California: Are Recent Legislative Updates Really that Shocking?

APPLIES TO

As Indicated

EFFECTIVE

As Indicated

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • PERB will take action for employee rights when the NLRB does not.
  • Leaves for crime victims and attending judicial proceedings are consolidated under the Civil Rights Division.
  • Paid sick leave is formally amended to allow usage for jury duty, attend judicial proceedings, and address crime victim needs.
  • Public works employers have 10 days to produce payroll records upon request, otherwise the DLSE may withhold penalties from the contract award.
  • Stay-or-pay agreements are a prohibited restraint of trade, subject to limited exception.
  • There will be statutorily mandated interagency cooperation for processing agricultural employee claims.
  • The requirement to rehire displaced workers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic has been extended another year through the end of 2026.
  • There are changes to public works annualization of per diem wages to ensure proper calculation.
  • The state Attorney General may bring a lawsuit against a contractor or deny a license application or renewal where the contractor has failed to properly pay its workers.
  • The Division of Workers’ Compensation is required to develop templates for a medical evaluation request form and a qualified medical evaluator (QME) report form.
  • Rideshare drivers will have the ability to organize while still being classified as independent contractors.
  • Workers’ compensation parties must disclose a financial interest in an entity providing services.
  • Manicurists and commercial fishers will continue to be exempt from using the “ABC” test to determine independent contractor status through 2029 and 2031, respectively.
  • Large developers of artificial intelligence models must have whistleblower processes for their employees.
  • Where an employer fails to pay a final judgment for unpaid wages within 180 days of the final judgment, they are subject to a civil penalty of up to three times the judgment amount plus attorneys’ fees and costs.
  • By February 1, 2026, all employers must provide employees with a stand-alone written notice of rights. Employers must provide current employees the opportunity to name an emergency contact no later than March 30, 2026.
  • Where an employee’s assessment, testing, admission, or acknowledgment of their own personal bias is made in good faith and solicited or required as part of a bias mitigation training does not constitute unlawful discrimination.
  • Employers must retain collected demographic information separate from personnel files. Pay data reporting will change as of January 1, 2027 to include 13 more data points.
  • There are clarifications on how the CRD manages received complaints under FEHA, including tolling deadlines.
  • An employee’s right to review their personnel file related to their performance includes education and training records, which must identify specific information.
  • Paid family leave benefits will be expanded to include caring for a designated person with a serious health condition.
  • Contractor joint liability requirements and exceptions are clarified.
  • A CalWARN notice of mass layoff, relocation, or termination must include new information.
  • The pay transparency law amends the definition of “pay scale” to mean a good faith estimate of the salary or hourly wage range that the employer reasonably expects to pay for the position upon hire.
  • The statute of limitations for violations of the equal pay law is extended to three years, regardless of whether a violation is considered willful. Other changes extend and clarify requirements.
  • The Construction Trucking Employer Amnesty Program offers a settlement option to eliminate employer liability.
  • Expense reimbursement requirements are identified for commercial drivers.
  • The Division of Workers’ Compensation may obtain a lien on an uninsured employer’s real property transferred to hide the asset.

Discussion

California’s legislative session has come to a close with the Governor signing a number of bills impacting employers and employees. As in previous years, the California Legislature has been active this season. Here is a summary of key updates employers should be aware of.

 

AB 288 | JAN 1, 2026 – PERB is California’s version of the NLRB. The Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), already existing to protect public employees, is expanded to protect all employees that otherwise would be protected by the terms of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), but are, by act or omission of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), not in fact protected. The bill seeks to ensure that all California workers maintain the freedom to engage in collective action, to organize, form, join, or assist labor organizations, and engage in collective bargaining. PERB will have similar authority to address collective bargaining and employee claims as exists for the NLRB.

 

There will be a phase in period for adjudicating unfair labor practice cases: the bill is effective January 1, 2026 for employers with 500 or more employees for refusal to bargain or acknowledge election certification or unilateral withdrawal of recognition of an employee representative by an employer of any size (Category 1 cases); July 1, 2026 for claims that an employer of any size refused to bargain, recognize, or give effect to an election certification (Category 1); January 1, 2027 for claims that an employer failed to bargain in good faith where engaged for bargaining for over six months without agreement (Category 2); January 1, 2027 for all other cases, which are organized within this category from priority 1 to 4 (Category 3). Priority of cases is designated in order of Category. Unfair practice violations may result in $1,000 civil penalties per worker per violation.

 

AB 406 | OCT 1, 2025 – Reinstates Protections Against Qualifying Acts of Violence for Violations Prior to December 31, 2024; Moves Leave to Attend Judicial Proceedings to the Government Code; Expands Paid Sick Leave. As of January 1, 2025, protections including leave for victims of qualifying acts of violence was moved from the Labor Code to the Government Code to provide the Civil Rights Division (CRD) authority over alleged violations. This bill reinstates the provisions existing under the Labor Code on or before December 31, 2024 to apply only to alleged actions or inactions occurring on or before that date. The previous protections are reinstated until 2035.

 

The bill also transfers enforcement authority for discrimination prohibitions relating to crime victims, including when the victims are employees’ family members, taking leave to attend judicial proceedings from the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) to the Civil Rights Department as of January 1, 2026, by transferring laws from the Labor Code to the Government Code. The current Labor Code sections will apply to violations occurring on or before December 31, 2025, and those laws will sunset as of 2035.

 

Finally, the paid sick leave law has been amended to specifically allow for leave to be taken (1) to attend judicial proceedings relating to crime victims as was stated in the Labor Code prior to 2025; (2) for purposes of jury duty, appearing as a witness in a judicial proceeding, and to obtain certain crime victim relief as of January 1, 2025; and (3) for crime victims to attend judicial proceedings as of January 1, 2026. These changes reflect reconciliation of provisions among the moving parts of these laws to be consistent across code sections and expand on what already existed.

 

AB 538 | JAN 1, 2026 – Public works access to payroll records. Contractors and subcontractors must currently maintain payroll records for employees on public works projects. When the request for records is made through the project-awarding public agency, and the agency does not have a certified copy of the records, this bill requires the agency to obtain the payroll records from the contractor. Once the contractor receives the request from the awarding agency, the contractor has 10 days to comply. If the contractor fails to comply, the DLSE is notified and may seek to withhold penalties from the contract award.

 

AB 692 | JAN 1, 2026 – “Stay-or-Pay” Agreements are a Restraint of Trade. This bill prohibits employers from entering into agreements that require payment of debts, debt collection or ending forbearance, or imposes any penalty, fee, or cost on a worker if their work relationship terminates. Provided that certain requirements are met, this restriction does not apply to tuition repayment costs for a transferable credential, enrollment in an approved apprenticeship program, or repayment of a hiring bonus that is not tied to specific job performance. These prohibitions apply to contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2026. Victims or worker representatives may bring civil lawsuits for violations of the law, which may result in a minimum of a $5,000 penalty per worker, plus injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. The Governor encouraged further legislation in 2026 to preclude “stay-or-pay” agreements in collective bargaining.

 

AB 845 | [Upon Legislative Appropriation] – Agricultural Employee Claims. This bill requires any agency within the Labor and Workforce Development Agency to route complaints received from agricultural employees to the proper state agencies with jurisdiction over the complaints, and prohibits the transmitting entity from disclosing the identity and personal information of the complainant to the extent prohibited by law without their consent.

 

AB 858 | JAN 1, 2026 – Extension for Rehiring Displaced Workers. This bill extends Labor Code § 2810.8 through January 1, 2027. Previously expiring at the end of 2025, former employers in the hospitality and business service provider industries must offer re-employment to those who were laid off for qualifying reasons during the COVID-19 pandemic when positions are available for which they qualify, in addition to other notice and recordkeeping requirements.

 

AB 889 | JAN 1, 2026 – Changes to Public Works Annualization of Per Diem Wages. Employers use annualization to calculate fringe benefit credits that may be applied to prevailing rate wages on public work projects. This bill removes existing exceptions for employers to pay the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for public works projects and revokes annualization exemptions authorized before January 1, 2026. Employers are authorized to take full credit for the hourly amounts contributed to defined contribution pension plans that provide for both immediate participation and essentially immediate vesting even if the employer contributes at a lower rate or does not make contributions to private construction. The employer has the burden to prove that the credit for employer payments was calculated properly. Employers are required to produce records of employee hours and employer payments on private construction sufficient for the Labor Commissioner to verify that the credit for employer payments was properly calculated on an annualized basis; the Labor Commissioner may deny the employer credit for employment payments if the employer does not produce the requested records.

 

AB 1002 | JAN 1, 2026 – Contractor Penalties for Wage and Hour Violations. The state Attorney General may bring a lawsuit against a contractor or deny a license application or renewal where the contractor has failed to pay its workers the full amount of wages that the workers are entitled to under state law, has not fulfilled a wage judgment, or is in violation of an injunction or court order regarding the payment of wages to its workers. A good faith mistake regarding which wage rate applies to a particular category of work will not be considered a violation of the law.

 

AB 1293 | JAN 1, 2026 – Workers’ Compensation Qualified Medical Evaluators Report Form Template. This bill requires the Division of Workers’ Compensation to develop templates for a medical evaluation request form and a qualified medical evaluator (QME) report form. The Division is required to adopt regulations to implement this bill by January 1, 2027.

 

AB 1340 | JAN 1, 2026 – Transportation Network Company Drivers Labor Relations Act. This bill requires that transportation network company (TNC) drivers, providing prearranged passenger transportation services, have the right to form, join, and participate in the activities of TNC driver organizations, to bargain through representatives of their own choosing, to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of bargaining or other mutual aid or protection, and to refrain from such activities. This essentially gives rideshare drivers the ability to organize while still being classified as independent contractors. The PERB is required to enforce these rules.

 

AB 1398 | JAN 1, 2026 – Workers’ Compensation Disclosure Requirements. All interested parties in a workers’ compensation case must disclose to a third-party payer, or other entity to whom a claim for payment is presented for services furnished pursuant to a referral, a financial interest in an entity providing services. The disclosure must be made in writing, at the time the claim for payment is presented for services furnished pursuant to a referral.

 

AB 1514 | JAN 1, 2026 – Extended Independent Contractor “ABC” Exemption for Licensed Manicurists and Commercial Fishers. Under Labor Code § 2778, manicurists and commercial fishers are exempt from using the “ABC” test to determine independent contractor status. Those exemptions were set to sunset and now have been extended until 2029 and 2031, respectively.

 

SB 53 | JAN 1, 2026 – Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (TFAIA). Large developers of artificial intelligence models are required to follow specified standards when creating frontier models and to publish information about their models on their websites. For employers, it creates whistleblower protections for those working with foundation models and prohibits a frontier developer from preventing, or retaliating against, a covered employee from or for disclosing information to the Attorney General, a federal authority, the employee’s superior, or an employee who has authority to investigate, discover, or correct the reported issue, if the covered employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses that the frontier developer’s activities pose a specific and substantial danger to the public health or safety resulting from a catastrophic risk or that the frontier developer has violated the TFAIA. It also requires frontier developers to have specified internal reporting procedures for this purpose. This bill preempts any similar local laws enacted on or after January 1, 2025.

 

SB 261 | JAN 1, 2026 – DLSE Enforcement of and Penalties for Wage Theft. Where an employer fails to pay a final judgment for unpaid wages within 180 days of the final judgment, they are subject to a civil penalty of up to three times the judgment amount. Penalties are distributed 50/50 between employees and the DLSE. The Labor Commissioner or public prosecutor must be awarded court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees for successful judgment enforcement.

 

SB 294 | FEB 1, 2026 – Workplace Know Your Rights Act. By February 1, 2026, all employers must provide employees with a stand-alone written notice of rights to each current employee through personal service, email, or text message, or other method if it can reasonably be expected to be received by the employee within one business day of sending. The written notice must also be provided to each new employee upon hire and annually to existing employees. The Labor Commissioner is expected to provide a template notice by January 1, 2026. The notice must describe employee rights to workers’ compensation benefits, notice of inspection by immigration agencies, organize a union or engage in concerted activity, and when interacting with law enforcement at the workplace, as well as other information deemed necessary by the Labor Commissioner. Employers must keep records of compliance for three years, including the date that each written notice is provided or sent.

 

If an employee has notified their employer that they would like their designated emergency contact to be notified in the event they are arrested or detained, the employer must notify the designated emergency contact if the employee is arrested or detained on their worksite or if the employer is otherwise aware of arrest or detention away from the worksite during work hours. Employers must provide current employees the opportunity to name an emergency contact no later than March 30, 2026, and at the time of hire for new employees hired after March 30, 2026. The employer must also allow employees to provide updated emergency contact information through their duration of employment.

 

SB 303 | JAN 1, 2026 – Admissions During Bias Mitigation Training Do Not Trigger FEHA Protections. Where an employee’s assessment, testing, admission, or acknowledgment of their own personal bias is made in good faith and solicited or required as part of a bias mitigation training does not constitute unlawful discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). This measure is enacted in part to encourage employers to conduct bias mitigation training.

 

SB 447 | JAN 1, 2026 – Workers’ Compensation Firefighter and Peace Officer Death Benefits Extended. When a local firefighter or peace officer dies as a result of an accident or injury caused by external violence or physical force while performing their duty, workers’ compensation rules require the employer to continue providing health benefits to the deceased employee’s minor dependents under the benefits extended to the surviving spouse, or if there is no surviving spouse, until the minor dependent reaches a certain age. This bill extends that age from 21 to 26 years old.

 

SB 464 | JAN 1, 2026 – Pay Data Reporting Update. Employers with 100 or more employees have been required to provide pay data reporting to the State. This bill amends those requirements. First, this bill requires employers to retain collected demographic information separate from personnel files. Second, it makes civil penalties mandatory, rather than optional, for failure to report, which are $100 per employee for a first violation and $200 per employee for subsequent violations. Finally, pay data reporting will change as of January 1, 2027 to include 13 more data points, for a total of 23 data points reported. Employers will need to start collecting the required data in 2026 to prepare for reporting in 2027.

 

SB 477 | JAN 1, 2026 – CRD Procedural Updates Under FEHA. There is a set process for how the CRD manages received complaints under FEHA. This bill makes some clarifications and expands the reasons for tolling certain timed procedures. The bill clarifies the definition of “group or class complaint” to mean any complaint alleging a pattern or practice. Where a group or class complaint would otherwise cover another complaint made, the department will issue a right-to-sue notice for that complaint on request or at the conclusion of the group or class complaint. Additionally, the time for a complainant to file a civil action under certain identified statutes is tolled until one year after the department issues either a written notice that it has closed its investigation without electing to file a civil action for the alleged violation, or written notice that the complaint has remained closed following an appeal to the department if a timely appeal is made to the original closure. The time for the CRD to bring certain claims against an employer or issue right-to-sue letters may be tolled during a dispute resolution proceeding (e.g., mediation), based on mutual written agreement by the parties, during the time the CRD’s investigation is extended due to a pending petition to compel, or during a timely appeal for closing the complaint.

 

SB 487 | JAN 1, 2026 – Workers’ Compensation Benefits and Obligations for Firefighters and Peace Officers. This bill says that an employer is entitled to receive no more than 1/3 of the third-party defendant’s liability insurance policy limit for an injured peace office or firefighter, if the employee establishes that their total damages exceed the net recovery after satisfaction of the employer’s claim and that the total liability insurance limits available are insufficient to fully compensate the employer and employee’s proven damages. The bill limits an employer’s right to reimbursement, subrogation, or lien to the maximum recovery threshold. Employers are prohibited from asserting any recovery by an injured employee as a credit or offset against future workers’ compensation benefits and must have a settlement or release to limit the employer’s claim for reimbursement to the portion of the settlement not allocated to the employee under this bill.

 

SB 513 | JAN 1, 2026 – Personnel Records Clarified. An employee’s right to review their personnel file related to their performance includes education and training records. Education and training records must include the name of the employee, the name of the training provider, the duration and date of the training, the core competencies of the training (including skills in equipment or software), and the resulting certification or qualification.

 

SB 590 | JUL 1, 2028 – Paid Family Leave to Care for Designated Persons. Paid family leave benefits will be expanded to include caring for a designated person with a serious health condition. “Designated person” means any care recipient related by blood or whose association with the individual is the equivalent of a family relationship. This is consistent with the definition of designated person under the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), which differs from the definition under the state paid sick leave law. Upon request to the EDD for wage replacement benefits for leave to care for a designated person, the employee must identify the designated person, and attest under penalty of perjury how that person is related by blood or is the equivalent of a family relationship.

 

SB 597 | JAN 1, 2026 – Contractor Joint Liability Clarified. Contractors are currently liable for wages of subcontractor employees. This bill limits the direct contractor’s liability to payments for labor required by the subcontractor’s agreement with the laborer or the subcontractor’s collective bargaining agreement. Additionally, liability of direct contractors will not be based on the employer’s misclassification of the craft of a worker. The statutory remedies are deemed to be cumulative of any other available remedies. Further, a direct contractor is not otherwise liable for fringe or other benefit contributions if it pays outstanding fringe and other benefit contributions owed to the worker through a joint check made payable to the subcontractor and the labor trust fund. The definition of “direct contractor” was revised to mean a contractor that has a direct contractual relationship with an owner or any other person or entity engaging contractors or subcontractors for the erection, construction, alteration, or repair of a building, structure, or other private work on behalf of the owner.

 

SB 617 | JAN 1, 2026 – CalWARN Notice Revision. A CalWARN notice of mass layoff, relocation, or termination must include (1) whether the employer plans to coordinate services, such as a rapid response orientation, through the local workforce development board, the employer plans to coordinate services through a different entity, or the employer does not plan to coordinate services with any entity; (2) the email and phone number of the local workforce development board and a scripted description of the board; (3) a description of the statewide food assistance program known as CalFresh, the CalFresh benefits helpline, and a link to the CalFresh internet website; and (4) a functioning email and telephone number of the employer for contact. When coordinating services with a local workforce development board, an employer must do so within 30 days from the date of the notice.

 

SB 642 | JAN 1, 2026 – Pay Transparency and Equal Pay Updates. Currently, employers must disclose the pay scale of a position in job postings and upon request. This bill revises “pay scale” to mean a good faith estimate of the salary or hourly wage range that the employer reasonably expects to pay for the position upon hire. Additionally, the statute of limitations for violations of the equal pay law is extended to three years, regardless of whether a violation is considered willful. There is also a six-year lookback period for obtaining remedies. The bill states that a cause of action under the equal pay law arises when an alleged unlawful compensation decision or practice is adopted, an individual becomes subjected to an unlawful compensation decision or practice, or an individual is affected by application of an unlawful compensation decision or practice, including each time wages, benefits, or other compensation is paid. For purposes of equal pay, “sex” has the same definition as is used under FEHA and equal pay must be provided as compared to those of “another” sex rather than the current standard of the “opposite” sex; and “wages” and “wage rates” include all forms of pay, including, but not limited to, salary, overtime pay, bonuses, stock, stock options, profit sharing and bonus plans, life insurance, vacation and holiday pay, cleaning or gasoline allowances, hotel accommodations, reimbursement for travel expenses, and benefits.

 

SB 809 | JAN 1, 2026 – Misclassification of Construction Drivers; Vehicle Expenses. Currently, the Motor Carrier Employer Amnesty Program allows a motor carrier performing drayage services to be relieved of liability for statutory or civil penalties associated with the misclassification of commercial drivers as independent contractors if the motor carrier enters into a settlement agreement with the commissioner. This bill creates a similar program, known as the Construction Trucking Employer Amnesty Program, allowing an eligible construction contractor to be relieved of liability for certain statutory or civil penalties associated with the misclassification of construction drivers as independent contractors, if the eligible construction contractor executes a settlement agreement negotiated with, or approved by, the Labor Commissioner prior to January 1, 2029. Additionally, the Labor Code will state that mere ownership of a vehicle used by a person in providing labor or services for remuneration does not determine whether that person is an independent contractor; the statutory “ABC” test determines independent contractor status.

 

Currently, employees are required to be reimbursed for necessary expenditures incurred in the discharge of their duties. This bill expressly requires reimbursement for expenses related to use of a personal or commercial vehicle while performing their job duties. With respect to construction trucking, a commercial motor vehicle driver who owns the truck, tractor, trailer, or other commercial vehicle that they use in performing their job duties is entitled to reimbursement for the use, upkeep, and depreciation of that vehicle, regardless of whether the vehicle is owned by the driver as an individual or through a corporate entity. This addition to the Labor Code is “declarative of existing law.” The amount to be reimbursed for the use of the truck, tractor, or trailer must be negotiated either by the driver (or their representative) and the employer. The amount negotiated must be either a flat rate reimbursement or a per-mile reimbursement, but must at least be the actual amount expended by the driver for a flat rate reimbursement or the standard mileage reimbursement rate set by the IRS. This expense reimbursement may be paid directly to the driver in the driver’s name or to a corporate entity owned and controlled by the driver if the vehicle is owned by the corporate entity.

 

SB 847| JAN 1, 2026 – Workers’ Compensation Lien on Real Property. This bill allows the Division of Workers’ Compensation to obtain a lien on an uninsured employer’s real property transferred after an employee’s injury, where the transfer indicates that it was made as a gift with no transfer tax paid or was intended to hide the asset.

 

Action Items

  1. Have appropriate personnel trained on compliance with the National Labor Relations Act.
  2. Update leave policies for compliance.
  3. Have legal counsel review and update employee contracts in 2026.
  4. Maintain processes to rehire displaced workers as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  5. Review public works annualization of per diem wages to ensure proper calculation.
  6. Conduct a wage and hour audit to confirm appropriate pay is provided to employees.
  7. Have legal counsel review independent contractor classifications for compliance.
  8. By February 1, 2026, provide employees with a stand-alone written notice of rights.
  9. By March 30, 20206, provide current employees the opportunity to name an emergency contact.
  10. Retain collected demographic information separate from personnel files.
  11. Prepare to expand pay data collection in 2026.
  12. Ensure education and training records identify required information.
  13. Update CalWARN notices with newly required information for 2026.
  14. Evaluate pay scale measurements for disclosure in compliance with pay transparency requirements.
  15. Have an equal pay audit conducted to evaluate compliance.
  16. Update expense reimbursement procedures for personal and commercial drivers.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase

Colorado: Workers’ Compensation Changes to Employee Selection of Treating Physician

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in CO

EFFECTIVE

January 1, 2028

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Injured employees will be able to select their treating physician.
  • Employers must provide written notice to employees of their right to designate a physician.

Discussion

HB 1300 will give employees broader ability to select their primary treating physician for purposes of receiving health care in connection with a workers’ compensation claim. Within seven days of receiving notice of an on-the-job injury, employers must give written notice to the employee of their right to designate a treating physician, including where to access the Division of Workers’ Compensation’s list of Level I and Level II accredited physicians. The Division will provide a template designation form on which employees are required to designate their preferred provider.

 

The designated physician must be within 70 miles of the employee’s work or home address, unless there are three or fewer physicians within 70 miles who are willing to treat the injured employee, in which case the designated physician must be within 100 miles, unless the employee can show good cause otherwise.

 

The employee may make one treating physician designation any time after injury, but before being placed at maximum medical improvement. If the employee declines to designate a physician within seven days after receipt of notice of their right to designate, an employer or insurer may designate the Level I or Level II listed physician on their behalf. However, the employee may still subsequently designate a physician. An employee can subsequently change their designated treating physician once within 120 days after the first physician designation, but before the employee reaches maximum medical improvement.

 

For injured employees who are not a resident of Colorado, an employer must designate a treating physician within 10 days after receiving notice of an on-the-job injury and notify the employee of the designation in writing. The treating physician may be within 100 miles of the employee’s home address. If the employer or insurer declines to timely designate, the employee may designate a treating physician within 100 miles of the employee’s home in writing to the employer or through attendance at an appointment with the employee’s designated physician.

 

In an emergency situation, an injured employee must be taken to any physician or health-care facility that is able to provide the necessary care. Once emergency care is no longer required, the treating physician selection procedures may be followed. Within seven days of receiving notice that emergency care is no longer required, an employer or insurer must provide written notice to the injured employee of their right to designate a treating physician.

 

Additionally, an employer or the employer’s insurer will be required to use the Division of Workers’ Compensation’s utilization standards when responding to a request for authorization from a treating physician. If they do not, the director of the Division may deem the physician’s services as authorized, reasonable, and necessary and require payment for the services by the employer or the employer’s insurer.

Action Items

  1. Review the bill here.
  2. Implement the notice of rights and physician designate form when provided by the Division.
  3. Update procedures to include timing requirements to send the notice.
  4. Have appropriate personnel trained on the requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase

Connecticut: Protections for Sexual Assault and Human Trafficking Victims

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in CT

EFFECTIVE

October 1, 2025

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Effective October 1, 2025, HB 7236 amended the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act to add the status of being a victim of sexual assault or human trafficking as a protected characteristic.

Discussion

Effective October 1, 2025, HB 7236 amended the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act to add the status of being a victim of sexual assault or human trafficking as a protected characteristic. In addition, it is an unlawful employment practice to deny a reasonable leave of absence to such persons in order to: (1) seek attention for injuries caused by sexual assault or trafficking; (2) obtain services including safety planning from a domestic violence agency or rape crisis center; (3) obtain psychological counseling; (4) take other actions to increase safety from future incidents of sexual assault or trafficking; or (5) obtain legal services, assist in the prosecution of the offense, or otherwise participate in legal proceedings in relation to the incident or incidents of sexual assault or trafficking.

 

Employees who avail themselves of leave shall provide their employer with certification, within a reasonable time frame. Such certification can be: (1) a police report; (2) a court order protecting or separating the employee from sexual assault or trafficking; (3) other evidence from the court or prosecuting attorney that the employee appeared in court; or (4) documentation from a medical professional including a counselor. If an employee has a physical or mental disability resulting from an incident of sexual assault or trafficking, the employee shall be treated in the same manner as an employee with any other disability.

 

Action Items

  1. Review and update discrimination, harassment, and disability policies.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on the requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase

Delaware: New Pay Transparency Requirements

APPLIES TO

Employers in DE with 26+ Employees

EFFECTIVE

September 26, 2027

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • New pay transparency requirements will require covered employers to include compensation information and benefits descriptions in both internal and external job postings.
  • The new law also imposes new recordkeeping requirements, and penalties for employer violations.

Discussion

On September 26, 2025, Delaware Governor Matt Meyer signed HB 105, adding Delaware to the growing list of states with pay transparency obligations for employers. The law is set to take effect on September 26, 2027, and will apply to employers with 26 or more employees.

 

Under HB 105, covered employers must include the hourly or salary compensation or compensation range and a general description of benefits and other compensation in any external or internal job postings. If no job opportunity has been made available to the applicant, employers must provide such information prior to an offer or discussion of compensation or at any time upon the applicant’s request.

 

The law applies to Delaware-based positions and certain remote roles offered by Delaware employers, with limited exceptions including interim or temporary jobs that need to be filled immediately and positions covered by a collective bargaining agreement that is executed, amended, modified, renewed or replaced before September 26, 2027.

 

In addition to the disclosure requirements, the new law imposes new recordkeeping requirements on employers. Specifically, employers must make, keep and preserve job descriptions and salary and wage rate history for each employee for at least three years.

 

Employers that fail to comply with the law may be subject to a written warning for a first offense and civil penalties of between $500 and $10,000 for each subsequent violation or for any act of retaliation against an individual for asserting their rights under the law.

 

Action Items

  1. Review job postings to prepare for upcoming compliance with new pay transparency requirements.
  2. Conduct a pay audit to identify and remedy any pay disparities.
  3. Have appropriate personnel trained on the new requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase

New York, NY: Legislative Update

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in New York City

EFFECTIVE

As Indicated

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • The New York City Council approved amendments to the Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA).
  • Effective September 22, 2025, the minimum per-mile rate for high-volume for-hire vehicle trips that begin in New York City and end outside of New York City has been increased by the Taxi and Limousine Commission.

Discussion

Earned Safe and Sick Time Act Amendments

 

The New York City Council approved amendments to the Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA). The most notable changes are summarized below.

 

Unpaid Leave Bank. Employers shall provide to employees upon hire and on the first day of each calendar year, a minimum of 32 hours of unpaid safe/sick time that is immediately available for use. An employer is not required to carry over to the following calendar year any unused unpaid safe/sick time.

 

Prenatal Leave. Employers shall provide employees 20 hours of paid prenatal leave during any 52-week calendar period.

 

New Covered Uses. In addition to the existing reasons for safe/sick time, employees can now take leave:

 

  • For a public disaster that prevents the employee from reporting to their work location;
  • At the direction of a public official to remain indoors or to avoid travel;
  • For caregiving for a minor child or care recipient;
  • To initiate, attend or prepare for a legal proceeding or hearing related to subsistence benefits or housing to which the employee, the employee’s family member, or the employee’s care recipient is a party, or to take actions necessary to apply for, maintain, or restore subsistence benefits or shelter for the employee or their family member or care recipient; and
  • Due to being a victim of having a family member who is a victim of workplace violence.

 

Temporary Schedule Change. Employees can still request a temporary schedule change, but employers is not required to agree to the requested change. Employers cannot retaliate against an employee for requesting a schedule change.

 

Although the amendment has been passed, the Mayor has not yet signed it. The amendments will become law 120 days after the Mayor signs.

 

Minimum Pay for Drivers Amended

 

Effective September 22, 2025, the minimum per-mile rate for high-volume for-hire vehicle trips that begin in New York City and end outside of New York City has been increased by the Taxi and Limousine Commission. Drivers must be paid $1.700 per mile for a trip dispatched to a vehicle that is not an accessible vehicle and no less than $2.122 per mile for a trip dispatched to an accessible vehicle.

 

Action Items

  1. Review and revise Earned Sick and Safe Time Policies, pending the Mayor’s signing of the bill.
  2. Revise applicable pay rates for high-volume for-hire drivers, as applicable.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase

Allegheny County, PA: Executive Order Attempts to Fill NLRB Gaps

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in Allegheny County, PA

EFFECTIVE

August 28, 2025

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Following in the footsteps of other states, the Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Executive signed the Strengthening Worker Protections in Alleghany County Executive Order in an effort to fill the gap in the event the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) or its key provisions are repealed, invalidated, or otherwise rendered unenforceable.
  • Other jurisdictions, like New York, that have enacted such laws have faced swift legal challenges from the federal government and Allegheny County’s Executive Order is also expected to be challenged.

Discussion

Following in the footsteps of other states, the Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Executive signed the Strengthening Worker Protections in Alleghany County Executive Order in an effort to fill the gap in the event the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) or its key provisions are repealed, invalidated, or otherwise rendered unenforceable. The Order directs the county manager to create a program to establish the Office of Worker Protections (OWP). The purpose of the OWP to investigate, protect, and enforce employee rights where there are violations of Allegheny County’s employee protection laws.

 

The primary duties of the OWP are to:

 

  • Conduct outreach and education efforts that effectively reach those workers most likely unaware of their rights, as well as small and medium-sized businesses that may be unaware of their legal obligations.
  • Develop proactive strategies to reach workers and industries where violations are likely high but workers face barriers to filing complaints.
  • Develop partnerships with community organizations that can reach the workers most likely to experience violations.
  • Create a consistent and rigorous investigatory process that uses all of the statutory enforcement tools at the County’s disposal.
  • Implement a system for handling complaints to ensure efficient processing and prioritization aligned with the office’s mission.

 

The Order also empowers the County Manager to establish an Allegheny County Labor Relations Board in the event of a federal rollback of the NLRA. To that end, the County Manager is directed to ensure that workers in the County “enjoy the fundamental right to organize, engage in collective bargaining, and participate in concerted activities for mutual aid and protection.”

 

Other jurisdictions, like New York, that have enacted such laws have faced swift legal challenges from the federal government and Allegheny County’s Executive Order is also expected to be challenged. The main issue is that it is likely preempted by the NLRA and that it conflicts with the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution which contends that federal law takes precedence when there is a conflicting state law. It remains to be seen whether the Executive Order will be enforceable.

 

Action Items

  1. Review applicable labor protections with legal counsel.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase

Washington: Isolated Worker Harassment Law Amended

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in WA

EFFECTIVE

January 1, 2026

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Effective January 1, 2026, HB 1524 amends Washington’s law addressing sexual harassment and sexual assault committed against isolated workers.
  • The law applies to the following covered employers: hotel, motel, retail, security guard entity, or property services contractor.
  • Covered employers must now also provide a panic button to each isolated employee and inform isolated employees on how to use panic buttons, and inform managers and supervisors on their responsibility to respond to the use of panic buttons.

Discussion

Effective January 1, 2026, HB 1524 amends Washington’s law addressing sexual harassment and sexual assault committed against isolated workers. The law applies to the following covered employers: hotel, motel, retail, security guard entity, or property services contractor. The amendment defines an isolated employee as an employee who performs work in an area where two or more coworkers, supervisors, or a combination thereof are unable to immediately respond to an emergency without being summoned by the employee or spends at least 50% of their working hours without a supervisor or another coworker present. In addition, this definition applies to those employed as a janitor, security guard, hotel or motel housekeeper, or room service attendant.

 

Covered employers must now also provide a panic button to each isolated employee and inform isolated employees on how to use panic buttons, and inform managers and supervisors on their responsibility to respond to the use of panic buttons. There is a recordkeeping requirement of the purchase and utilization of panic buttons provided to isolated employees. Covered employers must also keep a record of the mandatory training required by the amendment.

 

The panic button must:

 

  • Be designed to be carried by the isolated employee;
  • Be simple to activate without delays caused by entering passwords or waiting for the system to turn on;
  • Provide an effective signal for the circumstances when activated; and
  • Be able to summon immediate assistance and allow responders to accurately identify the isolated employee’s location.

 

Washington’s Department of Labor & Industries is tasked with investigating violations of the requirements. Financial penalties for violations can be $1,000 for the first willful violation and up to $10,000 for subsequent violations.

 

Action Items

  1. Evaluate workforce to determine whether workers meet the definition of isolated worker.
  2. Distribute panic buttons, if applicable.
  3. Have appropriate personnel trained on the requirements.
  4. Document purchase and utilization of panic buttons and required trainings.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase

Washington: Broad Interpretation of “Applicant” for Purposes of Pay Transparency Violations

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Applicants in WA

EFFECTIVE

September 4, 2025

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • On September 4, 2025, in Branson v. Washington Fine Wine & Spirits LLC, the Washington Supreme Court ruled any individual applying to a job posting that does not comply with the pay transparency requirements of Washington’s Equal Pay and Opportunities Act (EPOA) is entitled to seek damages under the law.
  • In reaching its ruling, the court relied on a dictionary definition of applicant as “one who applies for something.”

Discussion

On September 4, 2025, in Branson v. Washington Fine Wine & Spirits LLC, the Washington Supreme Court ruled any individual applying to a job posting that does not comply with the pay transparency requirements of Washington’s Equal Pay and Opportunities Act (EPOA) is entitled to seek damages under the law. This is regardless of whether the individual actually intended to seek employment with the employer. Here, the plaintiff applicants applied for retail positions with the defendant and the job postings did not contain the required pay scale information. One applicant interviewed for the position and discussed pay but did not accept the position offered. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a class action. The defendants argued that the statute only applied to “bona fide” applicants.

 

In reaching its ruling, the court relied on a dictionary definition of applicant as “one who applies for something.” The Court argued that if the legislature intended to limit who was an applicant, it would have done so. Originally, the law provided remedies to “individuals” before it was amended to applicants and employees. In addition, no further limiting words like “bona fide” were included. The court argued that if the legislature intended to limit who was entitled to remedies, it would need to amend the law to add the restriction.

 

Employers in Washington were already facing a surge of class action lawsuits alleging violations of the pay transparency requirements of the EPOA, and this ruling certainly does not limit who is eligible to file a claim. The dissent noted that this ruling gives “bounty seekers an incentive to trawl the internet for noncompliant job postings to obtain a statutory damages award unrelated to any personal harm.” Although the legislature did act over the summer to amend the EPOA to allow employers some added protections, like including a period of time to correct a deficient posting, it remains to be seen whether future amendments are on the table to restrict the definition of applicant.

 

Action Items

  1. Review and revise job postings for compliance with pay transparency requirements.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on the requirements.
  3. Consult with legal counsel on claims of pay transparency violations.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase

October Alerts

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

EEOC Increases Penalty for Violations of Notice-Posting Requirements

On September 30, 2025, the EEOC issued a final rule increasing the maximum civil penalty for failing to post required workplace notices about federal anti-discrimination laws to $698, up from $680. Covered entities, including private employers with 15 or more employees, state and local governments, and labor organizations, must display the “Know Your Rights” poster in a conspicuous location and are encouraged to post it digitally as well. Employers must ensure the poster is accessible to individuals with disabilities and reflects current legal protections under Title VII, ADA, GINA, and PWFA. The penalty adjustment is mandated annually under federal law and applies to violations assessed on or after the effective date.

 

EEOC Administratively Closes Disparate Impact Cases

The EEOC administratively closed essentially all pending charges based solely on unintentional discrimination claims (e.g., “disparate impact” cases) as of September 30, 2025, and will issue right-to-sue letters by October 31. This shift, driven by executive orders from President Trump, significantly limits the agency’s enforcement of policies that disproportionately affect certain protected groups. Employers should be aware that while disparate impact claims are being administratively closed by the EEOC, disparate impact liability remains a viable theory of discrimination under Title VII and claims for such will be allowed to proceed on their own in federal court. Moreover, many states impose laws establishing disparate impact liability under their state non-discrimination laws.

 

EEOC: Quorum Reached

The EEOC reached a quorum on October 7, 2025 when the U.S. Senate confirmed the nomination of Brittany Panuccio to be a commissioner. This resolves the quorum issue which resulted in January when the new administration fired two of the four sitting commissioners and left the EEOC with only two sitting members. Three members are needed for a quorum to make new policy, revisit old policies, vote upon guidance, or take any other significant action. Now that a quorum has been reached, employers are likely to see advancement of Chair Andrea Lucas’ agenda which she laid out in a statement after her appointment.

 

OSHA: Extension of Comment Period for Heat Rule

On September 17, 2025, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) extended the post-hearing comment period on the proposed rule for Heat Injury and Illness Prevention in Outdoor and Indoor Work Settings to October 30, 2025. Only individuals and organizations who participated in the informal public hearing by submitting a Notice of Intent to Appear are eligible to submit post-hearing comments. These comments and supporting data can be submitted electronically.

 

OSHA: New Leadership Approved

OSHA also received a new leader on October 7, 2025 when David Keeling was approved by the U.S. Senate as the Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA. Keeling’s background includes worker safety at Amazon and UPS, including with heat safety standards. Employers should expect renewed scrutiny of the proposed heat safety standard that is now in the post-hearing comment period. Wayne Palmer was also appointed as the New Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health (MSHA). These is less change expected with this appointment since the mine safety standards and mandates are set by statute and can only be changed by the U.S. Congress. MSHA is responsible for investigating hazard complaints, whistleblower complaints, and accidents.

 

First Circuit: Upheld Nationwide Ban on Birthright Citizenship Executive Order

On October 3, 2025, in a pair of cases (New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support v. Donald Trump and New Jersey v. Donald Trump, et. al.), the First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a block on President Trump’s Executive Order that sought to dismantle birthright citizenship protections. The court reaffirmed that birthright citizenship is a constitutional right under the 14th Amendment, rejecting the administration’s argument that citizenship should depend on parental status rather than birth on U.S. soil. This ruling is the latest in a series of court decisions rejecting President Trump’s executive order since it was signed in January. The current administration has indicated an interest to continue judicial review of these decisions, so employers should continue to monitor future developments.

 

Second Circuit: Dispute Over Arbitration Fees is Not a Refusal to Arbitrate

On September 2, 2025, in Frazier v. X Corp., the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled a party’s refusal to pay arbitration fees did not constitute a refusal to arbitrate. Instead, the fee dispute itself needed to be arbitrated. Here, a class of former employees of Twitter (now X Corp.) filed arbitration demands for claims of discrimination, denial of severance benefits, and other claims. The arbitration demand was pursuant to Dispute Resolution Agreements (DRAs) the employees had to enter into as an essential part of the hiring process at Twitter, unless they submitted a valid form to opt out of arbitration. The DRAs identified Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS) as the arbitration organization. While Twitter at first proceeded as required by the DRAs, they then began objecting that the DRAs required the arbitration fees to be shared equally between the parties. JAMS responded that Twitter was required to pay the costs in accordance with its rules, which were incorporated by reference in the DRAs. Twitter disputed this arguing that any fee disputes were to be resolved by the arbitrator and not JAMS. The court agreed and stated that disputes over payment of arbitration fees are a procedural matter to be determined by the arbitrator and not the courts. Courts are only empowered to address a narrow category of disputes of whether arbitration must occur between particular parties over particular issues.

 

Ninth Circuit: Denying Vaccine Accommodation to Firefighter Not Title VII Violation

On September 2, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Snohomish Regional Fire and Rescue (SRFR) did not violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act for denying a religious accommodation to firefighters from its COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The SRFR was able to prove that granting a religious accommodation would cause an undue hardship. Almost 25% of the workforce requested an exemption which would cause a significant cost to SRFR. This cost would be compounded if there were additional absences due to COVID-19 being spread by unvaccinated firefighters. In addition, the firefighters’ job involved interfacing with the public and vulnerable patients so testing, masking, and social distancing was inadequate. SRFR was able to prove additional undue hardships through detailed medical evidence provided by an infectious disease expert. Employers should remember that the undue hardship defense for denying a religious accommodation is a difficult process and very fact-specific. Denials of accommodations should always be evaluated by legal counsel for this reason.

 

Eleventh Circuit: Denial of Gender-Affirming Surgery is Not Sex Discrimination

On September 9, 2025, in Anna Lange v. Houston County, Georgia, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a county health insurance plan’s exclusion of gender-affirming surgery did not violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. This decision reversed a prior panel ruling and diverged from other federal court interpretations that viewed such exclusions as discriminatory. The court reasoned that the exclusion was applied uniformly and did not target individuals based on sex or gender identity, relying in part on the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Skrmetti, which upheld similar uniform bans. In light of this ruling, employers are encouraged to carefully review their health benefits policies, especially if operating in multiple states, and consult legal counsel to ensure compliance with evolving federal and state interpretations of anti-discrimination laws.

 

California: Prohibition on Captive Audience Meetings Temporarily Blocked

Effective September 30, 2025, SB 399, prohibiting captive audience meetings, has been temporarily blocked from enforcement by a preliminary injunction. The law went into effect on January 1, 2025 and prohibited private and public employers from taking adverse action against an employee for failure to attend employer-sponsored meetings or communications where the purpose is to communicate the employer’s opinion about religious or political matters or unionization. The preliminary injunction was granted pursuant to legal challenges to the law that it is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act and is an unconstitutional effort to regulate employer speech. It is likely the State of California will appeal the ruling.

 

Los Angeles, California: Los Angeles Hotel Worker Minimum Wage Ordinance and Hotel Worker Training Ordinance in Effect

Effective September 8, 2025, the minimum wage increase for hotel and airport workers in the City of Los Angeles is in effect. Since Santa Monica follows Los Angeles’ minimum wage rate for hotel workers, their hotel worker minimum wage is also increased. Ordinance No. 188610 contains two requirements which are now reinstated: the Los Angeles Hotel Worker Minimum Wage Ordinance (HWMO) and the Hotel Worker Training Ordinance (HWTO). Pursuant to the HWMO, the increase now brings the minimum wage rate to $22.50. The increase is the result of a failed referendum to prevent the minimum wage increase. The Los Angeles City Clerk has now certified that the referendum did not meet the requirements, so the minimum wage increase can proceed. In addition, hotel or airport employers who do not provide health benefits must provide an additional wage rate per hour equal to the health benefit payment specified in the HWMO. Lastly, pursuant to the HWTO, hotel workers must be trained on health and safety, including identifying instances of human trafficking and sexual and domestic violence, in addition to protecting their own safety. The training requirements are effective December 1, 2025.

 

San Diego, CA: Minimum Wage Increase for Hospitality Workers

The Hospitality Minimum Wage Ordinance increases minimum wage for workers at hotels, event centers, and amusement parks. For employees in hotels and amusement parks, minimum wage will rise to $19/hr. on July 1, 2026, increasing annually to $25/hr. in 2030, with annual cost of living increases thereafter. For employees at event centers, minimum wage will rise to $21.06/hr. on July 1, 2026, increasing annually to $25/hr. in 2030, with annual cost of living increases thereafter. There are additional notice and posting requirements. Hospitality employers must also create and retain contemporaneous written or electronic records documenting each employee’s dates and hours worked and wages paid.

 

Colorado: Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations for Wage Claims

On September 15, 2025, in By the Rockies v. Perez, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that wage claims under the Colorado Minimum Wage Act (MWA) are subject to a two- or three-year statute of limitations. Here, the plaintiff claimed the defendant employer failed to provide them with required meal and rest breaks under the MWA. The plaintiff filed the claim five years after separating from the employer. In addition, the MWA did not have its own statute of limitations period for claims. The plaintiff argued that a six-year limitations period should apply in accordance with a statute that addresses claims for a “liquidated debt or an unliquidated, determinable amount of money.” Although the Colorado Court of Appeals agreed with the plaintiff, the Supreme Court disagreed. The Court reasoned that the MWA and Wage Claim Act are part of a statutory scheme intended to recover unpaid wages. Therefore, the Wage Claim Act’s limitations period should apply – two years for non-willful violations and three years for willful violations. This limitations period also matches the three-year recordkeeping requirement for wage records.

 

District of Columbia: Amendment to Universal Paid Leave and Short-Term Disability

Effective May 1, 2025, D.C. Act 26-68 amends the Universal Paid Leave law (UPL) and its interaction with short-term disability insurance. The amendment prohibits a private disability insurance provider from offsetting or reducing short-term disability benefits based on actual or estimated paid leave benefits the eligible individual may be entitled to under UPL. The prohibition applies regardless of what jurisdiction the insurance policy was issued or written.

 

Florida: Changes to the State’s Open Carry Law

In McDaniels v. State, an appellate court in Florida ruled that the state’s existing Open Carry ban was unconstitutional, making it lawful for eligible adults to openly carry firearms in most public places as of September 25, 2025. Employers retain the right to prohibit firearms on private property, including in workplaces and company vehicles, but must post clear signage and implement policies to enforce this. That said, Florida’s “Bring Your Guns to Work” law limits employer control over firearms in locked private vehicles in parking lots, prohibiting inquiries, searches, or employment actions based on lawful firearm possession. Employers should train staff on handling armed visitors, if applicable, and ensure compliance with sensitive location restrictions, which remain unchanged.

 

Massachusetts: 2026 Paid Family and Medical Leave Updates

The Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave has released its 2026 updates to the Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) program. Effective January 1, 2026, the maximum weekly benefit increases to $1,230.39 per week from $1,170.64. The contribution rate on eligible employee wages will remain the same at 0.88%. This rate has not been changed for three years. Employers should prepare to update their employee notices and top-off policies. Employers with private plans should review their benefits for compliance with the changes for 2026.

 

Minnesota: New Sample PFML Notices and Posters

The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development has published sample notices and workplace postings for employer use on the state’s website for Paid Leave Minnesota. To comply with Minnesota’s Paid Leave program launching January 1, 2026, employers must display a workplace poster by December 1, 2025, and provide each employee with a written notice about their leave rights within 30 days of hire or before premium collection begins. Notices must be in the employee’s primary language and acknowledged in writing or electronically, with employers required to offer access to a computer for review and printing if notices are delivered digitally. Employers using approved equivalent plans must also distribute a separate notice and poster specific to that plan. All notices must include premium contribution details and be retained as proof of compliance.

 

New York, NY: Software Specifications for Fair Workweek Compliance

In September, the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection released voluntary guidance for software developers that create products for fast food employers that support compliance with the Fair Workweek Law (FWL). The FWL requires fast food employers in New York City to give their workers regular schedules, advance notice of schedules, premium pay for schedule changes, and other protections. The new software guidance is aimed as software that addresses the following issues for covered employers: (1) systems integration across scheduling, timekeeping, payroll, and HR management functions; (2) business rules that facilitate compliant scheduling practices; (3) authentication protocols to ensure data integrity; (4) reporting capabilities to support recordkeeping requirements; and (5) automated compliance monitoring tools. The guidance also emphasizes the types of tracking systems that any software should have in order to comply with the FWL.

 

Philadelphia, PA: Amendments to Fair Chance Ordinance

Effective January 6, 2026, amendments to Philadelphia’s Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards Ordinance clarifies certain aspects of the law and expands employer obligations. There are new, specific definitions for the terms felony, misdemeanor, summary offense, and incarceration. An adverse action has been broadened to means any action that negatively affects an applicant or employee’s “compensation, terms, or condition of current or future work or is intended to harass an Applicant or Employee in connection with work, including excessive and unreasonable levels of supervision, refusal to hire or promote, blacklisting, interferences with current employment or employment prospects, contacting law enforcement or a government agency to file a report, including reporting suspected or actual immigration status.” Employers cannot consider misdemeanor convictions over four years old, excluding incarceration. Employers must also perform an assessment based on specific factors before excluding an applicant or employee from consideration for a position. Retaliation protections have also been added. The changes are extensive so employers should review the amendments in their entirety.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase

Employee Tax Deduction Updates on the Big Beautiful Bill

APPLIES TO

All Employers

EFFECTIVE

July 4, 2025

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • There are no changes to Form W-2 for tax year 2025.
  • The Treasury Department released a draft list of tipped jobs that would qualify for the individual tax deduction for received tips.

Discussion

The “Big Beautiful Bill” was signed by the President on July 4th. There were significant changes to individual tax deductions for employee tips and overtime pay. The federal government has until October 2nd to publish updated forms and guidance on how the tax deductions will operate. While employers are waiting on broader guidance, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has released some information regarding the W-2 form and deduction for tips.

 

No Form W-2 Changes

 

The IRS announced in August that there will be no changes to certain forms or withholding tables for tax year 2025 related to the new law.

 

  • Form W-2, existing Forms 1099, and Form 941 and other payroll return forms will remain unchanged for TY 2025.
  • Federal income tax withholding tables will not be updated for these provisions for tax year 2025.
  • Employers and payroll providers should continue using current procedures for reporting and withholding.

 

These decisions from the IRS are intended to avoid disruptions during the tax filing season and to give the IRS, business, and tax professionals enough time to implement the changes effectively. The IRS is working on new guidance and updated forms for tax year 2026. These will include changes to how tips and overtime pay are reported.

 

Tipped Jobs Eligible for Tax Deduction

 

To recap the recent development, starting with the 2025 tax year, tipped employees are eligible for a tax deduction on tips received up to $25,000 annually. The deduction is subject to incremental reduction if the employee’s income exceeds $150,000 for individual filers/$300,000 for joint filers. Tips received must be reported on employee W-2s in order to take advantage of the tax deduction. If the employee is married, they must file a joint return to take advantage of the tax deduction.

 

The Treasury Department recently released a draft list of the qualifying tipped occupations for purposes of receiving a tax deduction on individual tax returns.

 

Category Tipped Jobs
Beverage & Food Service Bartenders; wait staff; nonrestaurant food servers; dining room and cafeteria attendants and bartender helpers; chefs and cooks; food preparation workers; fast food and counter workers; dishwashers; host staff at restaurants, lounges, and coffee shops; bakers
Entertainment & Events Gambling dealers; gambling change persons and booth cashiers; gambling cage workers; gambling sports book writers and runners; dancers; musicians and singers; disc jockeys (excluding radio); entertainers and performers; digital content creators; ushers, lobby attendants, and ticket takers; locker room, coatroom, and dressing room attendants
Hospitality & Guest Services Baggage porters and bellhops; concierges; hotel, motel, and resort desk clerks; maids and housekeeping cleaners
Home Services Home maintenance and repair workers; home landscaping and groundskeeping workers; home electricians; home plumbers; home heating and air conditioning mechanics and installers; home appliance installers and repairers; home cleaning service workers; locksmiths; roadside assistance workers
Personal Services Personal care and service workers; private event planners; private event and portrait photographers; private event videographers; event officiants; pet caretakers; tutors; nannies and babysitters
Personal Appearance & Wellness Skincare specialists; message therapists; barbers, hairdressers, hairstylists, and cosmetologists; shampooers; manicurists and pedicurists; eyebrow threading and waxing technicians; makeup artists; exercise trainers and group fitness instructors; tattoo artists and piercers; tailors; show and leather workers and repairers
Recreation & Instruction Golf caddies; self-enrichment teachers; recreational and tour pilots; tour guides and escorts; travel guides; sports and recreation instructors
Transportation & Delivery Parking and valet attendants; taxi and rideshare drivers and chauffeurs; shuttle drivers; goods delivery people; personal vehicle and equipment cleaners; private and charter bus drivers; water taxi operators and charter boat workers; rickshaw, pedicab, and carriage drivers; home movers

 

Note that this list does not apply to qualifying tipped jobs for tip credit purposes, which is governed by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Expect the qualifying tip deduction list to be published in the Federal Register as proposed regulations along with other information by the October 2nd deadline.

 

Action Items

  1. Review the proposed list of tipped jobs for purposes of tracking tips.
  2. Track tips in accordance with the Big Beautiful Bill for purposes of tax reporting on Form W-2 for 2025.
  3. Update payroll processes to account for the upcoming changes.
  4. Have appropriate personnel trained on the new requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2025 ManagEase