South Carolina: New Lactation Break Requirements

APPLIES TO

All Employers with SC Employees

EFFECTIVE

August 24, 2020

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The South Carolina Lactation Support Act (the “Act”) requires employers in South Carolina to make reasonable efforts to provide employees time and space to express breast milk for a one-year period following a nursing child’s birth.  The Act brings South Carolina’s local law in alignment with federal requirements to provide lactation accommodations, with some minor differences.

Employers must provide both exempt and non-exempt employees reasonable break time to express milk, or allow employees to utilize existing paid break or mealtime to do so.  Where possible, lactation breaks should run concurrently with existing employer-provided break time.  Employers are also responsible for providing a private location for a lactating employee’s use.  The Act clarifies that employers need not build a separate room, but the private location cannot be a toilet stall and should be in close proximity to the lactating employee’s work area.  Employers may be exempt from providing lactation breaks if doing so would cause an unreasonable burden.

Action Items

  1. Review the FAQ here.
  2. Train supervisory staff on addressing requests for lactation breaks or accommodations from employees.
  3. Review handbook and written policy documents for compliance with the Act.
  4. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2020 ManagEase

Virginia: NEW COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard

APPLIES TO

All Employers with VA Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 27, 2020

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Virginia is the first state in the country to implement an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for managing COVID-19. It went into effect on July 27, 2020. Employers must assess the “exposure risk level” of disease-related hazards in the workplace defined as “very high,” “high,” “medium,” and “lower,” and the top three classifications must implement an infectious disease preparedness and response plan. Employers who comply with (unidentified) CDC publications to mitigate COVID-19 related risks are deemed to have complied with the ETS. All employers must also:

  • Tell employees how to self-monitor for symptoms;
  • Implement policies and procedures for employees to report COVID-19 symptoms;
  • Prohibit infected or exposed employees from reporting to a worksite (other than a remote work arrangement) or client location;
  • Make employees aware of sick leave policies;
  • Implement specified confidential notification procedures when an employee or contractor receives a positive COVID-19 test result;
  • Ensure employee access to their own COVID-19 exposure and medical records;
  • Implement return to work policies and procedures following illness or exposure (including following strategies mirroring those formerly set forth by the CDC);
  • Implement policies and procedures to observe physical distancing;
  • Ensure access to common areas, breakrooms, or lunchrooms is closed or controlled;
  • Ensure compliance with respiratory protection and personal protective equipment standards when occupying a vehicle for work purposes;
  • Follow specified sanitation and disinfecting guidelines; and
  • Provide personal protective equipment where required, including training on use.

There are additional requirements for jobs classified as medium, high, or very high exposure risk. Employers in the top three classifications have specific training requirements, including 30 days after the ETS effective date to implement training requirements on the ETS and 60 days to implement training requirements on the employer’s infectious disease preparedness and response plan. Finally, employers are prohibited from discriminating against employees exercising their rights under the ETS.

Action Items

  1. Review the ETS here.
  2. Conduct an assessment and implement a plan where applicable.
  3. Train employees on the ETS and plan by the required deadlines.
  4. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2020 ManagEase

Washington: New Overtime Exemption Rules

APPLIES TO

All Employers with WA Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 1, 2020

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

The Washington Department of Labor & Industries (DOLI) made changes to the minimum salary level and the job duties test for overtime exempt classifications. Although the salary level change went into effect July 1, 2020, the federal minimum level requirement is higher and must be followed until January 1, 2021 when the state minimum requirement will be higher at $827 per week ($43,004 annually) for small employers and $965 per week ($50,180 annually) for large employers. Eventually, the requirement will increase to 2.5 times the state minimum wage by 2028.

Additionally, the job duties test has been adjusted to align more closely with the federal job duties test, focusing on actual duties rather than job title or description. There is now one, rather than two, job duties test per exemption category. A main departure from the federal overtime exemption is that state rules do not permit a highly-compensated employee exemption.

Action Items

  1. Have overtime exempt classifications reviewed for compliance.
  2. Update job descriptions to be consistent with actual duties.
  3. Prepare for wage increases for exempt overtime employees.
  4. Subscribers can call our HR On-Call Hotline at (888) 378-2456 for further assistance.

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2020 ManagEase

August Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

This Short List addresses the following topics:
  1. EEOC Announces Mediation Program Expansion
  2. California: Unemployment Benefits Extended Up to an Additional 7 Weeks
  3. California: Updated Guidance During COVID-19
  4. Florida: Timeline to File Discrimination Claims Shortened
  5. Georgia: Unemployment Reporting for Part-Time Employees Not Mandatory
  6. Illinois: Guidance Issued on IDHR Disclosure Deadlines
  7. New Jersey: Arbitration Applies to Transportation Workers
  8. Pennsylvania: Expands Discrimination and Harassment Protections
  9. Philadelphia, PA: No Retaliation for COVID-19 Complaints
  10. Rhode Island: Clarifies When Employers May Terminate Employees for Refusing Drug Tests

Read more

California: Accessibility Matters for Business Websites

APPLIES TO

Businesses with Consumers in CA

EFFECTIVE

June 22, 2020

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Website accessibility is an increasingly hot topic. As of January 1, 2020, businesses subject to the California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA) must make the required consumer notices and information that are posted on company websites reasonably accessible to consumers with disabilities.  Specifically, businesses must follow generally recognized industry standards, such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, version 2.1 of June 5, 2018, from the World Wide Web Consortium, or provide information on how a consumer with a disability may access the notices in an alternative format.

More recently, in Martinez v. San Diego County Credit Union, a California Court of Appeal recently stated that accessibility standards for public accommodations, as prescribed in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), can apply to a business’s website in cases where utilizing the website grants access to the business’s physical locations, goods, or services.  There, a visually impaired plaintiff sued a credit union whose website was not easily accessible using screen-reading software.

The court noted that the website housed a store locator and information about the credit union’s services, which made it easier for sighted customers to find physical locations to access service.  The link between the customer’s use of the website and their ability to access the physical location of the website and services triggered the ADA accessibility standard.  Ultimately, the court did not determine if the credit union’s website violated the law, but rather stated there was a potential claim for violation of ADA standards.

Action Items

  1. Evaluate websites for ADA and CCPA compliance.10

Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser.

© 2020 ManagEase