Connecticut

Discussion

Connecticut: More Legislative Updates!

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in CT

EFFECTIVE

OCT 1, 2026

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

 

Quick Look

  • Connecticut has enacted several new laws affecting distracted driving, employee monitoring, data privacy, and public accommodations.

Discussion

Connecticut has passed a series of new laws touching on distracted driving, employee monitoring, data privacy, and public accommodations. Key aspects of the new bills are summarized below.

 

Distracted Driving and Driver Safety. HB 5464 amends Connecticut’s distracted driving law to prohibit a person, including a driver of a commercial motor vehicle, from operating a motor vehicle on a highway: (1) while holding or supporting a mobile electronic device with any part of their body; (2) while using a mobile electronic device unless it is being used in a hands-free mode; (3) while reading, viewing, or typing a text message or other nonvoice message or communication on such a device; or (4) when a video or moving image on such a device, or an installed screen or similar device, is visible to the person while seated in the normal operating position (certain exceptions apply). The same bill also requires Transportation Network Companies (TNC) to adopt service animal nondiscrimination policies and requires TNC drivers to annually complete sexual assault prevention and driver education training. Employers with employees who drive as part of their job duties, particularly those operating commercial motor vehicles or working as TNC drivers, should review this expanded prohibition and update relevant policies and training accordingly.

 

Employee Monitoring and Surveillance. SB 439 and SB 472 both address electronic surveillance in the workplace. SB 439 carves out an exemption for third-party self-service kiosks from the state’s existing prohibition on electronic surveillance devices in employee lounges. SB 472 imposes a new affirmative obligation on employers to notify employees of electronic surveillance practices, including disclosing which prohibited activities may justify surveillance without advance notice. Under the amended law, employers who engage in electronic monitoring must provide each employee with a written statement specifying where and what types of electronic monitoring may occur.

 

Privacy and Data Security. SB 4 amends the Connecticut Data Privacy Act to establish new requirements for facial recognition technology (FRT). Specifically, any controller using FRT on its premises for security, fraud prevention, or similar purposes must exclusively match images against a database it maintains itself (rather than a third-party database) and post signage at premises entrances disclosing FRT use and linking to its FRT policy. Notably, this signage requirement does not apply to entrances restricted to authorized employees, giving employers some flexibility when using FRT for internal security purposes in employee-only areas. Employers using facial recognition tools on their premises, whether for building security, loss prevention, or similar purposes, should review their practices for compliance with these new database and signage requirements.

 

Discrimination and Public Access. SB 90 expands the state’s hate crime statute to cover certain discriminatory public accommodation practices. While primarily directed at public accommodations rather than the employment relationship itself, employers open to the public should be aware of this expanded criminal exposure.

 

Action Items

  1. Update distracted driving policies to reflect expanded mobile device restrictions.
  2. Review policies applicable to TNC drivers and update training and nondiscrimination requirements, as applicable.
  3. Update employee electronic monitoring notices to comply with new written disclosure requirements.
  4. Review the use of facial recognition technology on company premises for compliance.
  5. Have appropriate personnel trained on applicable requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Delaware

Discussion

Delaware: Updates to Rules for Wage Payment

Effective May 7, 2026, Delaware updated its rules regarding deductions from wages and wage notification. The updates address meal breaks in certain situations. Employees exempt from meal breaks must be allowed to eat meals at their workstation or other authorized locations and to use restroom facilities as necessary. These employees should be compensated for this time. The 30-minute break requirement also does not apply where public safety or an individual or property may be injured, harmed, or damaged during the course of that break. There is now also an exception for employers who have fewer than five employees on a single shift. Employers can comply with the requirement to pay wages by issuing a payroll debit card. Wage theft is also defined as a crime punished by civil penalties and criminal charges and can include a potential felony conviction for repeat offenders. Deductions must be made only if allowed by law or are expressly authorized in writing by the employee and for the benefit of the employee. Employers also must provide written notice of wage rates to each new hire and post it in a prominent and accessible place at the worksite. The notice must contain: (1) rate or rates of pay, including any additional compensation related to the payment of wages; (2) how the employee is paid: by the hour, shift, day, week, commission, etc.; (3) the regular payday; (4) a detailed statement for each pay period; (5) official name of the employer and any other names used for doing business; (6) address and phone number of the employer’s main office or principal location; (7) allowances taken as part of minimum wages, including tips, meals and lodging deductions; and (8) employment practices and policies regarding vacation pay, sick leave and comparable matters. The rules have also expanded the scale of investigations into violations so employers need to ensure they are in compliance.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Florida

Discussion

Florida: Expanded Background Screening Requirements for Care Providers

Effective July 1, 2026, SB 1168 amends Florida’s Level 2 background screening requirements for individuals employed by or volunteering with care providers and other qualified entities. The bill adds several new offenses to the list of disqualifying crimes, including DUI manslaughter, domestic violence, offenses against intellectual property, offenses against computer users and systems, animal cruelty, counterfeiting of driver’s licenses or identification cards, threats and extortion, bribery, and introducing contraband into county detention facilities. The law also closes a loophole by prohibiting individuals screened through the Care Provider Background Screening Clearinghouse from denying or failing to acknowledge prior arrests, even where those records have been sealed or expunged. Employers in the health care, childcare, elder care, and education sectors that rely on Level 2 screenings in Florida should update their background check protocols to reflect the expanded list of disqualifying offenses.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Georgia

Discussion

Georgia: New Criminal Background Check Requirements for Mental Health Facilities

APPLIES TO

Certain Mental Health Facilities Employers with Employees in GA

EFFECTIVE

JUL 1, 2026

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

 

Quick Look

  • Owners, applicants and employees of licensed community living facilities, drug abuse treatment and education programs, and adult residential mental health programs are required to submit to criminal background checks, license status check, and registry checks.
  • Facilities are required to terminate employees who do not pass such checks.

Discussion

Effective July 1, 2026, HB 1097 requires the owners, applicants and employees of licensed community living facilities, drug abuse treatment and education programs, and adult residential mental health programs to submit to criminal background checks, license status check, and registry checks. This includes individuals who have direct access to individuals such as duties that involve routine personal contact with a patient, resident, or client, including, but not limited to, face-to-face contact, hands-on physical assistance, verbal cuing, reminding, standing by or monitoring or activities that require the person to be routinely alone with the patient’s, resident’s, or client’s property or access to such property or financial information, including, but not limited to, the patient’s, resident’s, or client’s checkbook, debit and credit cards, resident trust funds, banking records, stock accounts, or brokerage accounts.

 

A criminal records check means a search of the criminal records maintained by the Georgia Crime Information Center and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to determine whether an owner, applicant, or employee has a criminal record. A registry check means a review of the nurse aide registry, the national and state sexual offender registries, and the List of Excluded Individuals and Entities as authorized in Sections 1128 and 1156 of the federal Social Security Act, as it existed on February 1, 2018, or any other registry useful for the administration of background checks for applicable facilities.

 

Negatively affected applicants or employees can challenge the findings. A personnel file containing evidence of the required checks must be maintained by each facility. Facilities are required to terminate employees who do not pass such checks. A facility that does not terminate an employee who has been found to have an ineligible or failed a registry check shall be liable for a civil monetary penalty in the amount of $500.00 for each day that a violation occurs, not to exceed a total of $10,000.00.

 

Action Items

  1. Review and update policies and procedures for required background checks, as applicable.
  2. Obtain consent prior to conducting background checks.
  3. Maintain personnel files with the results of the required background checks.
  4. Have appropriate personnel trained on background screening requirements.

 

 

Georgia: Updates to Service Dog Requirements

Effective July 1, 2026, HB 668 amends several titles of the Official Code of Georgia to modernize and strengthen protections for service dogs and the individuals who rely on them. The bill replaces references to “assistance dogs” and “guide dogs” with the unified term “service dog,” which is broadly defined to include any dog individually trained to perform tasks directly assisting a physically or mentally impaired person. It also expands the protected class of persons from those with specific physical or sensory disabilities to any “physically or mentally impaired person,” a broader category that includes those with cognitive, psychological, developmental, or learning disabilities. New definitions are introduced for key terms including “activities of daily living,” “owner training,” and “trainer,” and the bill extends rights related to public accommodations, public transit, and housing to this wider group of individuals. The amended law also creates a tiered penalty structure for offenses involving service dogs such as interfering with a service dog (frightening, obstructing, or allowing one’s own dog to harass it) Additionally, the bill creates a misdemeanor penalty for individuals who deliberately misrepresent themselves as qualified to use or train a service dog to obtain accommodations under the law.

 

Georgia: Human Trafficking Prevention Training

Effective July 1, 2026, SB 570 amends the Georgia Human Trafficking Prevention Training Act to require all inn employees and third-party short-term rental property managers to complete annual human trafficking awareness training within 60 days of hire and by December 31 of their first full year, with exemptions for owner-managed properties, properties rented fewer than 15 days per year, and individuals who completed qualifying training within 12 months prior to July 1, 2026. Training content must cover trafficking identification, labor vs. sex trafficking distinctions, employee reporting roles, and hotline contact information. Covered employers must also adopt written reporting policies, maintain training acknowledgment records for the duration of employment plus one year post-separation, and produce those records to the Office of the Attorney General within ten business days of a written request.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Hawaii

Discussion

Hawaii: Background Check Requirements for Healthcare Facilities

Effective July 1, 2026, Hawaii’s HB 2576 clarifies and streamlines background check requirements for healthcare facility applicants, operators, and direct patient access employees. The law distinguishes between a “fingerprint-based background check” (e.g., a one-time fingerprint search of state and FBI criminal history databases) and a “name-based background check” (e.g., a review of abuse, neglect, and criminal history records using an individual’s name and identifying information). Most individuals will now undergo a single fingerprint-based background check, with exceptions for certain licensed healthcare professionals and hospital employees, along with an initial name-based background check. Operators and direct patient access employees must also undergo a name-based background check every two years thereafter. The law permits hospitals to conduct their own name-based background checks in lieu of the state, allows background check fees to be passed on to the individuals screened, and provides good-faith immunity from civil liability for entities relying on the results. Employers and operators of healthcare facilities in Hawaii should update their screening protocols to reflect the new definitions and recurring check requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Idaho

Discussion

Idaho: Updates on Background Checks

APPLIES TO

As Indicated

EFFECTIVE

JUL 1, 2026

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

 

Quick Look

  • Employers who have access to children, elderly, or vulnerable adults must use fingerprint-based background screening.

Discussion

The Idaho legislature recently enacted bills requiring employers who have access to children, elderly, or vulnerable adults to use fingerprint-based background screening.

 

Background Check Requirements. HB 494 requires fingerprint-based background checks for individuals working with the Department of Health and Welfare with direct access to children, elderly, or vulnerable adults, such as daycare facilities, home health agencies, and assisted living facilities. The requirement applies to employees, contractors, and volunteers for a number of listed entities or programs. An employer that acts in reasonable reliance on the clearance determination of a background check is immune from liability thereafter.

 

Background Check Process. HB 521 says that any private, noncriminal justice entities qualifying to participate under the National Child Protection Act of 1993 and Volunteers for Children Act that serve vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities must submit a request for fingerprint screening to the bureau for a covered individual, independent contractor, vendor, employee, or volunteer who has supervised or unsupervised access to children, the elderly, or individuals with disabilities. Notably, criminal history records must be kept confidential.

 

Action Items

  1. Implement background check processes consistent with the new requirements.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on background screening requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Illinois

Discussion

Illinois: New AI Safety Rules

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in Illinois; AI Developers and Businesses Procuring Frontier AI Models

EFFECTIVE

JAN 1, 2027

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

 

Quick Look

  • Illinois has enacted the Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act, imposing rigorous transparency, auditing, and incident-reporting obligations on “large frontier developers,” with steep financial penalties for noncompliance.

Discussion

Illinois Governor Pritzker signed the Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act (SB 315), establishing multiple transparency, auditing, and incident-reporting requirements for AI developers, along with steep financial penalties for noncompliance. Set to go into effect on January 1, 2027, the law draws a key distinction between “frontier developers” (e.g., those training AI models exceeding a computing threshold of 1026 floating-point operations) and “large frontier developers” (e.g., frontier developers with $500 million or more in annual gross revenue). The core substantive obligations apply only to the latter group, limiting the law’s direct reach to a smaller pool. Even so, employers that procure or integrate frontier AI models into their operations should be attentive to key features of the law:

 

  • Transparency Requirements. Developers must publicly disclose how they apply industry safety standards, assess model capabilities and catastrophic risk, and plan to respond to safety incidents, through a detailed public transparency framework centered on risk mitigation.
  • Mandatory Third-Party Audits. Illinois is the first state to require developers to engage independent third-party auditors to validate compliance, with audits required annually.
  • Incident Reporting Obligations. Developers must report critical safety incidents within 72 hours of discovery, shrinking to 24 hours where there is an imminent risk of death or serious physical injury. Reports go to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Attorney General, and to law enforcement or public safety agencies where applicable. The law also includes enhanced whistleblower protections.
  • The Illinois Attorney General may impose fines of up to $1 million for a first violation and up to $3 million for subsequent violations.

 

For Illinois employers, the most immediate concern is the potential liability that can flow down through vendor contracts when procuring frontier AI models, particularly around privacy issues or breaches. Ahead of the law’s effective date, employers should make sure to review vendor agreements and confirm that AI vendors are prepared to meet the new obligations.

 

Action Items

  1. Inventory AI vendors and tools used across the organization to identify which, if any, are subject to the law’s new requirements.
  2. Review AI procurement contracts for provisions addressing vendor compliance.
  3. Consult with legal counsel on indemnification provisions and other risk exposure provisions of vendor contracts.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Indiana

Discussion

Indiana: Legislative Updates

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in IN

EFFECTIVE

JUL 1, 2026

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

 

Quick Look

  • Indiana’s discrimination law is amended to expressly incorporate Title VII violations as state-law violations, significantly expanding liability exposure for covered employers.
  • Indiana’s new FAIRNESS Act prohibits employers from knowingly or intentionally employing unauthorized workers, but provides a safe harbor for employers that use E-Verify or comparable diligence practices.
  • Indiana increases battery penalties for assaults against health care and school employees and creates a new semiannual reporting obligation to the Indiana Department of Labor for employers of those workers.

Discussion

Indiana passed several bills this session impacting employer obligations across discrimination, immigration compliance, and workplace violence. Key aspects of each are summarized below.

 

Employer Liability Under State Discrimination Law. HB 1193 amends the definition of “discriminatory practice” under the Indiana Civil Rights Law (ICRL) to expressly provide that any violation of Title VII also constitutes a violation of state law. The practical impact is greatest for Indiana employers with 6 to 14 employees that fall below Title VII’s 15-employee threshold and have historically been outside federal discrimination law’s substantive reach. Now, the ICRL’s lower six-employee threshold holds those employers to the same discrimination and retaliation standards as larger, Title VII-covered employers. Separately, the bill also reduces the Indiana Civil Rights Commission’s role in litigating claims on behalf of individuals, shifting more of that burden to private parties and the state.

 

New FAIRNESS Act. Indiana’s new Forging American Independence, Restoring National Exceptionalism Safely and Securely (FAIRNESS) Act (SB 76) prohibits employers from knowingly or intentionally recruiting, hiring, or continuing to employ unauthorized workers. “Employer” is defined broadly to include any person or agent employing workers in Indiana. Importantly, the law provides a compliance safe harbor when an employer is not in violation if it exercised “reasonable diligence” before recruiting, hiring, or continuing to employ the individual, which includes using E-Verify (absent circumstances suggesting the verification was unreliable) or following industry-standard verification practices.

 

The Indiana attorney general is empowered to enforce the law, typically by issuing a Civil Investigatory Demand to employers under investigation. Before filing an enforcement action, the attorney general must provide written notice of probable cause, giving the employer 15 business days to either demonstrate reasonable diligence or submit a corrective affidavit confirming it has terminated unauthorized workers, verified all current employees’ work eligibility, and will not knowingly employ unauthorized workers going forward. Satisfying either option stops the enforcement action.

 

If an employer fails to satisfy either option and the attorney general determines probable cause exists, the state may bring an action to enjoin the violation and seek additional relief, including a graduated penalty structure tied to an employer’s operating authorizations (licenses, permits, certificates, registrations, charters, and similar authorizations):

 

  • First violation (single): Suspension of all operating authorizations at the violation location for five business days.
  • First violation (multiple): Suspension at affected locations for ten business days.
  • Repeat violation: Suspension at affected locations for 180 days.
  • After 180-day suspension: Permanent revocation of all operating authorizations at affected locations.
  • Willful violations (three or more locations, after prior revocation): Permanent revocation of all operating authorizations statewide.

 

Courts may also impose a probationary period of six months to two years with quarterly compliance reporting. Notably, a suspended or revoked employer remains responsible for its tax withholding obligations.

 

Workplace Violence Against Healthcare and School Employees. HB 1249, a broader criminal law bill, increases penalties for battery committed against certain health care and school employees. More significantly for employers, the law creates a new semiannual reporting obligation, requiring employers of health care or school employees who are victims of battery to report these incidents to the Indiana Department of Labor. Relatedly, the law repeals the prior framework that required public schools to report student-caused employee injuries to the Department of Education for inclusion in a public database, consolidating that reporting into the new Department of Labor process.

 

Action Items

  1. Review anti-discrimination, harassment, and retaliation policies and procedures for compliance.
  2. Review employment eligibility verification practices for compliance.
  3. Consult with legal counsel on application of employer safe harbor protections.
  4. Implement tracking and reporting procedures for covered workplace batteries, as applicable.
  5. Have appropriate personnel trained on all updated requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

 

Kansas

Discussion

Kansas: New Portable Benefits Framework for Independent Contractors

Effective July 1, 2026, HB 2602 establishes a voluntary framework allowing “hiring parties” (a term that includes traditional businesses and internet or app-based platforms) to contribute to portable benefit plans for independent contractors. These plans may fund health insurance, income replacement or disability insurance, life insurance, or retirement benefits. Contributions may come from the contractor, the hiring party, or a portion of the contractor’s compensation withheld under a clear, written, and voluntary opt-in arrangement that the contractor may revoke at any time. Importantly, the law expressly states that contributing to a portable benefit plan cannot be used as a factor in determining a worker’s employment classification. The law also creates a state income tax subtraction modification, beginning with tax years after December 31, 2026, for amounts hiring parties and independent contractors contribute to these accounts, to the extent not already excluded from federal adjusted gross income.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase

Kentucky

Discussion

Kentucky: Updates to Physical Therapy Practice Act

Effective July 14, 2026, HB 48 makes sweeping amendments to the licensing and regulation of physical therapists and physical therapist assistants under KRS Chapter 327. Most notably for employers, the law requires any physical therapist, physical therapist assistant, or their employer with actual or direct knowledge of certain misconduct to report the individual to the Board of Physical Therapy, including convictions for a felony or specified misdemeanors bearing on the person’s fitness to practice, suspected licensing fraud or negligent conduct, adverse licensing actions in another jurisdiction, or practicing without a valid license or privilege. Additional changes include, among other things, the handling of sexual misconduct allegations, purchase of professional liability insurance, and updated penalties and fees for statutory violations. Employers of physical therapists and physical therapist assistants in Kentucky should review the new reporting obligations and implement procedures for compliance.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2026 ManagEase