Posts

Seventh Circuit: ADA Reasonable Accommodation and Discrimination Claims Tempered by Employee Behavior

APPLIES TO

All Employers with IL, IN, and WI Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 23, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Graham v. Artic Zone Iceplex, LLC, a former employee claimed a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by the employer for (1) failure to provide reasonable accommodations of his disability, and (2) terminating him due to his disability. The Court explained that identifying a “reasonable accommodation” for an employee requires input from both employee and employer, and is a collaborative effort. This includes notice by the disabled employee to the employer if an accommodation provided does not meet the employee’s needs. If the employee fails to provide sufficient information in this regard, the employer cannot be held liable for failing to accommodate the employee.

Read more

Sixth Circuit: Work Restrictions Do Not Equate to a Disability Under the ADA

APPLIES TO

All Employers with MI, KY, OH, and TN Employees

EFFECTIVE

June 7, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Booth v. Nissan North America, Inc., the Sixth Circuit stated that just because an employee has physical work restrictions does not equate to being “disabled” under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A person is disabled under the ADA if they have a (1) “physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities,” (2) “a record of such impairment,” or (3) is “regarded as having such an impairment.”

Read more

New York, NY: New Reasonable Accommodation Requirements for Employers

APPLIES TO

All Employers with 4+ New York, NY Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 18, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On January 18, 2018, New York City passed Int. No. 804-A, which amends the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCHRL”) to require employers to engage in a “cooperative dialogue” to address an employee’s accommodation needs. Specifically, employers must engage in a cooperative dialogue within a reasonable time, upon request for a reasonable accommodation or when the employer has notice an employee may require an accommodation, related to religious needs; disability; pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition; or as a victim of domestic violence, sex offenses, or stalking.

A “cooperative dialogue” includes a good faith written or oral dialogue about a person’s accommodation needs, addressing the accommodation needs including alternatives to a requested accommodation, and the difficulties that potential accommodations may post for the employer. Once a final determination is reached after the cooperative dialogue process, an employer must provide the employee with a written final determination identifying any accommodation that was either granted or denied. Importantly, an employer cannot find that no reasonable accommodation is available without engaging in, or attempting to engage in, a cooperative dialogue.

Action Items

  1. Review the text of Int. No. 804-A here.
  2. Have policies and procedures reviewed and updated for compliance with this amendment by July 18, 2018 when the amendment becomes effective.
  3. Have managers and applicable personnel trained on the reasonable accommodation and cooperative dialogue process.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2018 ManagEase

Massachusetts: Employers Must Follow Disability Accommodation Rules for Employees Using Medical Marijuana

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Massachusetts Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 17, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently ruled that an employee may pursue a disability discrimination claim under state law against an employer for failure to accommodate the employee’s use of medical marijuana.  In Baruto v. Advantage Sales and Marking, LLC, the plaintiff was told after accepting an offer of employment that she needed to complete a successful drug test.  She informed her employer that she would fail the test due to medical marijuana use for Crohn’s disease. However, she agreed that she would not use marijuana before or during work. The plaintiff failed the drug test as predicted, and ultimately was terminated as a result based on federal law’s treatment of marijuana.

California: Voluntarily Resigning in an “Altered Mental State” is Not a Disability Protected from Discrimination

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

April 19, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Second District Court of Appeals in California recently determined that an employer’s refusal to allow an employee to rescind her own voluntary resignation is not a valid basis for a disability discrimination lawsuit, even though the employee allegedly tendered her resignation in an “altered mental state.”

California: DFEH Affirms “100% Healed” Policies Violate Employer’s Duty to Accommodate

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 14, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”) recently obtained a $290,000 settlement and reinstatement with reasonable accommodation on behalf of a high school custodian who was fired after sustaining an injury.  This settlement reinforces DFEH’s position that blanket policies requiring employees to be “100% healed” before they return to work violate the employer’s duty to reasonably accommodate an employee disability.

October Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This HR Alert addresses the following topics:
  1. New Process Speeds up Federal Whistleblower Complaints in the West
  2. EEOC Issues Guidance on Retaliation and Related Issues
  3. Eighth Circuit: Extension on FMLA Leave is not a Reasonable ADA Accommodation
  4. California: Court of Appeals Comments Again on “Associational” Disability Discrimination
  5. California: Continuing to Lead the Nation in Inclusive Restroom Laws
  6. California: Vehicle Code Amended to Re-Address Electronic Devices While Driving
  7. Berkeley, CA: Minimum Wage Increased October 1, 2016
  8. Morristown, NJ: Paid Sick Time Law Passed (and then Delayed)

Read more