Minnesota: New Ban on Noncompete Agreements

APPLIES TO

All Employers with MN Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 1, 2023

  

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Noncompete provisions are prohibited for employees and independent contractors, except in the context of a business sale or dissolution.
  • Non-Minnesota choice of law, forum, and venue provisions are prohibited in all agreements with employees and independent contractors.

Discussion

Minnesota now has a near total ban on noncompete agreements. SF 3035 prohibits employers from requiring employees or independent contractors to sign noncompete agreements as of July 1st, which include terms that would restrict them post-termination from performing work for another employer for a specified period of time, in a specified geographical area, or in a capacity that is similar to the individual’s work for the employer. Employees and independent contractors may recover attorneys’ fees for enforcing their rights under the law. Notably, agreements that violate these rules will still be enforceable, but without the offending provisions.

Noncompete provisions are still permitted in the sale or dissolution of a business as long as key individuals agree to it, the terms are temporary, and the terms are limited to a reasonable geographic area and for a reasonable length of time. The noncompete ban does not include nondisclosure agreements, protections of trade secrets or confidential information, non-solicitation agreements, or restrictions on the use of client or contact lists or to solicit customers following termination.

Separately, the bill also prohibits employers from requiring employees and independent contractors who primarily reside in Minnesota, as a condition of employment, to agree to provisions that would require them to litigate or arbitrate claims outside of Minnesota or be subject to laws outside of Minnesota.

Action Items

  1. Review the bill here.
  2. Have agreements with noncompete provisions prepared by legal counsel.
  3. Review agreements with employees and independent contractors for non-Minnesota choice of law, forum, and venue provisions.
  4. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2023 ManagEase

Minnesota: Pregnancy and Parenting Leave Act Expanded

APPLIES TO

All Employers with MN Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 1, 2023

  

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • The Pregnancy and Parenting Leave Act now applies to employers with one or more employees.
  • There are expanded protections for lactation and pregnancy accommodation requirements.
  • Employers must provide employees with a notice of rights under the Act.
  • If employers have an employee handbook, they must also include notice of employee rights and remedies under the Act.

Discussion

SF 3035 expanded employee rights and protections under the Pregnancy and Parenting Leave Act. Specifically, the Act now applies to employers with one or more employees (previously 21 or more employees). Employers are also now prohibited from discharging, disciplining, penalizing, interfering with, threatening, restraining, coercing, or otherwise retaliating or discriminating against an employee for requesting or taking leave under the Act or asserting their rights or remedies under the Act.

Lactation accommodations were also expanded. Employees must be provided break time to express milk, without regard to the age or parentage of the child. Break times “may” run concurrently with other break periods already provided but are not required to. Additionally, language permitting an employer exemption for undue disruption to the employer’s operations was removed. Employers are now simply obligated to provide the required break time. Further, the lactation location must be “clean, private, and secure,” and still cannot be a bathroom.

There are also expanded pregnancy accommodations. Pregnant employees may now be given longer breaks upon request without being required to provide a doctor’s note. Reasonable accommodations were expanded to include a temporary leave of absence, modification in work schedule or job assignments, and more frequent or longer break periods.

There is also a new notice requirement. Specifically, employers must inform employees of their rights under the Act at the time of hire and when an employee makes an inquiry about or requests parental leave. Information must be provided in English and the primary language of the employee. If an employer provides an employee handbook, it must include notice of employee rights and remedies under the Act.

Action Items

  1. Have lactation and pregnancy accommodation policies and procedures updated.
  2. Review pregnancy and parent leave policies for updates.
  3. Implement a required notice of rights when available from the state Department of Labor.
  4. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2023 ManagEase

New Jersey: Employees Do Not Have a Right to Sue Employers Under Cannabis Law

APPLIES TO

All Employers with NJ Employees

EFFECTIVE

May 25, 2023

  

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • The New Jersey District Court ruled that only the state’s Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC), and not private citizens, has the authority to enforce the Cannabis Regulatory, Enforcement Assistance, and Marketplace Modernization Act (CREAMMA).
  • CREAMMA prevents employers from taking any adverse employment action based on a positive drug test alone.

Discussion

In Zanetich v. Wal-mart Stores East, the New Jersey District Court ruled that only the state’s Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC), and not private citizens, has the authority to enforce the Cannabis Regulatory, Enforcement Assistance, and Marketplace Modernization Act (CREAMMA). CREAMMA prevents employers from taking any adverse employment action based on a positive drug test alone. This means employees and applicants do not have a private right of action of adverse employment actions based on positive drug tests alone, only the CRC does.

Here, the plaintiff applied for a job at a Wal-Mart and received an offer subject to the successful completion of a drug test. The drug test revealed marijuana in the person’s system, and Wal-Mart rescinded the job offer. The plaintiff filed a class-action lawsuit alleging a violation of CREAMMA and failure to hire in violation of New Jersey public policy. The plaintiff argued that although CREAMMA’s text does not explicitly include a private cause of action, the New Jersey’s legislature created an implied cause of action when it enacted the law. In addition, New Jersey’s common law claim for wrongful termination also applies to applicants’ claims arising from a failure to hire.

The court disagreed on both claims. The court found there was no evidence of legislative intent to provide an implied private cause of action when an explicit right was not created. Well-settled case law also showed that there is no cause of action under common law for failure to hire. The court did however call on the state legislature to amend the statute to clearly indicate an intent to create a private cause of action, because its decision left the plaintiff without a remedy and rendered the language of the employment protections in the statute “meaningless.” This case is being appealed so stay tuned for additional updates.

Action Items

  1. Consult with legal counsel prior to taking adverse employment actions under CREAMMA.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on the requirements.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2023 ManagEase

New Jersey: Definition of “Disabled” Limited

APPLIES TO

All Employers with NJ Employees

EFFECTIVE

June 7, 2023

  

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Mild, transitory illnesses may not qualify as a protected disability or perceived disability.

Discussion

In Guzman v. M. Teixeira International, Inc., the New Jersey Appellate Division stated that a perceived mild case of COVID-19 did not rise to the level of a “disability” within the meaning of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD). Generally, “disability” under the NJLAD is a disability caused by bodily injury, birth defect, or illness resulting from anatomical, psychological, physiological, or neurological conditions which prevents the typical exercise of any bodily or mental functions or is demonstrable by accepted clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques.

Here, an employee said he felt “cold, clammy, and weak.” His employer asked him to work the rest of the shift, which he did. That evening, the employer said he could not return to work until he had a negative COVID-19 test result. The next day, after taking the test, he told the employer that he was feeling better. Before he was able to get the results of the COVID-19 test, he was terminated because he had COVID-19 symptoms and could not provide a negative test result. The employee claimed he was discriminated against for having a perceived disability.

Ultimately, the court said that the perception of the employee’s illness did not rise to the level of a disability, noting the mild symptoms and lack of medical treatment. “Not every illness will constitute a disability under the LAD.” The court emphasized that this is a case-specific situation and that different circumstances may have a different result depending on the extent and severity of the illness.

Action Items

  1. Review potential terminations of employees with potentially disabling medical conditions with legal counsel.
  2. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2023 ManagEase

Oregon: Increased Oregon OSHA Penalty Maximums

APPLIES TO

All Employers with OR Employees

EFFECTIVE

May 24, 2023

  

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Oregon OSHA increased its civil penalties for health and safety violations and for repeat offenders.
  • The Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services has expanded authority to conduct a comprehensive inspection at any place of employment based on a business’ history of violating state occupational safety and health laws.

Discussion

SB 592 increased civil penalties and expanded the scope of workplace safety investigations by Oregon’s Occupational Safety and Health Division (Oregon OSHA). Non-serious violations may incur civil penalties of up to $15,625 per violation. Serious violations, defined as those posing a significant likelihood of death or severe physical harm, will result in civil penalties ranging from $1,116 to $15,625 per violation. Serious violations causing or contributing to an employee’s death will receive civil penalties ranging from $20,000 to $50,000 per violation. Repeat offenders will also receive stronger penalties. Willful or repeated violations will incur civil penalties ranging from $11,162 to $156,259 per violation. Willful or repeated violations causing or contributing to an employee’s death will receive a minimum civil penalty of $50,000 per violation, with a maximum penalty of $250,000. Failure to rectify a violation, as cited by Oregon OSHA, may result in penalties of up to $15,625 per day of continued violation.

The law also expanded inspection authority for the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) to conduct a comprehensive inspection at any place of employment based on a business’ history of violating state occupational safety and health laws. There are two circumstances in which a comprehensive inspection will be conducted: 1) whenever an accident investigation reveals that a violation has caused or contributed to a work-related fatality, a comprehensive inspection must be carried out within one year of the associated closing conference; and 2) if three or more willful or repeated violations occur within a one-year period, a comprehensive inspection must be conducted within one year of the most recent willful or repeated violation’s associated closing conference. The DCBS must also submit an annual report summarizing the total number and amount of penalties imposed, the overall number of appeals filed, and the complete scope of inspections conducted, including the circumstances that prompted such inspections.

Action Items

  1. Review and update health and safety programs.
  2. Have appropriate personnel trained on the requirements.
  3. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2023 ManagEase

Rhode Island: Recent Legislative Updates

APPLIES TO

Employers with RI Employees

EFFECTIVE

As Indicated

  

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Employers will face criminal liability when knowingly and willfully failing to pay wages of $1,500 or more on an employee’s regular pay day, at the time of termination, or to a deceased employee.
  • Rhode Island will apply the FLSA test to determine independent contractor status. Employers who knowingly and willfully misclassify an employee as an independent contractor under this test may face criminal prosecution and increased civil penalties.
  • Beginning January 1, 2024, independent contractors must file Form DWC-11 on an annual basis.
  • It is an unlawful employment practice for employers to require employees to sign non-disclosure agreements or non-disparagement agreements that seek to conceal or keep confidential alleged violations of civil rights.
  • June 19th is known as “Juneteenth National Freedom Day,” and has been designated as a recognized state holiday.

Discussion

On June 16, 2023, the Rhode Island General Assembly concluded its 2023 legislative session, resulting in several new employment-related laws that expand employee protections. The changes are summarized below.

Increased Criminal and Civil Penalties for Wage Violations and Employee Misclassification. Under SB 1079, and beginning January 1, 2024, any employer who knowingly and willfully fails to pay wages of $1,500 or more on an employee’s regular pay day or at the time of termination will face criminal liability. Similar liability will be imposed on an employer who fails to pay wages of $1,500 or more owed to a deceased employee. Upon a plea or conviction under the new law, employers will face potential imprisonment for a term of up to three (3) years, a fine of up to $5,000, or both.

Additionally, beginning on January 1, 2024, employers should apply the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) test to determine independent contractor versus employee status. The Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training (DLT) will review employee misclassification complaints using the FLSA test, and if the DLT finds that an employer has knowingly and willfully misclassified an employee as an independent contractor, the DLT will be directed to refer the matter to the Office of the Attorney General for potential criminal prosecution. Employers who knowingly and willfully misclassify employees under the new FLSA test will be liable for civil penalties ranging from $1,500 to $3,000 for a first offense and up to $5,000 for each misclassified employee for any second and subsequent offense.

The new legislation presents a focus on the Rhode Island construction industry, specifying that any “construction industry” employer that knowingly and willfully misclassifies an employee as an independent contractor will be guilty of a misdemeanor if the value of the employee’s services is less than $1,500, or a felony if the value of their services is more than $1,500. If the employer did not make its classification decision knowingly and willfully, the employer will be liable for a civil penalty of $1,500 to $3,000 per misclassified employee.

Independent Contractor Annual Registration. Under current law, independent contractors in Rhode Island are required to file a form with the DLT (i.e., Form DWC-11), reaffirming that the independent contractor is not an employee of the hiring entity and is not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits from the hiring entity. Under HB 5710, independent contractors will be required to file the Form DWC-11 electronically on an annual basis. The new annual registration requirements will take effect on January 1, 2024.

Restrictions on Non-Disclosure and Non-Disparagement Agreements. Effective June 21, 2023, SB 342 states that employers cannot require an employee, as a condition of their employment, to execute a non-disclosure agreement seeking to conceal alleged violations of civil rights. Additionally, it is an unlawful employment practice to proffer to an employee a non-disparagement agreement concerning alleged violations of civil rights or any agreement that requires alleged violations of civil rights to remain confidential. Any contract provision in violation of the new law will be void and unenforceable.

Juneteenth as a State Holiday. Governor McKee signed HB 5380, designating June 19th as “Juneteenth National Freedom Day,” requiring employers to pay employees classified as non-exempt at the holiday premium rate for all hours worked on this new state holiday. Employers cannot impose disciplinary action if a non-exempt employee refuses to work on the recognized Juneteenth holiday.

Action Items

  1. Review wage payment procedures to ensure compliance with requirements.
  2. Have independent contractor status reviewed by legal counsel.
  3. Review applicable nondisclosure and non-disparagement agreements with legal counsel.
  4. Review and update policies to account for recognition of June 19th as a state holiday.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2023 ManagEase

July Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

2022 EEO-1 Reporting Delayed to Fall 2023

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has delayed opening the reporting period for EEO-1 Component 1 data to the fall of 2023. The EEOC’s website says they are currently completing a mandatory, three-year renewal of the EEO-1 Component 1 data collection by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Continue to look for updates on the status of the reporting period.

CMS Withdraws Vaccine Mandate

Effective August 4, 2023, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will end its mandatory COVID-19 vaccination requirement for healthcare workers. A final rule published on June 5, 2023 unwinds several aspects of the interim rule released at the start of the public health emergency. Healthcare workers regulated by CMS will no longer have to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19. The final rule also removes COVID-19 testing requirements. However, healthcare providers must continue to educate and offer COVID-19 vaccinations to staff and residents. CMS also intends to promote COVID-19 vaccinations through quality reporting and value-based incentive programs. CMS-covered healthcare facilities should review and revise their vaccination and testing policies as necessary.

DOL Provides Additional Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Resources

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) went into effect on June 27, 2023. The EEOC released additional resources for employees and employers including tips for workers to request accommodations, a “Know Your Rights” video series, and a revised “Know Your Rights” poster required to be posted in most workplaces. Previously released resources include a Q&A on “What You Should Know about the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act,” an infographic for employers, and an informational poster about the PWFA for healthcare providers’ offices. Employers should review and update their processes for providing reasonable accommodations to pregnant workers and distribute required postings.

NLRA Does Not Protect Employee Damage to Employer Property During Strikes

On June 1, 2023, in Glacier Northwest v. Teamsters, the United States Supreme Court stated that National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)  does not preempt “an employer’s state tort claim against a union for property damage that allegedly occurred because workers failed to take reasonable precautions to protect the employer’s property before going on strike.” There, striking workers abandoned trucks full of freshly poured concrete, causing the employer to incur costs to urgently and properly dispose of the concrete before it hardened in the trucks. The Court said that strikers may be liable for economic damage they cause to employer property if they fail to take reasonable precautions to avoid foreseeable and imminent danger. The NLRA does not protect affirmative steps taken to endanger an employer’s property.

New FMCSA Return-to-Duty Resource

A driver with a drug and alcohol program violation is prohibited from performing safety-sensitive functions, e.g., driving, for any DOT-regulated employer until the return-to-duty process is complete. Beginning November 18, 2024, as part of new Federal regulations, drivers with a “prohibited” status in FMCSA’s Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse will be denied or lose their State-issued commercial driving privileges. FMCSA recently added a new visor card resource to the Clearinghouse Learning Center that outlines the RTD process that drivers with a “prohibited” Clearinghouse status must complete so they can get their status back to “not prohibited.”

California: Enforcement of CPRA Delayed

Enforcement of the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) regulations has been delayed until March 29, 2024. The regulations were set to be enforced beginning on July 1, 2023. The CPRA regulations detail how businesses must comply with the requirements of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) which creates specific rights for California consumers when it comes to the collection, processing, sharing, and sale of their personal information and sensitive personal information. The CPRA’s requirements also extend to the personal information of employees who are California residents. The California Chamber of Commerce sought to delay enforcement of the CPRA until one year after the final regulations were published, and a Sacramento Superior Court agreed by granting an injunction and delaying enforcement. While businesses now have an additional nine months to bring their practices into compliance, the regulations are quite complex. Businesses should use this time to identify how they collect and use personal information, how it is stored, and what they do with it.

California: COVID-19 Paid Sick Leave Relief Grant Program

Eligible California small businesses may now apply for a state program that awards $5,000 to $50,000 for costs incurred from California’s COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave provided between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022. Employers should review eligibility restrictions and the list of documents required to apply for this program on the program’s website. Note that available funds are limited, so small businesses should timely review their eligibility to determine whether they are able to participate.

California: Updated Definition of COVID-19 “Outbreak”

On June 20, 2023, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) updated its COVID-19 public health order and guidance, changing the definition of “outbreak” in non-health care settings to be “at least three COVID-19 cases within an exposed group during a seven-day period.” This new definition aligns with similar changes to the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists’ (CSTE) outbreak definition. Employers should update their Illness and Injury Prevention Programs as the new definition impacts testing, recordkeeping, and face covering requirements.

Irvine, CA: Hotel Worker Protections in Effect

As of May 21, 2023, certain aspects of Irvine’s Hotel Worker Protection Ordinance have gone into effect. Specifically, hotels must limit workloads for room attendants based on square footage, implement maximum room cleaning quotas based on hotel size, and comply with recordkeeping requirements. The Ordinance applies to all Irvine hotels, except for those with fewer than 45 guest rooms or who have obtained a hardship waiver from the City. Hotel employers should review the Ordinance and update procedures for compliance.

Florida: Safety in Private Spaces Act Affects Public Employers

As of July 1, 2023, Florida’s Safety in Private Spaces Act requires public employers to establish disciplinary procedures for employees who willfully enter restrooms or changing facilities in public buildings that differ from the gender category they were assigned at birth and refuse to depart when asked by administrative personnel. Employees will not be subject to criminal trespass charges for violating the Act. However, they will be subject to the new disciplinary procedures established by the public employer as a result of the Act. The Act does not impact private employers or other private businesses that open their doors to the public (like restaurants, hotels, or retail establishments). Public employers subject to the Act should review and revise their current disciplinary procedures to ensure compliance.

Hawaii: Enhanced Restrictions on Carrying Firearms

As of July 1, 2023, Hawaii has amended its firearms law to modify the restrictions on a person who may carry a firearm, which extend to the workplace. In addition to prohibiting firearms in several public places, the law provides that private entities, including employers, must provide express authorization to allow the public to carry firearms on their premises. The law also requires firearms to be secured inside unattended vehicles and provides certain exemptions for carrying a firearm in otherwise restricted areas. Employers should review and revise their current workplace security policies and procedures to ensure compliance with Hawaii’s enhanced restrictions on firearms.

Evanston, IL: Fair Workweek Ordinance

Effective September 1, 2023, the Evanston Fair Workweek Ordinance requires employers with more than 100 employees in the hospitality, food service, retail, warehouse services, building services, and manufacturing industries to provide a written good-faith estimate of work schedules at least 14 calendar days in advance and premium pay for any changes. Premium pay is one additional hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate of pay for the number of hours in the employee’s scheduled shift or four hours whenever hours are cancelled or reduced, whichever is less. One hour of predictability pay is required for all other changes and is calculated at the same rate. Covered employers also cannot hire new employees until after they have offered additional work hours and shifts to current employees. Employees will also be able to request certain work hours, work times, or locations of work, but employers have the right to accept or deny the request in writing within 3 days. Employers are also required to give employees at least 11 hours of rest between shifts unless written consent from the employee agrees to the scheduling of a shift that begins less than 11 hours after the previous shifts. Since the effective date is less than two months away, employers should review the requirements of the ordinance to begin implementing the changes now.

St. Paul, MN: Earned Sick and Safe Time Update

Amendments to St. Paul’s paid sick leave administrative rules took effect on June 24, 2023. The amendments now align with recent amendments to the Earned Sick and Safe Time (ESST) ordinance. Among the updates: 1) “independent contractor” has the same meaning as in the Labor and Industry Chapters of the Minnesota statutes; 2) “year” has been defined as a regular and consecutive 12-month period, either calendar, fiscal, reporting year, or based on the date employee commenced employment, as determined by an employer and clearly communicated, verbally or in writing, to each employee of that employer; 3) temporary workers are now covered by the law; 4) methods for accrual and treatment of carryover are now included in the administrative rules; 5) if a business is sold or acquired by another business, all accrued sick time is retained and used regardless of where the successor employer is headquartered; and 6) documentation may be requested where when an employee uses ESST for more than three consecutive days. Employers should revise their sick leave policies to reflect the updates.

Montana: Independent Contractor Status Determination

Effective October 1, 2023, SB 22 will amend Montana’s Workers’ Compensation Act to establish a rebuttable presumption that a person without an independent contractor exemption certificate is still an independent contractor when: (i) the person represents to a hiring entity or individual in writing that they have an independent contractor exemption certificate; (ii) the person provides the hiring entity or individual a forged or otherwise fraudulent independent contractor exemption certificate; or (iii) the person’s independent contractor exemption certificate expires while the person is working.

Montana: Increased Penalties for Failure to File W-2s

Effective May 22, 2023, SB 303 increased penalties for employers who fail to file a Form W-2 with the state Department of Revenue (DOR) from $5 to $50 for each failure and from $50 to $250 for the minimum penalty. The DOR will waive the employer’s first penalty for failing to file Form W-2 if the employer files the form within 30 days of the DOR’s late notice. Otherwise, the DOR will only waive the penalty if the employer submits the form within 15 calendar days of the due date of the form or demonstrates to the DOR that it had reasonable cause for the failure.

Nevada: Public Accommodations COVID-19 Leave Ends

As of May 17, 2023, the Public Accommodations COVID-19 leave ended. SB 441 repealed the legislation requiring a “public accommodation facility” (i.e., a hotel and casino, resort, hotel, motel, hostel, bed and breakfast facility or other facility offering rooms or areas to the public for monetary compensation or other financial consideration on an hourly, daily, or weekly basis) to provide paid time off for employees experiencing COVID-19 symptoms or who had been exposed to COVID-19.

New Jersey: Required Registration for Employers Hiring Minors

Effective June 1, 2023, employers who hire minors in New Jersey must register themselves with the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development. The registration must include: 1) the name of the employer; 2) the email address of the employer; 3) the location of the business operations including where the minor will be working; 4) the number and names of minors whom the employer has hired or expects to hire; and 5) a certified statement that the employer is employing minors only in positions permitted by law in order to protect the health, safety, and well-being of minors. Any time there is a change to the position of a minor, the employer must update the registration.

New Jersey: Major Changes to Unemployment Compensation Law

Some major changes to New Jersey’s Unemployment Compensation Law (UCL) go into effect on July 31, 2023. First, employers will be required to notify the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (NJDOL) each time an employer discharges an employee. The NJDOL will create a new form for employers to submit electronically that includes specific information that the NJDOL needs to make a benefit determination. Second, employers will need to send a copy of Form BC-10 to NJDOL. Previously, this form was only provided to separated employees. Third, deadlines related to the unemployment benefits process, including obtaining information from employers about the separation, have been shortened so there is additional pressure on employers to comply with the law’s requirements. Failing to provide the required separation information will lead to increased fines – a jump from $25 to $500 for every ten days of delay to provide information. An overpayment of unemployment benefits due to an employer’s failure to provide separation information also means the separated employee is not liable for the repayment. Employers should review the forms and their requirements prior to the effective date.

New York: Repeal of Healthcare Worker COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

As of May 24, 2023, the New York State Department of Health (DOH) has begun the process to repeal the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthcare workers. With the end of the public health emergency, the DOH noted that the vaccine recommendations are evolving. It is now up to the Public Health and Planning Council (PHHPC) to approve the repeal. That approval is still pending from the PHHPC. In anticipation of the approval, the Department has stated that it will no longer cite providers for failing to comply with the vaccine requirement. Healthcare facilities are still permitted to individually implement their own internal policies regarding COVID-19 vaccination in compliance with applicable state and federal law. Employers should continue to monitor the Department’s website for updates so they can update their vaccine policies as required.

New York City, NY: Minimum Wage for App-Based Restaurant Delivery Workers

The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has set a minimum pay rate for app-based restaurant delivery workers. The pay rate will be $17.96 when it takes effect on July 12, 2023 and will increase to $19.96 when it is fully phased-in on April 1, 2025. The rate will also be adjusted annually for inflation. Apps can develop their own formulas (e.g., pay per trip or per hour worked) as long workers make the minimum pay rate of $19.96 on average. Additionally, apps that pay workers for all the time a worker is connected to the app must pay at least $17.96 per hour in 2023, which is approximately $0.30 per minute, not including tips. Apps that only pay for trip time must pay at least approximately $0.50 per minute of trip time in 2023, not including tips. The DCWP will be educating app-based restaurant delivery workers on the new pay rate and their rights under the law.

Oregon: Increase in Exempt Salary Threshold

Effective July 1, 2023, the minimum weekly salary level for exempt executive, administrative, and professional employees is $618.00 in the Portland area, $568.00 in nonrural counties, and $528.00 in rural counties. Employers should note that the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires a minimum salary of $684 per week. Therefore, employers covered by the FLSA must pay $684 per week in order to maintain their overtime exemption.

Oregon: New Hire Reporting of Independent Contractors

SB 184 requires businesses to report independent contractors to the Oregon Department of Justice, Division of Child Support (ODCS) effective January 1, 2024. Within the first 20 days, a business must report the independent contractor if they are expected to perform services for the employer for more than 20 days or are rehired by the same employer and have not performed services for that employer in the past 60 days. Businesses must submit a copy of the independent contractor’s W-9, W-4, or other ODCS-approved equivalent form as long as it includes the employer’s name, address, federal tax ID number, and the independent contractor’s name, address, Social Security number, and the date of their first day of work.

Texas: Amended TCHRA Prohibits Hairstyle Discrimination

Effective September 1, 2023, Texas’s CROWN Act will amend the definition of racial discrimination under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA) to include discrimination based on hair textures or protective hairstyles commonly or historically associated with race. The TCHRA applies to employers with 15 or more employees, and “protective hairstyles” has been defined to include braids, twists, and locks. Employers should review and update their workplace polices to account for this expanded definition.

Washington: Production Quota Protections for Warehouse Employees

Effective July 1, 2024, HB 1762 targets warehouse distribution centers and provides protections to warehouse workers subject to production quotas. A warehouse distribution center is defined using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes and applies to employers that hire at least 100 workers in a single location or 1,000 warehouse workers in Washington state in total. Warehouse staffing agencies are also covered. Employers who use production quotas in these facilities to require workers to perform at a specific speed, to complete a specific number of tasks, handle or produce a quantified amount of material within a certain time period, or categorize their time between performing tasks and not performing tasks must consider specific factors when setting a quota. These factors include: 1) time for rest breaks; 2) reasonable time to travel to designated locations for rest breaks; 3) reasonable time to travel to on-site designated meal break locations; 4) time to use the restroom, including travel time to the restroom; 5) time to perform any other activities required by the employer that are not covered by the quota; and 6) time to take any action necessary to maintain health and safety standards.

Employers must provide warehouse workers with written notice and a description of the productivity goals, the consequences of failing to meet those goals, and any incentives or bonus programs associated with meeting or exceeding the quota. The notice must be in plain language and in the employee’s preferred language. Employees also have the right to request: a written description of each quota to which the employee is subject; a copy of the employee’s own personal work speed data for the prior six months; and a copy of the prior six months of aggregated work speed data for similar employees at the same warehouse distribution center. Employees are also protected from adverse actions after they request records, complain to the employer about the quotas, or file a claim. The law has additional requirements beyond these few major points. Employers should begin reviewing their policies and practices now in addition to creating a recordkeeping system to comply with the extensive requirements.

Washington: Military Spouses Can Terminate Employment Contracts

Effective July 23, 2023, HB 1009 permits military spouses to terminate employment contracts. The law’s goal is to help military spouses who face employment challenges due to changes in the location of their spouse’s deployment. The law allows the spouse of a service member to terminate an employment contract without penalty if the service member received orders for a permanent change of duty station. In order to take advantage of this law, the military spouse must provide the employer with written notification of the termination and proof of the orders.

Washington: Required Reporting of Lump-Sum Payments for Child Support

Effective July 23, 2023, HB 1262 requires employers to report lump-sum payments for child support purposes. A lump-sum is income exclusive of periodic recurring payments of earnings on regular paydays or reimbursement of expenses. Examples include, but are not limited to, bonuses, commissions, merit increase, and severance pay. Employers must withhold the amount stated in an income withholding order unless a portion of the lump-sum payment is disposable earnings. An employer that receives an income withholding order that includes a provision for payment toward child support arrears must notify the Washington Division of Child Support (DCS) or the U.S. Office of Child Support Services before making any lump-sum payment of more than $500. DCS will respond to the employer within 14 calendar days and either allow some or all of the lump-sum payment to be distributed or provide an amended or supplemental income withholding order specifying the amount of the lump-sum payment to be remitted to DCS. Employers should update their payroll processes to reflect the new requirements.

Washington: Amendments to FFML and Cares Fund Quarterly Reporting Requirements

Washington updated its quarterly reporting requirements for both Paid Family and Medical Leave and the Washington Cares Fund programs. Effective July 1, 2023, if an employer has no paid wages to report for a calendar quarter, then a report of “no payroll” must be filed. This continues for a maximum of eight consecutive calendar quarters unless the employer notifies the ESD sooner that they do not have any employees to report at that time and in the foreseeable future. The quarterly reports also have to include employees’ date of birth. Employers should update their payroll and reporting processes should reflect the new requirements.

West Virginia: Distracted Driving Prohibitions Are Expanded

As of June 9, 2023, the Electronically Distracted Driving Act expands West Virginia’s prohibitions on driving while using a wireless communication device or stand-alone electronic device. These include, but are not limited to, cellular phones, portable telephones, text messaging devices, personal digital assistants, stand-alone computers (e.g., tablets, laptops, or netbook computers), GPS receivers, or other substantially similar portable wireless devices that are used to initiate or receive communication, information, or other data. Drivers must exercise due care in operating motor vehicles and, with limited exceptions, may not engage in certain specified actions involving these electronic devices that may distract them from the safe operation of the vehicle. To the extent that employees are required to drive for work or are provided with an employer-provided vehicle, employers should review and update their workplace safety policies and procedures to ensure compliance with West Virginia’s expanded prohibitions on distracted driving.


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2023 ManagEase