Posts

California: Labor Commissioner Challenges Federal Preemption of Meal and Rest Break Rules

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employee Truck Drivers Subject to HOS Regulations

EFFECTIVE

February 6, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra recently announced that the California Labor Commissioner intended to challenge the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s (FMSCA) determination that federal hours of service (HOS) regulations preempt California meal and rest period regulations for property-carrying commercial vehicle drivers. Specifically, the FMSCA announced California meal and rest period regulations were incompatible with federal regulations, disrupted interstate commerce, did not offer any safety benefits beyond that already covered by federal law, and were overly burdensome and difficult to regulate. In response, on February 6th, the California Labor Commissioner filed a petition with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, requesting that the circuit court review and reverse the FMSCA determination.

Read more

California: Payroll Service Providers Not Liable for Payroll Violations

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 7, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Goonewardene v. ADP, Inc., the California Supreme Court recently stated that a third-party payroll service provider could not be held liable for errors the service made in issuing paychecks to employees of the company it provides service to.  There, an employee sued both her employer and ADP, its payroll processing service, for wage and hour violations, including failure to provide adequate documentation and records, wrongful termination, breach of contract, and negligence, among others.  The former employee argued that she was a third-party beneficiary of the contract between ADP and her employer, and that ADP had been negligent in providing payroll services for her benefit.

Read more

March Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. U.S. Supreme Court Reversed Ninth Circuit Equal Pay Ruling Based on Judge’s Death
  2. Fifth Circuit: Restated Its Position that Title VII Does Not Protect Sexual Orientation
  3. California: Guidance on New Agricultural Overtime Pay Requirements
  4. Alameda, CA: City Minimum Wage Increases to $13.50 in July, Regardless of Employer Size
  5. Florida: Miami Beach Minimum Wage Struck Down
  6. Illinois: $9.25 Minimum Wage by January 2020, With New Possible Penalties
  7. Minneapolis, MN: Minimum Wage Increase Approved
  8. New Jersey: $10 Minimum Wage in July 2019, $15 by 2024
  9. Westchester County, New York: Bans the Box
  10. Portland, Oregon: Prohibits Discrimination Against Atheists and Agnostics
  11. West Virginia: Federal Law Enforcement Pension Freed From State Taxes

Read more

California: IMPORTANT – Significant Changes to Reporting Time Pay

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

February 4, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc., the California Court of Appeal stated that employees required to call in two hours before a shift starts, to see whether or not they need to report to work, must be paid a minimum of two hours of work even if the employee is told they do not need to report for work.

Read more

February Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. REMINDER: Post Form 300A in the Workplace
  2. Upcoming Changes to H1-B Applications
  3. Recent OSHA Updates
  4. Department of Labor Penalty Increases
  5. California: Human Trafficking Required Posting Available; DE 2588 Form Updated
  6. California: Labor Commissioner Publishes Blacklisted Port Trucking Companies
  7. Daly City, CA: Minimum Wage Increases on February 13rd
  8. Fremont, CA: Minimum Wage Increases to $13.50 per Hour and Beyond
  9. Michigan: New Employee Protections for State Contractors and Workers
  10. Missouri: Delegation Clauses in Arbitration Agreements Must Be Enforced
  11. New Mexico: State Fair Pay for Women Act Applies to Public and Private Employers
  12. New York: Paid Family Leave Benefit Increases
  13. Ohio: Franchisors are Not Joint Employers
  14. Pennsylvania: Employers Must Protect Electronic Employee Information
  15. Philadelphia, PA: Minimum Wage Increases for City Workers and Contractors

Read more

California: New Laws Require Employee Training to Combat Human Trafficking

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees in the Hotel/
Motel and Light Rail/Bus Industries

EFFECTIVE

July 1, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Governor Jerry Brown recently approved SB 970 and AB 2034, two new laws that require employers in different industries to provide employee education and resources designed to combat human trafficking.

Read more

California: “Other Persons” Can Be Personally Liable for Civil Penalties for Wage & Hour Violations

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

September 28, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Atempa v. Pedrazzani, a California Court of Appeal stated that individual owners and officers of a Company can be held personally liable for wage and hour violations. Specifically, Labor Code Section 558 and 1197.1 state both the employer and any “other person” who cause wage and hour violations are subject to civil penalties. The lawsuit dated back to 2013 when two former employees sued their employer and the business owner for a variety of wage and hour violations, including unpaid overtime and minimum wage violations.

The court ultimately stated the Company and owner were each liable for civil penalties based on those wage and hour violations. The court reasoned that there did not need to be an “allegation or finding of either an alter ego relationship between the individual officer or agent and the corporate employer or acts by the individual officer or agent outside the scope of the agency for the corporate employer.” “Neither of these statutes mentions the business structure of the employer, the benefits or protections of the corporate form, or any potential reason or basis for disregarding the corporate form.”  The owner’s participation in the payment of wages in violation of the overtime pay and minimum wage laws were enough to qualify him as any “other person.”

The most important lesson from this case is that wage and hour violations expose an employer to civil penalties while simultaneously exposing individuals such as owners, officers, directors, or managers to personal liability for mishandled wage and hour compliance. Moreover, the court stated that private plaintiffs may pursue and collect these penalties for “aggrieved employees” from such “other persons” on behalf of the state of California through the Private Attorneys’ General Act (PAGA).

Action Items

  1. Have your management team trained on wage and hour compliance.
  2. Have an audit performed of your internal wage and hour practices.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2018 ManagEase

November Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. Fourth Circuit: Back Pay Damages are Mandatory Under the ADEA
  2. California: Federal Department of Transportation Rules Preempts California Meal and Rest Period Requirements
  3. California: Announces Minimum Wage Rates for Certain Overtime Exemptions
  4. California: Cal/OSHA Revised Exposure for Citations and Issued Emergency Reporting Requirements
  5. California: PAGA May Not Apply to Construction Industry Employees Subject to Collective Bargaining Agreements
  6. New Jersey: Updates to Statewide Paid Sick Leave
  7. New York: Human Trafficking Informational Cards Required in Hotels
  8. New York: State Attorney General Releases FAQ on Non-Compete Agreements
  9. New York: Sexual Harassment Training Deadline Extended
  10. New York, NY: Revised FAQ for Paid Sick Leave Rules
  11. Pennsylvania: Illegal Sex Discrimination Interpreted to Include LGBT+ Components

Read more

Ninth Circuit: California State Law Governs Employment Classification of Truck Drivers

APPLIES TO

Employers with CA Employees in the Motor Carrier Industry

EFFECTIVE

September 10, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In California Trucking Association v. Su, the Ninth Circuit stated that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA) did not preempt California’s Labor Commissioner from using a state common law test to determine whether truck drivers are misclassified as independent contractors, because the test used is not related to prices, routes, or services. There, the California Trucking Association (CTA) filed suit against the Labor Commissioner claiming that owner-operator truck drivers are independent contractors, and asked the court for a declaration that federal law preempted the Commissioner from using the state’s standard.

California: New Employment Laws Coming in 2019

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

January 1, 2019, unless noted otherwise

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Governor Brown recently signed numerous employment-related bills, impacting various industries and employment practices; among these are a package of bills following the #MeToo movement.  The below list summarizes some key bills.