Ninth Circuit: Prior Salary History may be used to Justify Wage Differentials Between Men and Women
|
APPLIES TO All Employers with AK, AZ, CA, GU, HI, |
EFFECTIVE April 27, 2017 |
QUESTIONS? Contact HR On-Call |
Last week, the Ninth Circuit ruled on Rizo v. Yovino, a wage inequality claim brought under the federal Equal Pay Act. In reviewing this case, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a previous case, Kouba v. Allstate Insurance Co., and confirmed that prior salary history may be considered a “factor other than sex” for the purpose of justifying a wage differential.

In Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College, hearing the case en banc, the Seventh Circuit became the first federal court of appeals to determine that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court stated that “it is impossible to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation without discriminating on the basis of sex.”