Posts

July Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. California: Janitorial Employers Must Register with Labor Commissioner
  2. New Hampshire Adds Gender Identity as a Protected Category
  3. North Carolina Increases Hiring Opportunities for Individuals with a Criminal History
  4. Texas: 5th Circuit Requires Employer Signature on Mutual Arbitration Agreements
  5. Vermont Issues New Guidance on Marijuana in the Workplace
  6. Washington, D.C. Approves Increased Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers
  7. Washington Governor Fights SCOTUS Arbitration Class Action Waiver Ruling

Read more

Fourth Circuit: FLSA Lodging Credit Still Applies to Hours-Worked Agreements

APPLIES TO

All Employers of MD, NC, SC, VA, and WV Employees

EFFECTIVE

January 25, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The FLSA requires employees to be paid for all hours worked, and permits employers and employees to agree on the number of hours worked when the employee lives on the employer’s premises, provided that the FLSA’s wage and hour requirements are followed (e.g., minimum wage, overtime paid, etc.). In Balbed v. Eden Park Guest House, LLC, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that even when an employer and employee enter into a reasonable agreement of hours worked, the FLSA’s requirements for calculating the lodging credit are still enforceable.

September Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. The Recent Federal Overtime Exemption Rule is Diminishing
  2. NLRB: More Examples of What is or isn’t Protected Concerted Activities on Facebook
  3. EEOC Must Reconsider Wellness Regulations
  4. Seventh Circuit: EEOC May Investigate Despite Right-to-Sue Letter and Issue of Judgment
  5. Arizona, Maryland, Wyoming:  Now Part of the E-Verify RIDE Program
  6. Berkeley, CA: Minimum Wage Increase, Paid Sick Leave, and Work Schedule Rules Will Soon Be In Effect
  7. San Diego, CA:  Equal Pay Bill for City Contractors and Consultants
  8. Santa Clara, CA: Santa Clara City’s Minimum Wage to Increase in 2018
  9. Connecticut: Anti-Discrimination Protections Expanded for Veterans
  10. Georgia: Amended Law Now Preempts Predictive Scheduling Ordinances
  11. New Jersey:  Anti-Discrimination Protections for Military and Veterans Expanded
  12. New York: Guidance on Tax Treatment of PFL Contributions and Benefits now Available
  13. Nevada: Pregnant Workers’ Fairness Act Poster Now Available
  14. North Carolina:  Fair Classification Act Emphasizes State Focus on Proper Employee Classification
  15. Texas: Hurricane Harvey Relief for Employees
  16. Washington:  New Biometric Information Protection law

Read more

May Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This HR Alert addresses the following topics:
  1. H-1B Visa Petition Cap Reached; New Program Focuses on Targeting H-1B Fraud
  2. OSHA Delays Effective Date of Final Rule on Beryllium Exposure Again
  3. Updated Pay Transparency Poster for Federal Contractors
  4. California: Wage Orders Have Been Updated and Must be Posted by Employers
  5. Connecticut: Restaurants Cannot Use Tip Credits for Delivery Drivers
  6. North Carolina: Controversial “Bathroom Bill” Repealed, New Bill Introduced
  7. New York: 24-Hour, Non-Residential Home Care Workers Must be Paid for All 24 Hours
  8. New York City, NY: Inquiries into Prior Salary History Prohibited for City Agencies
  9. REMINDER: Washington, DC’s Universal Paid Leave Act Became Effective on April 7, 2017

Read more

Fourth Circuit: Unique Six Factor Test to Determine Joint Employer Status

APPLIES TO

All Employers with MD, NC, SC, VA and WV Employees

EFFECTIVE

January 25, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Salinas v. Commercial Interiors Inc., the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently established a unique six factor test for determining joint employer status that aligns with the Department of Labor’s broad interpretation of joint employer status, and rejected the more narrow “economic realities” test used in other circuit courts.