New York

New York: New Laws for 2026!

APPLIES TO

As Indicated

EFFECTIVE

As Indicated

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Paid family leave benefits are extended to include certain construction workers.
  • Disparate impact liability is recognized as a method of establishing unlawful discrimination under New York’s Human Rights Law.
  • Employers are prohibited from using reimbursement clauses or promissory notes as a condition of employment.
  • Amendments to the Healthy Terminals Act (Act) went into effect on January 1, 2026. Due to some confusion created by the amendments, the New York State Department of Labor issued implementation guidance and FAQs to address the most common questions.
  • Employers are prohibited from using consumer credit history checks in hiring, employment, and licensing determinations.

Discussion

Several laws were signed by Governor Hochul at the end of last year impacting requirements for employers in 2026. In addition, clarifying guidance was issued for laws that went into effect at the beginning of the new year. The most significant updates are summarized below.

 

Paid Family Leave for Construction Workers

 

Effective December 19, 2025, S50 extends paid family leave benefits to employees who perform construction, demolition, reconstruction, excavation, rehabilitation, repairs, renovations, alterations, or improvements for multiple employers pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. Currently, employees must work for 26 consecutive weeks to be eligible for benefits paid family leave benefits and they must re-qualify if they return to work with a different employer after an agreed and specified unpaid leave of absence. They must also requalify if they are temporarily laid off.

 

S50 amends the law to allow construction workers to remain eligible when: (1) they return to work with the same or different covered employer after an agreed and specified unpaid leave of absence; or (2) they return to work with the same or different covered employer after a lay-off, provided they had worked at least 26 of the last 39 weeks. The purpose of the law is to address the fact that the construction industry frequently requires union workers to work for multiple employers for short periods of time or to be laid off briefly between jobs, thereby making them ineligible for paid family leave benefits.

 

Disparate Impact Liability Recognized

 

Effective December 19, 2025, S8338 recognizes disparate impact liability as a method of establishing unlawful discrimination under the state’s Human Rights Law. Plaintiffs can now bring a case arguing that a challenged practice had or predictably would have a disparate impact on a protected class under the Human Rights Law even if the practice was not motivated by discriminatory intent. A defense exists where the challenged practice: (1) job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity; and (2) the business necessity could not be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.

 

Trapped at Work Act

 

Effective December 19, 2025, S4070B prohibits employers from using reimbursement clauses or promissory notes as a condition of employment. This includes repayment agreements for an employee who leaves their employment before a certain date, as well as reimbursement agreements for employer-provided training. There are several specific agreements which are exempt from this prohibition:

 

  • An agreement that requires the repayment of an advance;
  • An agreement that requires the worker to pay for any property that was sold or leased to them by the employer;
  • An agreement that requires educational personnel to comply with the terms and conditions of sabbatical leaves; or
  • An agreement subject to a collective bargaining.

 

Violations of this law can result in a fine of between $1,000 and $5,000 for each violation.

 

Employers should note there is a pending amendment (A9452) which would further narrow the types agreements affected and provide additional clarity if it is enacted.

 

Guidance on Healthy Terminals Act Amendment

 

Amendments to the Healthy Terminals Act (Act) went into effect on January 1, 2026. Due to some confusion created by the amendments, the New York State Department of Labor issued implementation guidance and FAQs to address the most common questions.

 

  • Covered Employees and Airport Locations. The law applies to anyone who works at least 50% of their time during any work week at a covered airport location. A covered airport location includes LaGuardia and JFK International airports and locations from where food to be consumed on airplanes departing from the above airports is prepared or delivered. Employees of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and employees of any other governmental agency are not covered by the Act. In addition, workers employed in an executive, administrative, or professional capacity as defined by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act are not covered by the Act.
  • Applicable Minimum Wage Rate, Benefit Rate, and Paid Leave. The applicable rates are: (1) the minimum wage rate established by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey; (2) the health and welfare supplemental wage as designated by the NYS Commissioner of Labor; and (3) paid leave as designated by the NYS Commissioner of Labor.
  • Posting Requirement. Employers must post the required posters as provided by NYSDOL in a conspicuous place at worksites where workers will see it.

 

Employers should note the guidance and FAQs are not formal rulemaking and are suggested recommendations for compliance.

 

Ban on Credit History Checks in Employment

 

Effective April 18, 2026, S3072 prohibits the use of consumer credit history checks in hiring, employment, and licensing determinations. Consumer credit history is defined as an individual’s credit worthiness, credit standing, credit capacity or payment history as indicated by a consumer credit report, credit score, or information obtained about an individual’s credit accounts, late or missed payments, charged-off debts, collections history, credit limit inquiries, bankruptcies, judgments, or liens. There are limited exceptions for employers who are required to perform such checks if required by state or federal, for positions subject to a security clearance, positions that are non-clerical where the individual has regular access to trade secrets or intelligence information (including national security information), those have a fiduciary responsibility or signatory authority over funds or agreements valued at $10,000 or more, or those whose duties allow them to modify digital security systems intended to prevent unauthorized use of the employer’s or client’s networks or databases.

 

Action Items

  1. Update paid family leave policy, if applicable.
  2. Discuss claims regarding disparate impact liability with legal counsel.
  3. Review employment agreements containing reimbursement clauses or promissory notes with legal counsel.
  4. Review and update wages, benefits, holidays, and vacation requirements for airport workers, if applicable.
  5. Review and update employment applications and background check procedures to comply with new prohibitions.
  6. Have appropriate personnel trained on the updated requirements.

 

 

New York, NY: Minimum Wage Standards for Security Guards

New York City has enacted the Aland Etienne Safety and Security Act, establishing citywide minimum wage, paid time off, and fringe-benefit standards for private sector security guards. The law applies to any private employer with at least one registered security guard working in NYC, with certain exclusions for federal, state, and Port Authority employers. Beginning January 1, 2027, covered employers must pay hourly wages that match or exceed those required on certain NYC public building service contracts. On January 1, 2028, covered employers must also provide paid holidays, vacations, and sick leave, and on January 1, 2029, they must offer supplemental benefits like health insurance or retirement contributions that are equivalent to those required on the same public contracts.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Ohio

Discussion

Ohio: E-Verify Requirements for Nonresidential Construction Employers

While E-Verify is voluntary for most private employers, effective March 19, 2026, HB 246 will require Ohio nonresidential construction employers to use the system for new hires. Failure to do so may result in notification of non-compliance, penalties ranging from $250 to $25,000, and potential restrictions on bidding for or participating in future state contracts for two years.  “Nonresidential construction” is defined as the building, renovation or improvement for any building, highway, bridge, utility or similar infrastructure in the state. This law does not apply to residential construction employers, manufactured or industrial builds, mobile homes or agricultural construction.  Nonresidential construction that occurs outside of Ohio is also exempt from this requirement.


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Oregon

Oregon: Paid Leave Oregon Job Protection Updates

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in OR

EFFECTIVE

JAN 1, 2026

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • In accordance with the 2025 amendments to Paid Leave Oregon (PLO), the Oregon Employment Department (OED) issued revised regulations regarding the PLO program’s job protection benefits.
  • Job protection is required for employees on PLO leave who have been employed for at least 90 consecutive calendar days.
  • Upon return from PLO leave, employees must be returned to their former position with the same rate of pay, benefits, location, job duties, working hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.

Discussion

Effective January 1, 2026, in accordance with 2025 amendments to Paid Leave Oregon (PLO), the Oregon Employment Department (OED) issued revised regulations regarding the PLO program’s job protection benefits. The Bureau of Labor and Industry (BOLI) is now responsible for enforcing the job protection, antidiscrimination, and antiretaliation provisions of the law.

 

Job protection is required for employees on PLO leave who have been employed for at least 90 consecutive calendar days. Upon return from leave, employees must be returned to their former position with the same rate of pay, benefits, location, job duties, working hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. This includes situations where a worker was hired or reassigned to temporarily work the same position as the employee on leave.

 

Employees are not entitled to return to their former position if the employee would have been terminated or reassigned if leave had not been taken. Job protection also does not apply where an employee provides clear notice of their intent not to return to work. If a position is eliminated, large employers with 25 or more employees must provide an available, equivalent position within a 50-mile radius of the former job site. Employers with less than 25 employees can use their discretion to restore the employee to a similar position based on business necessity. The job protection and reinstatement requirements are quite expansive, so employers should consult with legal counsel if they are not able to comply upon an employee’s return from leave.

 

Action Items

  1. Review and update leave of absence policies.
  2. Consult with legal counsel regarding specific job restorations situations.
  3. Have appropriate personnel trained on employee leave administration requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Pennsylvania

Discussion

Chester County, PA: New Human Relations Ordinance

Effective December 23, 2025, Chester County, Pennsylvania Ordinance 2025-03 implemented anti-discrimination protections applicable to employers with four or more employees. The Ordinance prohibits discrimination against any employee or independent contractor based on any protected class, including limiting inquiries about protected characteristics in the application and employment contexts. “Protected class” refers to an individual’s “actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin or citizenship status, ancestry, sex (including pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions), gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, familial status, physical or mental disability, source of income, age, veteran status, use of guide or support animals and/or mechanical aids, or domestic or sexual violence victim status.”

 

The Ordinance also prohibits employers from asking on an employment application or until after an initial interview whether the applicant has ever been convicted of a crime, unless otherwise required by law. An employer may include in its job requirements that an applicant have a clean driving record or be able to pass a child abuse clearance check. Background screenings also may not take place until after an initial interview and must be narrowly tailored to the job sought and what is otherwise required by law. An employer also cannot ask a job applicant what their salary is or was from any current or previous employment. Finally, a Human Relations Commission was established to receive and investigate employment complaints. In light of this major legal overhaul in Chester County, employers should review and update their policies and procedures for compliance.


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Texas

Texas: Attorney General Issues Opinion Letter on DEI Practices

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in TX

EFFECTIVE

JAN 19, 2026

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Texas’ Attorney General issued an Opinion Letter signaling a sweeping scrutiny of DEI practices, specifically warning that any use of race, sex, or other protected traits in employment decisions may be unlawful.
  • While not legally binding, the Opinion Letter makes a strong statement of enforcement, and may influence investigative and litigation strategies across Texas.

Discussion

Texas Attorney General (AG) Ken Paxton has issued a sweeping 74-page Opinion Letter challenging state-level Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Specifically, the Opinion Letter asserts that many common DEI policies and practices are unconstitutional and may violate federal and state anti-discrimination laws when implemented by public entities or private employers.

 

Of particular importance to employers, the Opinion Letter criticizes DEI initiatives incorporating race, sex, ethnicity, or similar characteristics into hiring, advancement, compensation, contracting, or training decisions, opining that these actions may function as “unlawful preferences.” In the AG’s view, these programs not only mirror affirmative action frameworks struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2023 but also create legal exposure under federal statutes like Title VII, Section 1981, and the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA).

 

The Opinion Letter specifically warns private employers that hiring goals, demographic benchmarks, or requirements for diverse candidate pools or interview panels may constitute unlawful reliance on protected traits. The AG goes on to scrutinize compensation systems and performance goals, noting that tying bonuses or executive evaluations to DEI metrics may constitute unlawful decision-making if demographic outcomes influence pay or advancement. The AG also identifies identity-based Employee Resource Groups (ERGs), mentorship programs, and leadership pipelines as “high-risk” structures if participation or access is limited by a protected trait. Beyond internal employment decisions, the Opinion Letter also calls out supplier diversity programs, indicating these practices may violate Section 1981 if vendor preferences are tied to race or sex.

 

Although the Opinion Letter is not legally binding on courts, it constitutes a strong statement of enforcement priority by the AG and is expected to influence investigative and litigation strategies across the state of Texas. Overall, the Opinion Letter suggests that DEI-driven frameworks across hiring, compensation, training, and contracting could invite heightened scrutiny. Employers are encouraged to discuss their DEI-based initiatives with legal counsel.

Action Items

  1. Consult with legal counsel regarding specific DEI initiatives.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on employer policies and consistent enforcement.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Washington

Discussion

Washington: ESD Publishes New PFML Template Notices

As of January 1, 2026, HB 1213 expanded worker protections under Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave program and introduced new administrative requirements for employers. Among these changes, HB 1213 added new employer notice obligations, and the Washington Employment Security Department (ESD) has now published template notices that employers may use to satisfy these requirements. First, if an employee’s leave exceeds two full workweeks of continuous leave (or 14 days of combined intermittent leave), employers must provide at least five business days’ written notice of (1) the employee’s first scheduled workday back, and (2) the estimated expiration of the employee’s job-restoration period. The ESD has published a template Job Protection Rights notice that employers may use to meet these requirements. Second, employers subject to federal FMLA terms are now allowed, but not required, to apply employee time taken under FMLA towards current and future periods of allotted leave under the state’s PFML program.  In order to do this, employers will need to provide employees requesting leave with written notice (1) within five business days of the employee’s request for leave, and (2) on a monthly basis thereafter. The ESD has similarly published a template FMLA Impact on Paid Leave Job Protection notice that employers can use to meet these requirements. Employers should note that these template notices may need to be tailored to meet the employe’s specific circumstances.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase