Minnesota: Legislative Update

APPLIES TO

As Indicated

EFFECTIVE

As Indicated

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • The Minnesota Legislature passed a large omnibus bill that contains several new and amended laws that significantly impact employers.
  • Employers with 30 or more employees must comply with pay transparency requirements by January 1, 2025.
  • Independent contractor misclassification is subject to increased penalties.
  • Benefits must be maintained during pregnancy and parental leave and additional protections were added for prenatal care medical appointments.
  • Service providers are prohibited from entering into a contract prohibiting their customers from soliciting or hiring the service provider’s employees.
  • Usage of an alternative minimum wage will be restricted to those under 20 years old and only for the first 90 days of employment.
  • The full amount of all tips received through an electronic payment must be paid to the employee.
  • The Minnesota Human Rights Act is amended to expand definitions, increase penalties, and extend the time to file a claim.
  • The Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act allows oral fluid testing.

Discussion

During Minnesota’s most recent legislative session, the state passed several new and amended laws as part of an omnibus bill that will impact Minnesota employers. Key aspects of the bill are summarized below.

 

New Pay Transparency Requirements. Effective January 1, 2025, employers with 30 or more total employees in Minnesota will be subject to the state’s new pay transparency requirements.  Covered employers will be required to include in all job postings a starting salary range, or if no range, a fixed pay rate.  The range must include a minimum and a maximum amount based on the employer’s good-faith estimate of the opportunity for each position, and cannot be open-ended.  Additionally, any posting must include a “description of all the benefits and other compensation, including but not limited to any health or retirement benefits” associated with the position.

 

The term “job posting” is defined broadly in the new law to include “any solicitation intended to recruit job applicants for a specific available position, including recruitment done directly by an employer or indirectly through a third party, and includes any postings made electronically or via printed hard copy, that includes [sic] qualifications for desired applicants.”

 

New Requirements for Independent Contractors. Effective July 1, 2024, significant changes go into effect to Minnesota’s independent contractor laws. All employers, as well as owners, will be subject to increased monetary penalties for the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. Specifically, employers may face up to $10,000 per individual violation for the improper classification of employees. Additional penalties may be imposed if employers fail to report workers as employees to a state agency. Under the new law, individual owners and officers may be held personally responsible for intentional or continued violations.

 

In addition, and effective March 1, 2025, the Minnesota legislature has updated the factor test for determining employee or independent contractor status for the construction industry. While all industries except construction will continue to use the five-factor test to determine classification, a new 14-factor test has replaced the preexisting 9-factor test in the construction industry. The new test focuses on the time at which the services were provided for purposes of determining appropriate classification. All of the factors must be met in order to confirm independent contractor classification.

 

Under the new test an individual is an independent contractor only if they:

  1. Were established and maintained separately from the person to whom they are providing services;
  2. Own, rent, or lease equipment, tools, vehicles, materials, supplies, etc. that are used in performing their service;
  3. Provides or performs services to multiple persons or to the general public;
  4. Is in compliance with specific business registration requirements;
  5. Is in good standing;
  6. Has a state unemployment insurance account;
  7. Has workers’ compensation insurance;
  8. Holds a current business license;
  9. Is operating under a contract, subject to specific compliance requirements;
  10. Submits invoices and receives payments;
  11. Maintains control over the means of providing or performing the specific services;
  12. Incurs and maintains expenses and costs;
  13. Is responsible for the completion of specific services as stated in the applicable contract; and
  14. May realize additional profit or suffer loss.

 

Pregnancy and Parental Leave Enhancements. Effective August 1, 2024, the Minnesota legislature has revised the Pregnancy and Parental Leave law to require the 12 weeks of parental leave guaranteed by state law “not be reduced by any period of paid or unpaid leave taken for prenatal care medical appointments.” This means an individual may use more than 12 weeks of protected leave in connection with pregnancy-related medical appointments prior to birth and for care of a child following birth.

 

Additionally, Minnesota will now require employers to continue providing insurance benefits for employees on leave, and their dependents, as if the employees were not on leave.

 

New Non-Compete Restrictions. Effective July 1, 2024, a new law prohibits service providers from entering into a contract prohibiting their customers from soliciting or hiring the service provider’s employees, independent contractors, or any other person who performs work for the service provider. Subject to very limited exceptions, “service providers” is defined broadly to include any businesses or groups of persons that are contracted to provide services to a customer. The new law applies to any contractual provision that restricts, restrains, or in any way prohibits the customers from directly or indirectly soliciting or hiring those individuals. Such provisions are deemed void and unenforceable and service providers are required to notify employees of any provision that violates this ban.

 

Elimination of Alternative Minimum Wage. Effective January 1, 2025, a lower minimum wage may be paid only to those under 20, and only for the first 90 days of their employment.

 

Payment of Electronic Tips. Effective August 1, 2024, the full amount of all tips received through an electronic payment, such as the use of a credit card or app, must be credited to the employee in the pay period in which it was received and paid to the employee no later than the next scheduled pay period.

 

Amendments to Minnesota Human Rights Act. Several amendments to the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) were passed that impact employee rights and potential damages.

 

  • Expanded Definitions – Similar to the ADA, the definition of “disability” in the MHRA is expanded to include any person who has an impairment that is episodic or in remission and would materially limit a major life activity when active. The definition of “familial status” is also broadened to include caretakers. Under this new definition, it is unlawful to discriminate against persons “residing with and caring for one or more individuals who lack the ability to meet essential requirements for physical health, safety, or self-care because the individual or individuals are unable to receive and evaluate information or make or communicate decisions.”
  • Increased Potential Damages – A new section has been added to the MHRA concerning civil penalties and amending the damages available for successful claims. Compensatory damages now explicitly include mental anguish and suffering, and (along with back pay and front pay) are subject to a multiplier up to three times “the actual damages sustained.” The amendments also remove the cap on punitive damages and require that in cases decided by a jury, the jury will determine the amount of alldamages to be awarded, including compensatory, treble, and punitive damages.
  • Extended Time to File Claims – Previously, individuals alleging a claim under the MHRA had 45 days to commence litigation following receipt of notice of dismissal from the Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR). Under the amended law, individuals will now have 90 days.
  • MDHR Determination Timeline – Under the amended law, the MDHR must make a determination on a charge of discrimination within one year of filing.

 

Amendments to Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act. Minnesota will now allow the use of “oral fluid testing” for drug, alcohol and cannabis testing. This change does not expand the list of substances that an employer is permitted to test for, instead, it expands an employer’s options for how to test. Anyone who receives a positive, inconclusive, or invalid result from an oral fluid test must be provided a laboratory test at the employer’s expense, if requested by the applicant or employee within 48 hours. If the applicant or employee fails the laboratory test, they are entitled to request a second retest at their own expense.

 

Action Items

  1. Review and update job postings and descriptions for compliance with pay transparency requirements.
  2. Review employee and independent contractor classifications.
  3. Review any restrictive covenants with legal counsel to determine compliance.
  4. Review wage rates for minor employees and other employees earning minimum wage.
  5. Review and update leave policies, as applicable.
  6. Review and update drug testing policies and procedures to account for new oral fluid testing allowance.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2024 ManagEase

New Jersey: Supreme Court Clarifies 2019 Wage and Hour Law Amendments

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in NJ

EFFECTIVE

May 15, 2024

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • In Maia v. IEW Construction Group, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled amendments to the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law (WHL) and Wage Payment Law (WPL) could not be applied retroactively.
  • The expanded liquidated damages, statute of limitations period, retaliation protections, and recovery of attorneys’ fees are only available for conduct that occurred after August 6, 2019.

Discussion

In Maia v. IEW Construction Group, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled amendments to the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law (WHL) and Wage Payment Law (WPL) could not be applied retroactively. Here, the plaintiffs performed work as laborers for the defendant construction company. Their jobs required pre-shift and post-shift duties like dropping off and picking up equipment at different worksites. During the time the plaintiffs were employed, they were not paid for this pre- and post-shift work. Both plaintiffs were laid off at the same time and filed claims alleging violations of the WHL and WPL.

 

On August 6, 2019, the WHL and WPL were amended to allow recovery of liquidated damages up to 200% of the amount at issue under WHL and WPL claims. The amendments also added retaliation claims to the WPL and WHL, recovery of attorneys’ fees under the WPL, and extended the statute of limitations under the WHL from two to six years. In this case, both of the plaintiffs’ claims contained damages that accrued prior to the effective date of the amendments, which the trial court dismissed, and the Supreme Court upheld.

 

In determining that the 2019 amendments could not be applied retroactively, the court applied a two-prong test established by New Jersey case law. First, the legislature’s intent for retroactive application is determined by considering: 1) when the legislature explicitly or implicitly states an intent for the law to be retroactive; 2) when the amendment is ameliorative or curative; and 3) when the parties’ expectations warrant retroactive application. Second, the court must determine whether retroactive application of the statute will result in either an unconstitutional interference with vested rights or a manifest injustice.

 

After reviewing the legislative text of the 2019 amendments, the court did not find anything to support the first prong of the test. Therefore, there was no need to turn to the second prong. The expanded liquidated damages, statute of limitations period, retaliation protections, and recovery of attorneys’ fees are only available for conduct that occurred after August 6, 2019.

Action Items

  1. Review timekeeping and payroll procedures for pre- and post-shift work.
  2. Consult with legal counsel on wage and hour claims.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2024 ManagEase

New York: Workplace Violence Protections for Retail Employees

APPLIES TO

Employers in NY with 10+ Retail Employees

EFFECTIVE

Pending

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • The State Legislature passed AB A8947C, pending Governor Hochul’s signature, and would create significant workplace violence prevention requirements for retail employers.

Discussion

The State Legislature passed AB A8947C and is expected to be signed by the Governor. The bill would create significant workplace violence prevention requirements for retail employers. The law will go into effect 180 days after signature. The significant requirements of the bill are below:

 

Covered Employer. A covered employer is any person, entity, business, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or an association employing at least 10 retail employees. The State of New York, a political subdivision, public authority, or other governmental agencies are excluded from coverage.

 

Retail Employee and Retail Store. A retail employee is an employee working at a retail store for an employer. A retail store is a store that sells consumer commodities at retail, and which is not primarily engaged in the sale of food for consumption on the premises.

 

Panic Button. Employers of 500 or more retail employees nationwide must provide panic buttons throughout the worksite. These can be physical or mobile phone-based. Physical panic buttons must immediately contact local 9-1-1 and provide the employee location information while dispatching law enforcement to the worksite. Mobile phone-based buttons can only be installed on employer-provided equipment and cannot track employee locations except when the panic button is triggered.

 

Workplace Violence Prevention Policy. The State Department of Labor will create a draft model plan, but employers must adopt the model plan or create their own equivalent plan. The plan must be in writing and provided to employees upon hire and annually. The primary requirements of the written plan are as follows:

  • Outline a list of factors or situations that might place retail employees at risk of workplace violence (e.g., working late night, exchanging money with the public, etc.);
  • List methods that may be used to prevent incidents of workplace violence (e.g., reporting systems);
  • Include information about applicable federal and state statutory requirements regarding retail workers and remedies available to victims of violence in the workplace; and
  • Statement of non-retaliation for those who complain of risk factors, or who testify or assist in any proceeding under the law.

 

Training. Upon hire and annually thereafter, employees must be provided a training that includes: 1) information on the requirements of the bill; 2) examples of protective measures retail employees can use; 3) de-escalation tactics; 4) active shooter drills; 5) emergency procedures; and 6) instructions on the use of security alarms, panic buttons, and other emergency devices.

 

Notice. All employees must be provided a notice, at the time of hire and annually at each training, of the employer’s workplace violence prevention policy and information provided during the training.

Action Items

  1. Review and revise current workplace violence prevention policies and procedures, as required.
  2. Assess worksite(s) for potential threats of workplace violence.
  3. Determine options for panic buttons and placement.
  4. Have appropriate personnel trained on the requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2024 ManagEase

Oregon: Legislative Updates

APPLIES TO

As Indicated

EFFECTIVE

As Indicated

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Oregon’s Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) issued a proposed rule which creates additional criteria for evaluating what constitutes “appropriate corrective action” and “promptly correcting harassing behavior” under current law for responding to harassment complaints.
  • Effective July 1, 2024, HB 4156 expands protections under Oregon’s anti-stalking laws by criminalizing new forms of threatening and predatory conduct and expanding employees’ access to paid and unpaid safe leave benefits.
  • As a reminder, effective July 1, 2024, Paid Leave Oregon and the Oregon Family Leave Act (OFLA) no longer run concurrently.

Discussion

A pair of laws and regulatory action will keep Oregon employers busy this summer. The key provisions of these requirements are summarized below.

 

Employer’s Duty Regarding Allegations of Harassment. Oregon’s Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) issued a proposed rule which creates additional criteria for evaluating what constitutes “appropriate corrective action” and “promptly correcting harassing behavior” under current law for employers responding to harassment complaints. These factors include, but are not limited to, whether the employer:

 

  • Intervenes without avoidable delay to effectively halt harassing behavior;
  • Adequately investigates and ascertains the extent of harassing behavior;
  • Takes appropriate disciplinary measures proportionate to the seriousness of the offense;
  • Does not penalize the reporting employee or make the aggrieved party worse off; and
  • Effectively acts to prevent further harassment or retaliation against the reporting employee or aggrieved party for reporting or exercising rights concerning harassing behavior.

 

These changes may complicate existing law rather than clarify them. For example, the proposed rule may create an opportunity for an employee to criticize the discipline selected by the employer for the alleged harasser.

 

Anti-Stalking Expansion. Effective July 1, 2024, HB 4156 expands protections under Oregon’s anti-stalking laws by criminalizing new forms of threatening and predatory conduct and expanding employees’ access to paid and unpaid safe leave benefits. The definition of “repeated and unwanted contact” has been expanded to include forms of online harassment, theft or misappropriation of a victim’s personal information, disclosing intimate or sexual images of someone without their consent, using electronic means to monitor or interfere with a victim’s communications or activities, or cause others to harass, humiliate, or injure the victim by disclosing names, images, or personal information.

 

Additionally, employers with six or more employees must allow employees to take “reasonable leave from employment” for seeking legal or law enforcement assistance to ensure their health and safety from stalkers, obtaining medical treatment or recovering from stalking-related injuries, and receiving counseling from a licensed mental health professional. Paid Leave Oregon also allows employees to take up to 12 weeks of paid leave for specified purposes, including safe leave for those victimized by stalking crimes.

 

Paid Leave Oregon and OFLA Update. As a reminder, effective July 1, 2024, Paid Leave Oregon and the Oregon Family Leave Act (OFLA) no longer run concurrently. Eligible employees may draw on either OFLA or Paid Leave Oregon (but not both at the same time) for qualifying events. Employers need to notify employees with OFLA leave approved for July 1 or later if OFLA no longer covers their absence. Sample language for the notice can be found on the BOLI website.

Action Items

  1. Review existing policies and procedures for reporting and investigating harassment claims.
  2. Review leave policies for employee access to paid and unpaid safe leave benefits.
  3. Review and revise leave policies to align with OFLA and Paid Leave Oregon requirements.
  4. Train appropriate personnel on the requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2024 ManagEase

Vermont: New Pay Transparency Disclosures

APPLIES TO

All Employers with 5+ VT Employees

EFFECTIVE

July 1, 2025

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • 704 now adds Vermont to the list of states that require pay transparency disclosures for applicants and employees.
  • The law applies to employers with five or more employees with any job that will be physically located in Vermont or a remote position that will predominantly perform work for an office or work location that is physically located in the state.
  • It also applies to all jobs open to internal or external candidates, including positions for transfer or promotion.

Discussion

  1. 704 now adds Vermont to the list of states that require pay transparency disclosures for applicants and employees. The law applies to employers with five or more employees with any job that will be physically located in Vermont or a remote position that will predominantly perform work for an office or work location that is physically located in the state. It also applies to all jobs open to internal or external candidates, including positions for transfer or promotion.

In each posting, covered employers must disclose the compensation or range of compensation which is the minimum and maximum annual salary or hourly wage for a job opening. The compensation must be what the employer in good faith expects to pay at the time the employer creates the job posting. Benefits and other compensation are not required to be disclosed. Job postings for tipped positions must disclose: (1) the job opening is paid on a tipped basis; and (2) the base wage or range of base wages.

 

Jobs paid on a commission basis are excluded from the law. Employers who refuse to interview, hire, promote, or employ an applicant or employee due to their exercise of rights under the law are in violation of the law. The Vermont Attorney General or state’s attorney are authorized to enforce the law which includes penalties like restitution of wages and other appropriate relief.

Action Items

  1. Update job descriptions.
  2. Conduct an equal pay audit.
  3. Implement wage ranges for appropriate positions.
  4. Update job posting procedures.
  5. Have appropriate personnel trained on the requirements.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2024 ManagEase

Virginia: Legislative Update

APPLIES TO

All Employers with Employees in VA

EFFECTIVE

July 1, 2024

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

Quick Look

  • Virginia’s most recent General Assembly brought several new and amended laws that will impact employers.
  • The Virginia Human Rights Act is expanded to include “ethnic origin” as a protected class, and the timing and procedure for filing claims is expanded.
  • Protections for medicinal cannabis oil is expanded to most public employees.
  • A veterans’ benefits and services poster will be created for display.

Discussion

At the close of the most recent General Assembly, the Virginia legislature passed several employment-related bills that went into effect on July 1, 2024. Key aspects to the new and amended laws are summarized below.

Amendments to Virginia Human Rights Act.

  • HB 18 amends the Virginia Human Rights Act (VHRA) to now include “ethnic origin” to the list of protected classifications.
  • HB 782 extends the time for employees to bring discrimination charges under Virginia law in certain circumstances. Under the amendment, individuals who want to file both a federal charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and a state charge with the Virginia Office of the Attorney General’s Office of Civil Rights (VOCR) may do so within 300 days of the alleged unlawful employment practice.
  • SB 350 amends the administrative procedure for filing a lawsuit following a charge of discrimination, allowing individuals who have filed with the VOCR to file their VHRA claim in court once 180 days have passed from the filing of the charge, even if the VOCR has not issued a right to sue notice. This change will likely result in an increase of claims proceeding to litigation.

 

Protections for Medicinal Cannabis Oil Expanded to Public Employees. SB 391 amends Virginia’s medical marijuana protections by specifying that an employee’s lawful medical use of cannabis oil, as defined in Section 4.1-1600 of the Virginia Code, must conform to the laws of the Commonwealth to be protected (i.e., by using cannabis oil for medical reasons pursuant to a professional practitioner’s certification).  The bill also expands these protections to most state and local public employees, including employees of the Commonwealth and its counties, cities, towns, and political subdivisions.  These protections, however, were not extended to law-enforcement officers. This change does not affect employers’ ability to prohibit cannabis possession during work hours.

 

Veterans Benefits and Services Poster. HB 160 directs the VA Department of Labor and Industry (DOLI), in consultation with the VA Department of Veteran Services, to create a poster describing benefits and services available to veterans. Displaying the poster will not be mandatory but may be beneficial to employers by demonstrating that employers take veterans’ assistance and related matters seriously and may help employers defend against claims of discrimination based on servicemember or veteran status. Employers who choose to display the poster must do so in the same location where they post other employee notices.

Action Items

  1. Review and update anti-discrimination policies to encompass expanded definitions.
  2. Review and update policies and procedures related to use of medical cannabis.
  3. Display veterans’ assistance poster when available.

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2024 ManagEase

July Updates

APPLIES TO

Varies

EFFECTIVE

Varies

QUESTIONS?

Contact HR On-Call

(888) 378-2456

EEOC Amends Regulations Governing Discrimination Claims Brought by Government Employees

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has amended its existing regulations under which state and local government employees who were previously exempt from coverage under Title VII may now bring claims of employment discrimination pursuant to the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991 (GERA). The amendments went into effect on July 5, 2024. Under the amended regulations, individuals identified in the GERA who believe they have been discriminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, genetic information, or pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, or who have been retaliated against for opposing any practice made unlawful by federal law, may file a claim in accordance with the EEOC’s administrative procedures. Like others filing a complaint with the EEOC, the claim must be filed within 180 days after the occurrence of the alleged discriminatory or retaliatory action.

 

OFCCP Identifies 500 Compliance Evaluations for Supply & Service Contractors

On June 7, 2024, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) published its fiscal year 2024 Corporate Scheduling Announcement List for Supply and Service Contractors. This publication serves as a courtesy notification to certain federal contractors that one or more of their establishments is likely to undergo a compliance evaluation by the OFCCP. For fiscal year 2024, the list includes 440 establishment reviews, 30 Corporate Management Compliance Evaluation reviews, 24 Functional Affirmative Action Program reviews, and 6 University reviews. OFCCP has stated that it will begin to send out scheduling letters to some of the identified contractors immediately, although it generally takes the OFCCP several years to complete the full list. Employers should review the list for facilities and subsidiaries within their organization and confirm that those facilities are prepared for the specified reviews.

 

DOL Issues Final Rule Regulating Silica Dust Exposure for Miners

On June 30, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor published a final rule intended to better protect miners from health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica, also known as silica dust or quartz dust. The final rule lowers the permissible exposure limit of respirable crystalline silica to 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air for a full-shift exposure, calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average. If a miner’s exposure exceeds the limit, the final rule requires mine operators to take immediate corrective actions to come into compliance. In addition to reducing exposure limits, the final rule also: (1) requires mine operators to use certain engineering controls to prevent miners’ overexposures; (2) compels metal and nonmetal mine operators to establish medical surveillance programs; and (3) replaces an outdated standard for respiratory protection with a new standard reflecting the latest advances in respiratory protection and practices.

 

OPM Issues Final Rule on Protections for Nonpartisan Career Civil Service

On April 9, 2024, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) published a final rule that clarifies and reinforces long-standing protections and merit system principles for career civil servants. The final rule clarifies that the status and civil service protections an employee has accrued cannot be taken away by an involuntary move from the competitive service to the excepted service, or from one excepted service schedule to another. Once a career civil servant earns protections, that employee retains them unless waived voluntarily. The final rule also establishes procedural requirements for moving positions from the competitive service to the excepted service and within the excepted service. This change both creates transparency and establishes an appeals process for federal employees when any such movement is involuntary and characterized as stripping employees of their civil service protections.

 

Veterans Affairs Issues Final Rule Limiting Access to Certain EEO Program Records

On June 18, 2024, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs published a final rule that will exempt selected diversity and equal employment opportunity (EEO) program records from certain Privacy Act provisions in order to prevent interference with harassment and sexual harassment administrative investigations. The exempted records include, among other things: management notifications; investigator and coordinator findings; determinations as to whether harassment occurred; and the preventive or corrective action taken. The VA has explained in support of this new rule that disclosure of these identified records would cause sources to refrain from providing information due to fear of reprisal and that disclosure would compromise guarantees of anonymity and confidentiality. The rule is set to go into effect 30 days from its date of publication in the Federal Register.

 

Chicago, IL: Updated Postings and Notices for Wage and Hour Compliance

The Chicago Department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection (BACP) Office of Labor Standards (COLS) recently provided updated required postings and notices which were required to be sent to employees by July 1, 2024 with employee paychecks. First is the notice of the increase in the general minimum wage to $16.20 and $11.02 for tipped employees. Second is the revised wage theft notice. Additionally, employees need to be notified of the Fair Work Week Ordinance and the predictive scheduling requirements. Lastly, the Paid Leave and Paid Sick Leave Notice must be issued to all employees, new employees upon hire, and annually thereafter. This is in addition to a workplace poster requirement.

 

 


Disclaimer: This document is designed to provide general information and guidance concerning employment-related issues. It is presented with the understanding that ManagEase is not engaged in rendering any legal opinions. If a legal opinion is needed, please contact the services of your own legal adviser. © 2024 ManagEase