Fifth Circuit: Mandatory Class Action Waivers Do Not Violate the NLRA

In Convergys, the employer required all job applicants to sign a class action waiver, which was not in the context of an arbitration agreement. The National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) original decision in the matter was that the mandatory class action waiver violated Section 7 of the NLRA, which prohibits employers from interfering with an employee’s right to engage in protected concerted activities. The NLRB relied on a 2012 NLRB case (“Horton I”), even though the Fifth Circuit later denied enforcement of the Horton I decision in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB (“Horton II”).

Here, the Fifth Circuit stressed that the Horton II decision already rejected the NLRB’s position that Section 7 guarantees an employee the right to participate in class/collective actions.  Even absent an arbitration agreement, the court stated that the Horton II decision still applied and class action waivers are permissible because they are “contractual provisions” that do not impede upon substantive rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court is currently reviewing class action waivers in arbitration agreements. It is unclear at this time whether the Supreme Court’s decision will have an impact on the unique circumstances of this case.

Action Items

1. Review class action waivers in any form with legal counsel before requiring employees’ signatures.
2. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2017 ManagEase, Incorporated.