In O’Daniel v. Industrial Service Solutions, the 5^th Circuit Court of Appeal reaffirmed its position that sexual orientation is not a protected class under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, including heterosexual orientation. Specifically, “’[s]ex’ discrimination has been held to encompass discrimination based on sexual harassment or sexual stereotyping,” but does not include sexual orientation.

There, an HR manager posted to her personal Facebook account a picture of a man in a dress shopping at Target and objecting to his ability to use female facilities with the employee’s daughters. When her supervisors, one of whom is a member of the LGBTQ community, became aware of the post, they attempted to terminate her employment, but ultimately disciplined her. Subsequently, the employee claimed, in part, she was subject to discrimination and retaliation by her supervisor following the Facebook post, because she was heterosexual and she opposed discrimination on the basis of her heterosexual orientation.

The court stated that because sexual orientation is not protected under Title VII, opposing her alleged discriminatory treatment as a heterosexual was not a protected activity.