Oregon

Oregon: Workplace Safety Requirements for Behavioral Health Employers

APPLIES TO

All Behavioral Health Employers with Employees in OR

EFFECTIVE

As Indicated

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

 

Quick Look

  • Behavioral health employers are required to provide safety training to new workers within 90 days of their hire and every three years thereafter.
  • Behavioral health employers that contract with the Oregon Health Authority must implement a written plan for the physical safety of their workers.

Discussion

Oregon behavioral health employers should be aware of two new workplace safety requirements. Covered employers include, but are not limited to, residential treatment facilities, sobering facilities, halfway houses, and emergency shelters providing support for individuals who have mental health disorders or substance abuse disorders.

 

Safety Training for Workers. Effective July 1, 2026, HB 2024 requires behavioral health employers to provide safety training to new workers within 90 days of their hire and every three years thereafter. The safety training must include:

 

  • The potential risks that a worker may face in the work environment of a particular behavioral health setting;
  • Protocols for using safety equipment, emergency communication devices and alert systems in emergency or crisis situations;
  • De-escalation techniques for managing and mitigating potentially aggressive behavior from clients; and
  • The available options for reporting alleged workplace safety violations and allegations of discrimination, retaliation or harassment to the Occupational Safety and Health Division of the Department of Consumer and Business Services, the Bureau of Labor and Industries and other relevant state agencies, including the rights and protections afforded to workers who engage in such reporting.

 

The training must include simulated scenarios and role-playing. Employers must also retain records documenting the completion of the training provided including the date of the training, topics covered, and the names of the workers who attended.

 

Written Safety Plan. Effective July 1, 2027, HB 4069 requires behavioral health employers that contract with the Oregon Health Authority to adopt a written plan addressing the physical safety of lone workers, meaning employees who provide or assist with behavioral health services without a colleague nearby or without close or direct supervision. The plan must cover the safety of the physical worksite, including how employees can report structural security hazards and the time frame within which the employer must respond to those reports. The plan must also describe the safety training required for covered employees.

 

Action Items

  1. Conduct required safety trainings for new workers and every three years thereafter.
  2. Maintain records of completion of required safety training.
  3. Develop and distribute a written safety plan, as applicable.

 

 

Oregon: Amended Workers’ Compensation Total Disability Benefits

For injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2027, SB 1519 provides for changes to temporary and permanent disability benefits. Temporary total disability benefits will be equal to: (1) 75% of the worker’s wage that is equal to or less than 75% of the average weekly wage in effect on the date of injury, but not less than the amount of 90% of the worker’s wage a week or the amount of $50 a week, whichever amount is less; and (2) 65% of the worker’s wage that is greater than 75% of the average weekly wage, but not more than 133% of the average weekly wage, in effect on the date of injury. Permanent total disability benefits will be equal to: (1) 75% of the worker’s wage that is equal to or less than 75% of the average weekly wage, but not less than 33% of the average weekly wage, in effect on the date of injury; and (2) 65% of the worker’s wage that is greater than 75% of the average weekly wage, but not more than 133% of the average weekly wage, in effect on the date of injury.


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania: Rest Break Activity May be Covered by Workers’ Compensation

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in PA

EFFECTIVE

JUL 15, 2026

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

 

Quick Look

  • To determine whether an employee’s injury during a rest break is covered by workers’ compensation, the key factor isn’t whether a break is official or informal, but how much genuine free time and flexibility the worker actually had.

Discussion

In Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Baker, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court said that an employee who is injured while on a rest break may be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. Here, a pharmacy technician at a grocery store was seriously injured when she was struck by a vehicle while crossing the street directly in front of her workplace. She was on one of her two mandatory 15-minute breaks at the time, heading to grab lunch at a nearby restaurant. The employe filed for workers’ compensation benefits, but the employer disputed the claim, arguing that she was on her own time and not doing anything work-related when she was hit, so her injury shouldn’t be covered.

 

The case bounced back and forth: a workers’ compensation judge initially sided with the employer and denied benefits, reasoning that the employee was simply on a personal errand (getting lunch) when the accident happened. However, the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board disagreed and sent the case back for reconsideration, applying a long-standing legal principle called the “personal comfort doctrine.” This doctrine holds that when an employee briefly steps away from work to tend to basic needs (like eating, smoking a cigarette, or getting a drink of water) they’re still considered to be “in the course of employment” for compensation purposes, because taking care of those basic needs is viewed as an ordinary and expected part of any job, not a break from it. On reconsideration, a different judge granted the employee’s benefits, and the Board upheld that decision.

 

The employer then appealed to the Commonwealth Court, arguing that the employee’s injury shouldn’t count because her 15-minute break was a formal, scheduled break during which she had the freedom to do whatever she wanted, unlike a quick, informal pause to grab a snack while still effectively “on duty.” Based on historical precedent, the court found that the key factor isn’t whether a break is official or informal, but how much genuine free time and flexibility the worker actually had. Because the employee’s break was so short (just 15 minutes) that she barely had time to do anything besides cross the street and grab food before having to return, the court found she didn’t have meaningful autonomy to pursue unrelated personal activities — she was essentially just tending to a basic need (hunger) in the small window she was given.

 

The court ultimately ruled in the employee’s favor, agreeing that her injury was still covered by workers’ compensation because getting food during a mandatory, brief break counts as an “act of ministration” to her personal needs rather than a true departure from work duties. The court also noted that it didn’t matter that the employee was technically jaywalking when she was hit; under workers’ compensation law, an employee’s carelessness generally doesn’t disqualify them from receiving benefits. As a result, the court affirmed the ruling awarding the employee disability benefits.

 

Action Items

  1. Review workers’ compensation claims with legal counsel before taking adverse action.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

South Carolina

Discussion

South Carolina: Civil Air Patrol Leave Coming Soon

Effective October 1, 2026, SB 1043 requires all employers, regardless of size, to provide civil air patrol leave to eligible employees. Eligible employees are those who are a member of the official civilian auxiliary of the United States Air Force known as the Civil Air Patrol, primarily represented within the State by the South Carolina Wing of Civil Air Patrol. Employers must provide 30 days of leave per calendar year for employees who respond to an emergency service operation of the civil air patrol and ten days of leave per calendar year for employees to engage in civil air patrol-related training. Private employers can provide paid or unpaid leave. Employers must provide leave as a lump sum at the start of each calendar year. Unused leave will be forfeited at the end of each calendar year and will not be carried over to the new calendar year. An employer may deny a request for Civil Air Patrol leave for an employee who has been designated as an essential employee. Civil Air Patrol Leave is job protected leave, and employees are also protected from retaliation and discrimination for exercising their rights under the law.


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Vermont

Discussion

Vermont: Legal Possession Limit of Cannabis Increased

Effective July 1, 2026, Vermont increased the daily purchase limit for cannabis flower from one ounce to two ounces, with the stated goal of shifting consumers away from the illicit market and toward the state’s licensed retail marketplace. While this change does not alter existing employer obligations, employers may still maintain and enforce a drug-free workplace policy, including restrictions on the use or possession of cannabis during work hours or on company property.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase