Posts

November Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. Fourth Circuit: Back Pay Damages are Mandatory Under the ADEA
  2. California: Federal Department of Transportation Rules Preempts California Meal and Rest Period Requirements
  3. California: Announces Minimum Wage Rates for Certain Overtime Exemptions
  4. California: Cal/OSHA Revised Exposure for Citations and Issued Emergency Reporting Requirements
  5. California: PAGA May Not Apply to Construction Industry Employees Subject to Collective Bargaining Agreements
  6. New Jersey: Updates to Statewide Paid Sick Leave
  7. New York: Human Trafficking Informational Cards Required in Hotels
  8. New York: State Attorney General Releases FAQ on Non-Compete Agreements
  9. New York: Sexual Harassment Training Deadline Extended
  10. New York, NY: Revised FAQ for Paid Sick Leave Rules
  11. Pennsylvania: Illegal Sex Discrimination Interpreted to Include LGBT+ Components

Read more

Fourth Circuit: FLSA Lodging Credit Still Applies to Hours-Worked Agreements

APPLIES TO

All Employers of MD, NC, SC, VA, and WV Employees

EFFECTIVE

January 25, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The FLSA requires employees to be paid for all hours worked, and permits employers and employees to agree on the number of hours worked when the employee lives on the employer’s premises, provided that the FLSA’s wage and hour requirements are followed (e.g., minimum wage, overtime paid, etc.). In Balbed v. Eden Park Guest House, LLC, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that even when an employer and employee enter into a reasonable agreement of hours worked, the FLSA’s requirements for calculating the lodging credit are still enforceable.

Fourth Circuit: Unique Six Factor Test to Determine Joint Employer Status

APPLIES TO

All Employers with MD, NC, SC, VA and WV Employees

EFFECTIVE

January 25, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Salinas v. Commercial Interiors Inc., the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently established a unique six factor test for determining joint employer status that aligns with the Department of Labor’s broad interpretation of joint employer status, and rejected the more narrow “economic realities” test used in other circuit courts.