certain weeks. The Eleventh Circuit’s review of the case confirmed that pay for work performed each workweek must be counted for that workweek, rather than counted across a span of several weeks, in order to meet the overtime exemption threshold.

Eleventh Circuit: Race-Neutral Grooming Policy that Rejected Dreadlocks Was Not Disparate Treatment Discrimination

APPLIES TO

All Alabama, Florida and Georgia Employers

EFFECTIVE

September 15, 2016

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) sued an employer on behalf of a black applicant whose job offer was rescinded when she refused to change her dreadlock hairstyle.  On September 15, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit agreed with a district court’s dismissal of the alleged discrimination complaint.  The Court reasoned that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits adverse actions on the basis of immutable characteristics of race, whereas the dreadlocks hairstyle was a mutable choice.  This decision follows other courts in similarly rejecting the argument that hairstyles can be a “determinant of racial identity.”

June Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This HR Alert addresses the following topics:
  1. U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Rule on Contraceptive Coverage Decisions
  2. U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Revises Statute of Limitations on Constructive Discharge Claims
  3. EEOC Doubles Poster Violation Penalty Fine
  4. EEOC Provides Guide for Using Leave as a Reasonable Accommodation under ADA
  5. California Businesses Now Have Time to Fix Accessibility ADA Violations
  6. California Paid Sick Leave Coverage Expanded to In-Home Workers
  7. Los Angeles, CA Doubles Paid Sick Leave, Effective July 1, 2016
  8. Santa Monica, CA’s Paid Sick Leave Implementation Delayed to 2017
  9. Georgia: Franchisors are not Employers of Franchisees or Franchisees’ Workers
  10. Many Tennessee Employers Soon Required to Use E-Verify
  11. Vermont Passes Ban-the-Box Legislation

Read more