California’s Small(er) Businesses Now Subject to Parental Bonding Leave

APPLIES TO

All Employers of 20-49 CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

January 1, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Last month, Governor Brown signed SB 63, which provides up to 12 weeks of unpaid parental bonding leave to employees of businesses with as a few as 20 employees.  This new leave follows similar eligibility requirements as the existing California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”), and may provide significant amounts of time off when combined with other available state and federal leaves.

Illinois: Responsible Job Creation Act Imposes New Requirements for Staffing Agencies

APPLIES TO

All Employers of IL Employees

EFFECTIVE

June 1, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Responsible Job Creation Act (the “Act”) creates new obligations for staff agencies, including the requirement to place temporary workers into permanent positions, new notice requirements regarding work placements, changes to itemized wage statements, and more.  The Act amends the Day and Temporary Labor Services Act and includes the following provisions:

Minnesota: Employers Cannot Fire Employees for Refusing to Share Tips

APPLIES TO

All Employers of MN Employees

EFFECTIVE

October 11, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Supreme Court of Minnesota recently affirmed that employers cannot terminate an employee for refusal or failing to share gratuities.  In Burt v. Rackner, Inc., a bartender was instructed to share a greater portion of his tips with bussing staff.  Upon his failure to do so, the bartender was terminated, and he filed a lawsuit for wrongful termination.

Minnesota: Non-Compete Agreements Require Additional Consideration Other than Continued Employment

APPLIES TO

All Employers of MN Employees

EFFECTIVE

October 6, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

On October 6, 2017, a Minnesota federal district court emphasized the importance of appropriately presenting restrictive covenants.  Minnesota employers who require employees to sign restrictive covenants, such as a non-compete agreement, have certain obligations to the timing and type of consideration that must be offered with the restrictive covenant.  Specifically, new applicants must be provided the non-compete agreement before accepting the offer of employment, and currently-employed individuals must be provided something of value beyond continued employment as consideration.

Washington: Healthy Start Act Requires Accommodation for Pregnant Employees, With or Without Disability

APPLIES TO

All Employers of 15+ WA Employees

EFFECTIVE

January 1, 2018

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Washington State’s Healthy Starts Act (the “Act”) requires covered employers to provide pregnant employees with reasonable accommodations.  In contrast to federal and other state anti-discrimination laws, some accommodations must be provided regardless of disability or medical certification, and regardless of whether such accommodations may cause the employer undue hardship.

The Act applies to employers of 15 or more Washington employees.  Key provisions of the Act are summarized below.

November Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. U.S. DOJ Reverses Obama-Era Stance on Transgender Workplace Protections
  2. IRS Releases 2017 Reporting Forms
  3. California: Bill Signed to Promote Fairness in Prop 65 Litigation
  4. New York: NYDOL Issues Emergency Regulation on In-Home Residential Care Worker Compensation
  5. New York City: City Issues Guidance on Salary Inquiry Prohibitions

Read more

Ninth Circuit: DOL’s 80/20 Tip Credit Rule is Invalid

APPLIES TO

All Employers of AK, AZ, CA, GA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA Employees

EFFECTIVE

September 6, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Department of Labor (“DOL”) permits employers to give a tip credit to tipped employees who spend no more than 20% of their time performing non-tipped duties. In Marsh v. J. Alexander’s, LLC, the Ninth Circuit noted that this rule is only found in the Field Operations Handbook used by the DOL as guidance for investigations by field officers, rather than in a statute or regulation; as a result, the court stated it was not valid.

Seventh Circuit: Additional Months of Leave after FMLA not a Reasonable Accommodation

APPLIES TO

All Employers of IL, IN, WI Employees

EFFECTIVE

September 20, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Employers may already know that certain types of leaves of absence may qualify as a reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).  However, the Seventh Circuit recently confirmed that an employee’s request to take additional months of leave after exhausting his FMLA allotment was not a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.

California: New Law Imposes Pay Data Reporting Requirements on Large Employers

APPLIES TO

All Employers of 500+ CA Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 1, 2019

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

UPDATE (10/23/17) – Although passed by the California State Legislature, this law was not signed by Governor Brown and therefore did not go into effect. Look for additional updates on this topic. 

While the Trump Administration has indefinitely blocked implementation of the EEO-1 form section that would have required reporting employee pay data, California has gone a step further in requiring employers to report information about gender wage differentials.  Effective July 1, 2019 and biennially thereafter, Labor Code Section 2810.6 will require employers of 500 or more CA employees to collect and report specific demographic and wage disparity information.

Connecticut: Overtime for a Fluctuating Work Week Schedule is Calculated Based on State Law

APPLIES TO

All Employers with CT Employees

EFFECTIVE

August 17, 2017

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

In Williams v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc., the Connecticut Supreme Court recently stated that employers must calculate overtime for a fluctuating work week (“FWW”) schedule based on state, rather than federal, overtime rules.

There, GNC followed federal rules and divided the employees’ weekly pay by the actual number of hours the employees worked in that week to determine the employees’ regular rate of pay. However, the court stated that Connecticut requires employers to divide weekly pay by the number of hours the employees usually work each week, rather than actual hours.  In following the federal model, the GNC employees would always work over 40 actual hours per week when overtime is involved.  Thus, the number of actual hours would be greater than the usual hours worked, and the resulting calculation for the regular rate of pay would always be lower than if the usual hours were used to calculate rates.

Connecticut employers with FWW schedules should review overtime calculation methods to ensure compliance with the recent ruling.

Action Items

  1. Read the text of Connecticut Supreme Court’s opinion here.
  2. Review overtime calculations for compliance with state overtime rules.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2017 ManagEase, Incorporated.