Posts

Seventh Circuit: ADEA Disparate Impact Protections Do Not Apply to Job Applicants

APPLIES TO

All Employers with IL, IN, and WI Employees

EFFECTIVE

January 23, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Kleber v. CareFusion Corporation, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal stated that the disparate impact protections under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) do not apply to job applicants who are not current employees. Specifically, Section 4(a)(2) of the ADEA specifically states that it applies to “employees.” There, a job posting indicated a position available for an individual with “3 to 7 years (no more than 7 years)” of experience. A 58-year old applicant did not get an interview, and sued for disparate impact under the ADEA because the stated experience requirement necessarily excluded him due to his age.

Read more

Seventh Circuit: ADEA Applies to Employees and Job Applicants

APPLIES TO

All Employers with IL, IN, and WI Employees

EFFECTIVE

April 26, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In a split from an Eleventh Circuit ruling last year, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently stated that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”) provides protections not only to current employees aged 40 or older, but to similarly situated job applicants as well.

November Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This HR Alert addresses the following topics:
  1. Ninth Circuit: USERRA Does Not Prohibit Mandatory Arbitration
  2. Eleventh Circuit: Applicants Cannot Sue for Disparate Impact Under Specific ADEA Statute
  3. California: Cal/OSHA to Develop Indoor Heat Illness Standard
  4. California: Monetary Value of Accrued Vacation not Needed on Wage Statements
  5. California: (More) Amendments to the Fair Pay Act – Prior Salary Not Valid Justification

Read more