Posts

June Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. U.S. Supreme Court: Title VII Claims to the EEOC are Merely Procedural and Not Jurisdictional to Courts
  2. U.S. Supreme Court: State Wage and Hour Rules Don’t Apply to Workers on the Outer Continental Shelf
  3. DOL Issued Updated Poster for Federal Contractors and Subcontractors
  4. California: July 1st REMINDERS for Employers
  5. Emeryville, CA: July 1st Minimum Wage Increase Paused for Small Independent Restaurants
  6. Colorado: Wage Garnishment Reform on the Horizon
  7. Connecticut: Minimum Wage Increasing to $15 an Hour
  8. Minneapolis, MN: Sick and Safe Time Rule Is Still Up in the Air
  9. Kansas City, MO: Bans Pre-Employment Salary History Inquiries
  10. Nevada: Mandatory Safety Training Expanded to Trade Show and Convention Workers
  11. New Jersey: Required Workplace Postings Receive an Update
  12. Texas: Dallas and San Antonio Paid Sick Leave Set to Go into Effect August 1st

Read more

March Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. U.S. Supreme Court Reversed Ninth Circuit Equal Pay Ruling Based on Judge’s Death
  2. Fifth Circuit: Restated Its Position that Title VII Does Not Protect Sexual Orientation
  3. California: Guidance on New Agricultural Overtime Pay Requirements
  4. Alameda, CA: City Minimum Wage Increases to $13.50 in July, Regardless of Employer Size
  5. Florida: Miami Beach Minimum Wage Struck Down
  6. Illinois: $9.25 Minimum Wage by January 2020, With New Possible Penalties
  7. Minneapolis, MN: Minimum Wage Increase Approved
  8. New Jersey: $10 Minimum Wage in July 2019, $15 by 2024
  9. Westchester County, New York: Bans the Box
  10. Portland, Oregon: Prohibits Discrimination Against Atheists and Agnostics
  11. West Virginia: Federal Law Enforcement Pension Freed From State Taxes

Read more

Massachusetts: Sick Pay is Not Considered Wages Under State Law

APPLIES TO

Employers with MA Employees

EFFECTIVE

January 29, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Tze-Kit v. Massachusetts Port Authority, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court stated that sick pay is not considered wages under the Massachusetts Payment of Wages Law.  Employers are not required to pay out accrued, unused sick pay as part of an employee’s final pay upon separation of employment.

April Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. IRS Reduces Family HSA Contribution Limit for 2018
  2. Federal Spending Bill Prevents Employers from Skimming Employee Tips
  3. California: New Workplace Safety Rules for Hotel Housekeepers
  4. Colorado: Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations on Wage Claims
  5. New York: Guidance on New York Paid Family Leave Payroll Deductions

Read more

Minnesota: Employers Cannot Fire Employees for Refusing to Share Tips

APPLIES TO

All Employers of MN Employees

EFFECTIVE

October 11, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Supreme Court of Minnesota recently affirmed that employers cannot terminate an employee for refusal or failing to share gratuities.  In Burt v. Rackner, Inc., a bartender was instructed to share a greater portion of his tips with bussing staff.  Upon his failure to do so, the bartender was terminated, and he filed a lawsuit for wrongful termination.

October Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. U.S Federal Contractor Updates
  2. Alabama: City of Birmingham Approves Nondiscrimination Ordinance
  3. California: Cal/OSHA Says Federal OSHA Reporting Requirements do not Apply to CA Employers
  4. Illinois: Amendments to the Illinois Human Rights Act Codify Religious Garb Protections
  5. Kentucky: Supreme Court Permits Wage and Hour Class Actions
  6. New York: 24-Hour Non-Residential Home Care Attendants Must be Paid for Sleep and Meal Periods
  7. Texas: New Leave Protection for Foster Parents and Preference for Veterans in Employment
  8. Wisconsin: Court of Appeals Upholds “Right to Work” Law

Read more

Washington: Supreme Court Clarifies Meal Break Requirements

APPLIES TO

All Employers with WA Employees

EFFECTIVE

August 10, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Requirements for the timing and length of an employee’s meal break may vary from state to state.  In Washington, an employee who works five or more consecutive hours must be provided a minimum 30-minute meal period, unless the employee chooses to waive the meal break period. The Washington Supreme Court recently clarified the standard to determine an employer’s liability for a missed meal break.

Specifically, the state supreme court stated that a when an employee provides evidence that he or she did not receive a timely meal break, a greater burden exists on employers to prove that no violation of the Washington Administrative Code § 296-126-092 truly occurred.  An employer merely providing an employee the opportunity to take a meal break may not be sufficient to resolve employer liability. Rather, the employer must demonstrate either that no violation occurred and that the employee was actually provided a meal break, or that a valid meal waiver exists.

Action Items

  1. Revise procedures to ensure start and end times of employee meal periods are documented.  If an employee elects to waive a meal period, obtain a signed waiver from the employee.
  2. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2017 ManagEase, Incorporated.

How the Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Ruling Impacts Employers

APPLIES TO

All Employers

EFFECTIVE

June 26, 2015

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On June 26, 2015, the closing of Obergefell v. Hodges resulted in a landmark decision by the U.S Supreme Court: same-sex marriages must be licensed and recognized by all states in the nation. Although 37 states had previously legalized same-sex marriage, the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision will now have significant impact on the 13 states where same-sex marriage was not previously recognized.

Read more