9th Circuit: State Wage Statement Rules Apply to Interstate Transportation Workers Based in California

APPLIES TO

Employers with AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA, Guam,
and the Northern Mariana Islands Interstate Transportation Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 2, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Ward v. United Airlines, Inc., the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that wage statement requirements under Labor Code § 226 are not preempted by federal law. There, airline pilot and flight attendant employees claimed they did not receive wage statements that complied with California law.

Read more

9th Circuit: California Labor Laws May Apply to Aviation Workers

APPLIES TO

Aviation Employers with AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA,
Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 23, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Bernstein v. Virgin America, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that California’s wage and hour laws are not preempted by federal law in the aviation context. Specifically, employees there alleged that Virgin failed to pay state minimum wage, overtime, and for every hour worked; failed to provide required meal periods, rest breaks, and accurate wage statements; failed to pay waiting time penalties; and violated the Unfair Competition Law.  Employees also sought compensation under the California Labor Code’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA).

Read more

Arizona: Anti-Discrimination Laws Expanded to Prohibit Pregnancy Discrimination

APPLIES TO

All Employers with 15+ AZ Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 19, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On February 4, 2021, Arizona Governor Ducey signed House Bill 2045 into law, amending the Arizona Civil Rights Act definition of the phrase “on the basis of sex” to protect workers from pregnancy or childbirth-related discrimination.  This Civil Rights Act applies to employers of fifteen or more employees.

Like other pregnancy anti-discrimination provisions, the amended Civil Rights Act prohibits employers from discriminating against employees affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.  Such employees must be treated the same way as non-pregnant employees with similar limitations in their ability to work.

This amendment brings the Arizona Civil Rights Act in alignment with the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act.  It also grants the Arizona Civil Rights Division the authority to investigate pregnancy discrimination charges filed by employees.

Action Items

  1. Have anti-discrimination policies updated where applicable.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on the anti-discrimination protections.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2021 ManagEase

California: Rounding Time is OUT!!!

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 25, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Donohue v. AMN Services, LLC, the California Supreme Court said that rounding timekeeping practices cannot be used for purposes of applying meal period premiums. Interestingly, the Court did not say that rounding in general was prohibited, but the ruling essentially makes rounding obsolete.

Read more

Colorado: Emergency Paid Sick Leave Clarified

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CO Employees

EFFECTIVE

April 14, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On February 23, 2021, the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) clarified employers’ public health emergency leave (“PHEL”) obligations under the Healthy Families and Workplaces Act (HFWA).

First, employers must provide employees access to up to 80 hours of PHEL for full-time employees, and an equivalent amount to part-time employees based on the number of hours part-time employees work in a 14-day period. The rules clarified that part-time employees receive PHEL in “the greater of the number of hours the employee (a) is scheduled for work or paid leave in the 14-day period after the leave request, or (b) actually worked in the 14-day period prior to the declaration of the public health emergency or the leave request, whichever is later.”

Additionally, there was some question about whether newly hired employees would be entitled to PHEL. Because PHEL eligibility is tied to when an employee requests leave, all employees are entitled to PHEL regardless of their date of hire. Employers should review these changes immediately as they do not change existing rules, but merely clarify current requirements.

Action Items

  1. Have leave policies updated consistent with current rules.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on clarified leave benefits.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2021 ManagEase

Minnesota: Handbook Disclaimers May not Preclude PTO Policy from Forming a Contract

APPLIES TO

All Employers with MN Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 3, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Hall v. City of Plainview, the Minnesota Supreme Court reviewed whether general disclaimers contained in the employer’s handbook would be sufficient to prevent a PTO policy from forming a contract with employees.

Read more

Philadelphia, PA: Employer Limitations on Credit History Checks Further Expanded

APPLIES TO

All Employers Hiring in City of Philadelphia

EFFECTIVE

February 20, 2021

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In 2016, the City of Philadelphia passed the “Fair Practices Ordinance,” prohibiting employers from discriminating against applicants and employees on the basis of credit history and credit-related information.  On January 20, 2021, an amendment to this ordinance was enacted, decreasing certain employer and job-specific exemptions.

The ordinance prohibits employers from inquiring into, obtaining, or otherwise using credit-related information to take adverse employment actions, such as hiring, firing, promoting, or disciplining an employee or applicant.  Specific exemptions to this provision applied, but under the latest amendments effective February 20, 2021, law enforcement agencies and financial institutions (inclusive of insurance companies, banks, credit unions, etc.) are no longer exempt.

If employers intend to rely on any exceptions, the employer must first (1) disclose reliance upon credit history to the applicant or employee in writing, and provide the specific information the employer references; and (2) give the applicant or employee an opportunity to explain the circumstances surrounding the information prior to taking any adverse action.

Action Items

  1. Review the text of the bill here.
  2. Update hiring and background screening practices for compliance with the amended ordinance.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2021 ManagEase

March Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. Alabama: Employer Protections for COVID-19 Cases
  2. Arkansas: Truck Drivers are not Owed Minimum Wage for Specific Activities
  3. California: Guidance on New Pay Data Reporting Act
  4. California: NEW COVID-19 Resource Website
  5. San Francisco, CA: Hazard Pay Enacted for Certain Industries
  6. New Jersey: State UI Payroll Tax Reduced

Read more

Required Employer Notices May Be Electronically Delivered

APPLIES TO

All Employers

EFFECTIVE

December 23, 2020

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a Field Assistance Bulletin that provides guidance for when employers may electronically post or deliver certain required notices to employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Section 14(c) of the FLSA (Section 14(c)), the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA), and the Service Contract Act (SCA).

Read more

New Independent Contractor Rule – Almost!

APPLIES TO

All Employers

EFFECTIVE

Delayed

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On January 7, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published a final rule clarifying independent contractor relationships. Specifically, the rule reaffirms using the “economic reality” test to determine whether an individual is in business for themselves (independent contractor) or is economically dependent on a potential employer for work.

The DOL identifies two “core factors” in making this determination: (1) the nature and degree of control over the work; and (2) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative and/or investment. There are three other factors that may serve as additional guideposts in the analysis, particularly when the two core factors do not point to the same classification, including (1) the amount of skill required for the work; (2) the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the potential employer; and (3) whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. The actual practice of the worker and the potential employer is more relevant than what may be contractually or theoretically possible. The final rule also provides six fact-specific examples applying the factors.

The rule was set to go into effect on March 8, 2021. However, because of the pending regulatory review ordered by the current presidential administration, it is now proposed to take effect May 7, 2021, assuming it passes review. At this point, that would be a big assumption. The longer the rule is delayed the more likely there will be legal challenges to the rule. Continue to look for updates on this developing topic.

Action Items

  1. Review the final rule here.
  2. Review independent contractor status with legal counsel for compliance.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2021 ManagEase